國立虎尾科技大學 |

Intersectional Politics? How Women Negotiate Their Identities and Why it Matters Politically.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Intersectional Politics? How Women Negotiate Their Identities and Why it Matters Politically./
作者:	Vicuna, Bianca Vannessa.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (163 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-11, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International85-11B.
標題:	Political science. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798382750200

Intersectional Politics? How Women Negotiate Their Identities and Why it Matters Politically.
Vicuna, Bianca Vannessa.

Intersectional Politics? How Women Negotiate Their Identities and Why it Matters Politically. - 1 online resource (163 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-11, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Los Angeles, 2024.

Includes bibliographical references

Historically, the leaders of mainstream U.S. Women's Movements have struggled to effectively manage the racial/ethnic diversity among women in order to form and maintain coalitions. Previous research indicates the reason behind this struggle is that mainstream feminist leaders fail to recognize the fact that women with different social positions have different preferences about how intragroup differences should be managed within the movement. Advantaged subgroups of women (e.g., White women) prefer movements that focus on shared experiences with gender discrimination, while the disadvantaged subgroups of women (e.g., Latinas) prefer movements that account for the interaction of gender discrimination with other axes of marginalization. While these patterns have been well-established in the literature, we know less about the psychological processes that facilitate these effects.In this dissertation, I argue that diversity management strategies (DMS) that recognize women's intragroup differences across race/ethnicity increase WoC's sense that women can address the issues they face (i.e., increase WoC's perceived group efficacy), which then results in higher levels of cooperation with White women. In contrast, these multicultural DMS should decrease White women's sense of perceived group efficacy, which then later results in lower levels of political support for women of color. To test my arguments, I use three sets of parallel survey experiments with adult Latinas and adult White women. In the first set of experiments, I find that Latinas and White women who prefer the recognition of intragroup differences tend to express a stronger sense of group efficacy, which then later results in a stronger interest in coalition formation. In the second set of experiments, I find that organizers need to be careful when recognizing intragroup differences as misapplying this recognition has the potential of deterring or neutralizing the levels of political support that Latinas and White women expressed for one another. In the last set of experiments, I find that Latinas' responses to diversity management strategies are not conditioned by their preferences for maintaining group hierarchies. I find, however, that White Women's responses to diversity management strategies are conditioned by the degree to which they favor group hierarchies.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798382750200Subjects--Topical Terms:

558774
Political science.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Coalition formationIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Intersectional Politics? How Women Negotiate Their Identities and Why it Matters Politically.
LDR:03808ntm a22004097 4500 001 1152772
005 20241213095556.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 250605s2024 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798382750200
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI31300812
035 $a AAI31300812
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Vicuna, Bianca Vannessa. $3 1479858
245 1 0 $a Intersectional Politics? How Women Negotiate Their Identities and Why it Matters Politically.
264 0 $c 2024
300 $a 1 online resource (163 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-11, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Perez, Efren O.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Los Angeles, 2024.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Historically, the leaders of mainstream U.S. Women's Movements have struggled to effectively manage the racial/ethnic diversity among women in order to form and maintain coalitions. Previous research indicates the reason behind this struggle is that mainstream feminist leaders fail to recognize the fact that women with different social positions have different preferences about how intragroup differences should be managed within the movement. Advantaged subgroups of women (e.g., White women) prefer movements that focus on shared experiences with gender discrimination, while the disadvantaged subgroups of women (e.g., Latinas) prefer movements that account for the interaction of gender discrimination with other axes of marginalization. While these patterns have been well-established in the literature, we know less about the psychological processes that facilitate these effects.In this dissertation, I argue that diversity management strategies (DMS) that recognize women's intragroup differences across race/ethnicity increase WoC's sense that women can address the issues they face (i.e., increase WoC's perceived group efficacy), which then results in higher levels of cooperation with White women. In contrast, these multicultural DMS should decrease White women's sense of perceived group efficacy, which then later results in lower levels of political support for women of color. To test my arguments, I use three sets of parallel survey experiments with adult Latinas and adult White women. In the first set of experiments, I find that Latinas and White women who prefer the recognition of intragroup differences tend to express a stronger sense of group efficacy, which then later results in a stronger interest in coalition formation. In the second set of experiments, I find that organizers need to be careful when recognizing intragroup differences as misapplying this recognition has the potential of deterring or neutralizing the levels of political support that Latinas and White women expressed for one another. In the last set of experiments, I find that Latinas' responses to diversity management strategies are not conditioned by their preferences for maintaining group hierarchies. I find, however, that White Women's responses to diversity management strategies are conditioned by the degree to which they favor group hierarchies.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2024
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Political science. $3 558774
650 4 $a Social psychology. $3 554804
650 4 $a Womens studies. $3 1372829
650 4 $a Ethnic studies. $2 bicssc $3 809601
653 $a Coalition formation
653 $a Diversity management
653 $a Feminist movements
653 $a Intragroup dynamics
653 $a Perceived group efficacy
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0451
690 $a 0453
690 $a 0631
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a University of California, Los Angeles. $b Political Science 0699. $3 1195418
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 85-11B.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31300812 $z click for full text (PQDT)