國立虎尾科技大學 |

Conceptualizing and Testing the Model of Ambidextrous Leadership : = Evidence from a Multi-Method Research Study..

Record Type:	Language materials, manuscript : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Conceptualizing and Testing the Model of Ambidextrous Leadership :/
Reminder of title:	Evidence from a Multi-Method Research Study..
Author:	Shon, DaHee.
Description:	1 online resource (117 pages)
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-10, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International80-10B.
Subject:	Psychology. -
Online resource:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9781392078846

Conceptualizing and Testing the Model of Ambidextrous Leadership : = Evidence from a Multi-Method Research Study..
Shon, DaHee.

Conceptualizing and Testing the Model of Ambidextrous Leadership :Evidence from a Multi-Method Research Study.. - 1 online resource (117 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-10, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Columbia University, 2019.

Includes bibliographical references

While leaders are constantly called to manage conflicting priorities in today's fast-changing environments, there is little research that examines how leaders can effectively explore new opportunities while simultaneously exploiting current advantages. Yet, management researchers have long shown that organizations that are ambidextrous---by balancing exploration and exploitation activities---are more innovative and successful. However, this concept of ambidexterity has not been investigated at the leadership level to a great extent, which poses limited practical implications for organizations. Further, there has been a lack of clarity around what constitutes and how to operationalize ambidexterity in the literature. The current research attempts to address these gaps by proposing a preliminary model of ambidextrous leadership. This model is then embedded in a leadership process model to help understand the underlying process of what may predict and result from ambidextrous leadership. The pilot and Study 1 leveraged self-report and experimental vignette survey methods, and the results from these studies provided preliminary evidence for the validity of the two constructs, exploration and exploitation. The results also demonstrated the impact of a promotion and prevention regulatory focus on exploration and exploitation, respectively, while showing almost no support for the effects of switching on leadership perceptions. The results from Study 2---which leveraged CEOs' letters to shareholders in the annual reports of S&P 500 companies---provided limited support for the positive effects of achieving high levels of exploration and exploitation compared to being high on only one of them or low on both. Finally, based on the findings from three studies, theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9781392078846Subjects--Topical Terms:

555998
Psychology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

AIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Conceptualizing and Testing the Model of Ambidextrous Leadership : = Evidence from a Multi-Method Research Study..
LDR:03448ntm a22005057 4500 001 1144407
005 20240611104218.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 250605s2019 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9781392078846
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI13862089
035 $a (MiAaPQ)columbia:15225
035 $a AAI13862089
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Shon, DaHee. $3 1469413
245 1 0 $a Conceptualizing and Testing the Model of Ambidextrous Leadership : $b Evidence from a Multi-Method Research Study..
264 0 $c 2019
300 $a 1 online resource (117 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-10, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Debra Noumair.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Columbia University, 2019.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a While leaders are constantly called to manage conflicting priorities in today's fast-changing environments, there is little research that examines how leaders can effectively explore new opportunities while simultaneously exploiting current advantages. Yet, management researchers have long shown that organizations that are ambidextrous---by balancing exploration and exploitation activities---are more innovative and successful. However, this concept of ambidexterity has not been investigated at the leadership level to a great extent, which poses limited practical implications for organizations. Further, there has been a lack of clarity around what constitutes and how to operationalize ambidexterity in the literature. The current research attempts to address these gaps by proposing a preliminary model of ambidextrous leadership. This model is then embedded in a leadership process model to help understand the underlying process of what may predict and result from ambidextrous leadership. The pilot and Study 1 leveraged self-report and experimental vignette survey methods, and the results from these studies provided preliminary evidence for the validity of the two constructs, exploration and exploitation. The results also demonstrated the impact of a promotion and prevention regulatory focus on exploration and exploitation, respectively, while showing almost no support for the effects of switching on leadership perceptions. The results from Study 2---which leveraged CEOs' letters to shareholders in the annual reports of S&P 500 companies---provided limited support for the positive effects of achieving high levels of exploration and exploitation compared to being high on only one of them or low on both. Finally, based on the findings from three studies, theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2024
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Psychology. $3 555998
653 $a A
653 $a Ambidexterity
653 $a Ambidextrous
653 $a Conceptualizing
653 $a Evidence
653 $a Exploitation
653 $a Exploration
653 $a Leadership
653 $a Method
653 $a Model
653 $a Multi
653 $a Research
653 $a Study
653 $a Testing
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0621
690 $a 0454
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a Columbia University. $b Social-Organizational Psychology. $3 1192904
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 80-10B.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13862089 $z click for full text (PQDT)