語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Three Essays on Board-Level Sustainability Committees.
紀錄類型:
書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Three Essays on Board-Level Sustainability Committees./
作者:
Baro, Fadimbe O.
面頁冊數:
1 online resource (162 pages)
附註:
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-03, Section: A.
Contained By:
Dissertations Abstracts International85-03A.
標題:
Finance. -
電子資源:
click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:
9798380334112
Three Essays on Board-Level Sustainability Committees.
Baro, Fadimbe O.
Three Essays on Board-Level Sustainability Committees.
- 1 online resource (162 pages)
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-03, Section: A.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Massachusetts Boston, 2023.
Includes bibliographical references
This dissertation is composed of three related essays that investigate firms' board-level commitment to sustainability and their impact on corporate risk-taking, strategy, CSR performance, and Financial Reporting Quality.The first essay examines whether board-level commitment to sustainability reduce deviations from optimal risk taking. I find that sustainability committees reduce fluctuations from optimal risk taking (excessive risk taking and excessive risk avoidance), using a modified version of Bargeron et al. (2010) regression model and a sample of 2,583 firm years from 2002 to 2012. The second essay examines whether the type of business strategy firms follow, along with the stakeholder focus of their sustainability committee, could have an important effect on their CSR performance. The findings suggest that firms with a prospector business strategy are associated with more CSR performance that is driven by their direct and internal stakeholders' related CSR activities, whereas firms following a defender strategy are negatively associated with CSR performance because of their worse direct and internal stakeholders' related CSR activities. However, firms with a third-party focused sustainability committee have better CSR performance, while firms with an internal stakeholder focused sustainability committee have worse CSR performance. In addition, as a group, defenders are associated with more CSR concerns, but board-level sustainability committee focused on third-party stakeholders mitigates these concerns and increases their overall socially responsible performance. The third essay explores firms' board-level commitment to sustainability and their impact on CSR performance and financial reporting quality. Specifically, two characteristics of board-level sustainability committees are examined: committee focus and directorship overlapping. The findings are two-folded. On one hand, sustainability committees with a community focus and employee (diversity) focus are not associated with CSR community strength and employee strength respectively, sustainability committee with an environment focus and product focus are significantly and positively associated with CSR environment and product strength, respectively. On the other hand, sustainability committees that focus on community and environment have a lower level of discretionary accruals. Regarding directorship overlapping, the findings suggest that sharing directors between sustainability committees and audit committees is beneficial to both corporate social performance and financial reporting quality, which supports the argument that having the same directors serving in both sustainability committees and other board committees could better allocate corporate resources and align shareholder value maximization objectives with stakeholder shared value considerations.
Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024
Mode of access: World Wide Web
ISBN: 9798380334112Subjects--Topical Terms:
559073
Finance.
Subjects--Index Terms:
Business strategyIndex Terms--Genre/Form:
554714
Electronic books.
Three Essays on Board-Level Sustainability Committees.
LDR
:04286ntm a22004097 4500
001
1146020
005
20240711091445.5
006
m o d
007
cr bn ---uuuuu
008
250605s2023 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020
$a
9798380334112
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI30573050
035
$a
AAI30573050
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$b
eng
$c
MiAaPQ
$d
NTU
100
1
$a
Baro, Fadimbe O.
$3
1471340
245
1 0
$a
Three Essays on Board-Level Sustainability Committees.
264
0
$c
2023
300
$a
1 online resource (162 pages)
336
$a
text
$b
txt
$2
rdacontent
337
$a
computer
$b
c
$2
rdamedia
338
$a
online resource
$b
cr
$2
rdacarrier
500
$a
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-03, Section: A.
500
$a
Advisor: Xu, Xiaolu.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Massachusetts Boston, 2023.
504
$a
Includes bibliographical references
520
$a
This dissertation is composed of three related essays that investigate firms' board-level commitment to sustainability and their impact on corporate risk-taking, strategy, CSR performance, and Financial Reporting Quality.The first essay examines whether board-level commitment to sustainability reduce deviations from optimal risk taking. I find that sustainability committees reduce fluctuations from optimal risk taking (excessive risk taking and excessive risk avoidance), using a modified version of Bargeron et al. (2010) regression model and a sample of 2,583 firm years from 2002 to 2012. The second essay examines whether the type of business strategy firms follow, along with the stakeholder focus of their sustainability committee, could have an important effect on their CSR performance. The findings suggest that firms with a prospector business strategy are associated with more CSR performance that is driven by their direct and internal stakeholders' related CSR activities, whereas firms following a defender strategy are negatively associated with CSR performance because of their worse direct and internal stakeholders' related CSR activities. However, firms with a third-party focused sustainability committee have better CSR performance, while firms with an internal stakeholder focused sustainability committee have worse CSR performance. In addition, as a group, defenders are associated with more CSR concerns, but board-level sustainability committee focused on third-party stakeholders mitigates these concerns and increases their overall socially responsible performance. The third essay explores firms' board-level commitment to sustainability and their impact on CSR performance and financial reporting quality. Specifically, two characteristics of board-level sustainability committees are examined: committee focus and directorship overlapping. The findings are two-folded. On one hand, sustainability committees with a community focus and employee (diversity) focus are not associated with CSR community strength and employee strength respectively, sustainability committee with an environment focus and product focus are significantly and positively associated with CSR environment and product strength, respectively. On the other hand, sustainability committees that focus on community and environment have a lower level of discretionary accruals. Regarding directorship overlapping, the findings suggest that sharing directors between sustainability committees and audit committees is beneficial to both corporate social performance and financial reporting quality, which supports the argument that having the same directors serving in both sustainability committees and other board committees could better allocate corporate resources and align shareholder value maximization objectives with stakeholder shared value considerations.
533
$a
Electronic reproduction.
$b
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
$c
ProQuest,
$d
2024
538
$a
Mode of access: World Wide Web
650
4
$a
Finance.
$3
559073
650
4
$a
Sustainability.
$3
793436
653
$a
Business strategy
653
$a
Corporate risk-taking
653
$a
Corporate social performance
653
$a
Financial reporting quality
653
$a
Sustainability committees
655
7
$a
Electronic books.
$2
local
$3
554714
690
$a
0508
690
$a
0272
690
$a
0454
690
$a
0640
710
2
$a
ProQuest Information and Learning Co.
$3
1178819
710
2
$a
University of Massachusetts Boston.
$b
Business Administration (PhD).
$3
1191881
773
0
$t
Dissertations Abstracts International
$g
85-03A.
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30573050
$z
click for full text (PQDT)
筆 0 讀者評論
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館別
處理中
...
變更密碼[密碼必須為2種組合(英文和數字)及長度為10碼以上]
登入
第一次登入時,112年前入學、到職者,密碼請使用身分證號登入;112年後入學、到職者,密碼請使用身分證號"後六碼"登入,請注意帳號密碼有區分大小寫!
帳號(學號)
密碼
請在此電腦上記得個人資料
取消
忘記密碼? (請注意!您必須已在系統登記E-mail信箱方能使用。)