國立虎尾科技大學 |

Transforming Errors into Learning Opportunities in Simulation-Based Learning.

Record Type:	Language materials, manuscript : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Transforming Errors into Learning Opportunities in Simulation-Based Learning./
Author:	Letelier, Evelyn Palominos.
Description:	1 online resource (232 pages)
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-04, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International85-04B.
Subject:	Problem solving. -
Online resource:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798380492812

Transforming Errors into Learning Opportunities in Simulation-Based Learning.
Letelier, Evelyn Palominos.

Transforming Errors into Learning Opportunities in Simulation-Based Learning. - 1 online resource (232 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-04, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Technology Sydney (Australia), 2022.

Includes bibliographical references

This thesis explores how productive failure simulations influence nursing students' learning, perceptions and satisfaction compared with traditional simulations. Simulation-based learning enables learners to make mistakes and learn from them without compromising real patients' safety. Productive failure is a pedagogical approach that allows students to make mistakes as they solve novel learning tasks before receiving instruction. Productive failure simulations comprise a simulation followed by instruction, which contrasts with direct instruction simulations that begin with instruction followed by the simulation. Productive failure has facilitated meaningful learning outcomes in diverse educational settings, but no previous studies have examined the impact of productive failure in nursing simulation. To fill this research gap, an exploratory, sequential mixed-methods design with a three-stage approach was used.The first stage of the study, an integrative literature review, explored healthcare students' perceptions of making errors in simulation. It identified that supporting students to take responsibility for their mistakes is critical to moderating the negative impact of making errors and transforming them into learning opportunities.The second stage of this study resulted in the Learning from Errors conceptual model. Building on productive failure and error management training approaches, the model was designed to inform healthcare simulations that explicitly embrace learning from errors. This model includes the following elements: normalisation of errors, challenging simulation scenarios, self-directed learning, collaborative teamwork, and comparison with best practice.The third stage of this study evaluated nursing students' learning from and satisfaction with productive failure simulations compared to direct instruction simulations and explored students' perceptions of productive failure simulations. Participants were randomly allocated to either a productive failure group (n = 181) or a direct instruction group (n = 163). Quantitative data included knowledge tests measuring declarative knowledge, explanatory knowledge and transfer of learning, and the Satisfaction with Simulation Experience scale. Qualitative data involved interviews with students in the productive failure group.For explanatory knowledge and transfer of learning, the productive failure group outperformed the direct instruction group. This group also scored significantly higher on the satisfaction items related to reflection on practice and clinical learning. The qualitative results identified the following themes: the benefits of simulation prior to instruction; the value of performing a second simulation; and the importance of normalising errors.This doctoral study demonstrated that productive failure simulations improve nursing students' learning, perceptions and satisfaction levels. The thesis concludes with implications for nursing education, directions for further research, and recommendations for future practice.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798380492812Subjects--Topical Terms:

527887
Problem solving.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Transforming Errors into Learning Opportunities in Simulation-Based Learning.
LDR:04412ntm a22003977 4500 001 1144649
005 20240611104329.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 250605s2022 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798380492812
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30610693
035 $a (MiAaPQ)TechSydney10453168660
035 $a AAI30610693
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Letelier, Evelyn Palominos. $3 1469750
245 1 0 $a Transforming Errors into Learning Opportunities in Simulation-Based Learning.
264 0 $c 2022
300 $a 1 online resource (232 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-04, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Levett-Jones, Tracy.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Technology Sydney (Australia), 2022.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a This thesis explores how productive failure simulations influence nursing students' learning, perceptions and satisfaction compared with traditional simulations. Simulation-based learning enables learners to make mistakes and learn from them without compromising real patients' safety. Productive failure is a pedagogical approach that allows students to make mistakes as they solve novel learning tasks before receiving instruction. Productive failure simulations comprise a simulation followed by instruction, which contrasts with direct instruction simulations that begin with instruction followed by the simulation. Productive failure has facilitated meaningful learning outcomes in diverse educational settings, but no previous studies have examined the impact of productive failure in nursing simulation. To fill this research gap, an exploratory, sequential mixed-methods design with a three-stage approach was used.The first stage of the study, an integrative literature review, explored healthcare students' perceptions of making errors in simulation. It identified that supporting students to take responsibility for their mistakes is critical to moderating the negative impact of making errors and transforming them into learning opportunities.The second stage of this study resulted in the Learning from Errors conceptual model. Building on productive failure and error management training approaches, the model was designed to inform healthcare simulations that explicitly embrace learning from errors. This model includes the following elements: normalisation of errors, challenging simulation scenarios, self-directed learning, collaborative teamwork, and comparison with best practice.The third stage of this study evaluated nursing students' learning from and satisfaction with productive failure simulations compared to direct instruction simulations and explored students' perceptions of productive failure simulations. Participants were randomly allocated to either a productive failure group (n = 181) or a direct instruction group (n = 163). Quantitative data included knowledge tests measuring declarative knowledge, explanatory knowledge and transfer of learning, and the Satisfaction with Simulation Experience scale. Qualitative data involved interviews with students in the productive failure group.For explanatory knowledge and transfer of learning, the productive failure group outperformed the direct instruction group. This group also scored significantly higher on the satisfaction items related to reflection on practice and clinical learning. The qualitative results identified the following themes: the benefits of simulation prior to instruction; the value of performing a second simulation; and the importance of normalising errors.This doctoral study demonstrated that productive failure simulations improve nursing students' learning, perceptions and satisfaction levels. The thesis concludes with implications for nursing education, directions for further research, and recommendations for future practice.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2024
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Problem solving. $3 527887
650 4 $a Nursing education. $3 1469751
650 4 $a Failure. $3 1365603
650 4 $a Constructivism. $3 1372643
650 4 $a Success. $3 571577
650 4 $a Clinical medicine. $3 673808
650 4 $a Ethics. $3 555769
650 4 $a Teachers. $3 881385
650 4 $a Skills. $3 1207328
650 4 $a Patients. $3 963142
650 4 $a Error correction & detection. $3 1466162
650 4 $a Nursing care. $3 963534
650 4 $a Flexibility. $3 1466262
650 4 $a Design. $3 595500
650 4 $a Education. $3 555912
650 4 $a Health education. $3 585977
650 4 $a Higher education. $3 1148448
650 4 $a Medicine. $3 644133
650 4 $a Nursing. $3 563081
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0394
690 $a 0389
690 $a 0515
690 $a 0680
690 $a 0745
690 $a 0564
690 $a 0569
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a University of Technology Sydney (Australia). $3 1465278
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 85-04B.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30610693 $z click for full text (PQDT)