國立虎尾科技大學 |

Teaching Methods in Mathematics and Their Impact on Sixth-Grade Students' Mathematics Anxiety, Attitudes, and Achievement.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Teaching Methods in Mathematics and Their Impact on Sixth-Grade Students' Mathematics Anxiety, Attitudes, and Achievement./
作者:	Tubbs, Lillian.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (142 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 76-04, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International76-04A.
標題:	Mathematics education. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9781321221916

Teaching Methods in Mathematics and Their Impact on Sixth-Grade Students' Mathematics Anxiety, Attitudes, and Achievement.
Tubbs, Lillian.

Teaching Methods in Mathematics and Their Impact on Sixth-Grade Students' Mathematics Anxiety, Attitudes, and Achievement. - 1 online resource (142 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 76-04, Section: A.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--Union University, 2014.

Includes bibliographical references

The focus of this study was to determine if statistical significant differences occurred in sixth grade ability-grouped students' mathematics anxiety, attitude towards mathematics, and mathematics achievement when taught by three different teaching methods. Additionally, it was questioned as to whether gender affected the outcomes. Three different assessments were utilized in this quasi-experimental, nonrandomized control group, pretest-posttest design study. The 67 participants were taught using three instructional approaches: (a) technology-based instruction, (b) multiple intelligence-based instruction, or (c) traditional-based instruction. The Mathematics Anxiety Rating Scale and the Attitude Toward Mathematics Inventory, as well as the Foundations of Algebra Assessment were utilized to determine significance. Using a three-way MANOVA, the results showed that collectively, significance was seen in gender and the interaction of method and ability group. Moreover, the interaction of teaching method, ability group, and gender also showed significance. When the analysis was performed on the independent variables, results showed significance was observed in male and female attitudes. Males showed preference for the technology-based instruction while females showed preference for the multiple intelligence-based instruction. Furthermore, significance in attitude was observed with ability groups. High ability students and average ability students favored the technology approach while low ability students favored the multiple intelligence approach. Significance was also apparent when teaching methods were compared. Both males and females scored significantly higher with the traditional approach. When the interaction of teaching method, ability group, and gender was analyzed, attitude for males and females exhibited significance. High ability male students preferred the technology approach while average ability male students preferred the traditional approach. Somewhat similar, low ability male students preferred both the multiple intelligence approach and the traditional approach. Attitude for high ability female students showed significance with the multiple intelligence method, whereas attitude for average ability female students showed significance with the technology approach. Attitude for low ability female students showed significance for the multiple intelligence approach. When ability group with achievement was compared, high ability students scored significantly higher than average ability students and low ability students. No significance occurred when anxiety was examined.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9781321221916Subjects--Topical Terms:

1148686
Mathematics education.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Ability groupsIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Teaching Methods in Mathematics and Their Impact on Sixth-Grade Students' Mathematics Anxiety, Attitudes, and Achievement.
LDR:04145ntm a22004337 4500 001 1145036
005 20240617111745.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 250605s2014 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9781321221916
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3582802
035 $a AAI3582802
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Tubbs, Lillian. $3 1470243
245 1 0 $a Teaching Methods in Mathematics and Their Impact on Sixth-Grade Students' Mathematics Anxiety, Attitudes, and Achievement.
264 0 $c 2014
300 $a 1 online resource (142 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 76-04, Section: A.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Singleton, Ann.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--Union University, 2014.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a The focus of this study was to determine if statistical significant differences occurred in sixth grade ability-grouped students' mathematics anxiety, attitude towards mathematics, and mathematics achievement when taught by three different teaching methods. Additionally, it was questioned as to whether gender affected the outcomes. Three different assessments were utilized in this quasi-experimental, nonrandomized control group, pretest-posttest design study. The 67 participants were taught using three instructional approaches: (a) technology-based instruction, (b) multiple intelligence-based instruction, or (c) traditional-based instruction. The Mathematics Anxiety Rating Scale and the Attitude Toward Mathematics Inventory, as well as the Foundations of Algebra Assessment were utilized to determine significance. Using a three-way MANOVA, the results showed that collectively, significance was seen in gender and the interaction of method and ability group. Moreover, the interaction of teaching method, ability group, and gender also showed significance. When the analysis was performed on the independent variables, results showed significance was observed in male and female attitudes. Males showed preference for the technology-based instruction while females showed preference for the multiple intelligence-based instruction. Furthermore, significance in attitude was observed with ability groups. High ability students and average ability students favored the technology approach while low ability students favored the multiple intelligence approach. Significance was also apparent when teaching methods were compared. Both males and females scored significantly higher with the traditional approach. When the interaction of teaching method, ability group, and gender was analyzed, attitude for males and females exhibited significance. High ability male students preferred the technology approach while average ability male students preferred the traditional approach. Somewhat similar, low ability male students preferred both the multiple intelligence approach and the traditional approach. Attitude for high ability female students showed significance with the multiple intelligence method, whereas attitude for average ability female students showed significance with the technology approach. Attitude for low ability female students showed significance for the multiple intelligence approach. When ability group with achievement was compared, high ability students scored significantly higher than average ability students and low ability students. No significance occurred when anxiety was examined.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2024
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Mathematics education. $3 1148686
650 4 $a Educational psychology. $3 555103
650 4 $a Curriculum development. $3 1148494
650 4 $a Middle school education. $3 1148691
653 $a Ability groups
653 $a Mathematics
653 $a Mathematics teaching methods
653 $a Middle school
653 $a Multiple intelligences
653 $a Technology
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0280
690 $a 0450
690 $a 0525
690 $a 0727
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a Union University. $b Educational Leadership. $3 1181964
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 76-04A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3582802 $z click for full text (PQDT)