國立虎尾科技大學 |

Mapping the differentiated consensus of the joint declaration

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Mapping the differentiated consensus of the joint declaration/ by Jakob Karl Rinderknecht.
Author:	Rinderknecht, Jakob Karl.
Published:	Cham :Springer International Publishing : : 2016.,
Description:	ix, 281 p. :ill., digital ; : 24 cm.;
Contained By:	Springer eBooks
Subject:	Concord - Religious aspects -
Online resource:	http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40099-0
ISBN:	9783319400990

Mapping the differentiated consensus of the joint declaration
Rinderknecht, Jakob Karl.

Mapping the differentiated consensus of the joint declaration[electronic resource] /by Jakob Karl Rinderknecht. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2016. - ix, 281 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - Pathways for ecumenical and interreligious dialogue. - Pathways for ecumenical and interreligious dialogue..

Introduction. The Problem Of Ecclesial Disunion -- Part I. The Joint Declaration: History & Critiques -- 1. Justification And Anthropology In The Jddj -- 2. The Problem Of Differentiated Consensus -- Part II. Consensus And Conceptual Mapping -- 3. What Is Ecumenical Consensus? -- 4. Consensus Despite Difference -- 5. Cognitive Linguistics And Consensus -- 6. Cognitive Linguistics And Theology -- Part III. Mapping The Differentiated Consensus In The Jddj -- 7. Mapping The Catholic Blend: Trent & Concupiscence -- 8. The Catholic Blend Sin And The Jddj -- 9. Mapping The Lutheran Blend: Simul Iustus Et Peccator -- 10. The Lutheran Blend Sin And The Jddj -- Conclusion. Differentiated Consensus In The Jddj.

This book uses the insights of cognitive linguistics to argue for the possibility of differentiated consensus between separated churches. The Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification, signed by the Lutheran World Federation and the Roman Catholic Church in 1999, represents the high water mark of the twentieth-century ecumenical movement. It declares that the sixteenth-century condemnations related to justification do not condemn the teachings of the partner church. Some critics reject the agreement, arguing that a consensus that is differentiated is not actually a consensus. In this book, Jakob Karl Rinderknecht shows that mapping the "cognitive blends" that structure meaning can reveal underlying agreement within apparent theological contradictions. He traces Lutheran and Catholic positions on sin in the baptized, especially the Lutheran simul iustus et peccator and the Catholic insistence that concupiscence in the baptized is not sin. He demonstrates that the JDDJ reconciles these positions, and therefore that a truly differentiated consensus is possible.

ISBN: 9783319400990

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-319-40099-0doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

1115071
Concord
--Religious aspects

LC Class. No.: BV4647.C6

Dewey Class. No.: 231.044

Mapping the differentiated consensus of the joint declaration
LDR:02813nam a2200325 a 4500 001 867895
003 DE-He213
005 20161010084410.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 170720s2016 gw s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783319400990 $q (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783319400983 $q (paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-319-40099-0 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-319-40099-0
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a BV4647.C6
072 7 $a HRCM $2 bicssc
072 7 $a REL067000 $2 bisacsh
082 0 4 $a 231.044 $2 23
090 $a BV4647.C6 $b R579 2016
100 1 $a Rinderknecht, Jakob Karl. $3 1115070
245 1 0 $a Mapping the differentiated consensus of the joint declaration $h [electronic resource] / $c by Jakob Karl Rinderknecht.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan, $c 2016.
300 $a ix, 281 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a Pathways for ecumenical and interreligious dialogue
505 0 $a Introduction. The Problem Of Ecclesial Disunion -- Part I. The Joint Declaration: History & Critiques -- 1. Justification And Anthropology In The Jddj -- 2. The Problem Of Differentiated Consensus -- Part II. Consensus And Conceptual Mapping -- 3. What Is Ecumenical Consensus? -- 4. Consensus Despite Difference -- 5. Cognitive Linguistics And Consensus -- 6. Cognitive Linguistics And Theology -- Part III. Mapping The Differentiated Consensus In The Jddj -- 7. Mapping The Catholic Blend: Trent & Concupiscence -- 8. The Catholic Blend Sin And The Jddj -- 9. Mapping The Lutheran Blend: Simul Iustus Et Peccator -- 10. The Lutheran Blend Sin And The Jddj -- Conclusion. Differentiated Consensus In The Jddj.
520 $a This book uses the insights of cognitive linguistics to argue for the possibility of differentiated consensus between separated churches. The Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification, signed by the Lutheran World Federation and the Roman Catholic Church in 1999, represents the high water mark of the twentieth-century ecumenical movement. It declares that the sixteenth-century condemnations related to justification do not condemn the teachings of the partner church. Some critics reject the agreement, arguing that a consensus that is differentiated is not actually a consensus. In this book, Jakob Karl Rinderknecht shows that mapping the "cognitive blends" that structure meaning can reveal underlying agreement within apparent theological contradictions. He traces Lutheran and Catholic positions on sin in the baptized, especially the Lutheran simul iustus et peccator and the Catholic insistence that concupiscence in the baptized is not sin. He demonstrates that the JDDJ reconciles these positions, and therefore that a truly differentiated consensus is possible.
650 0 $a Concord $x Religious aspects $x Christianity. $3 1115071
650 0 $a Spiritual life $x Christianity. $3 595585
650 1 4 $a Religious Studies. $3 678071
650 2 4 $a Christian Theology. $3 1110937
650 2 4 $a Comparative Religion. $3 1105154
650 2 4 $a Philosophy of Religion. $3 671576
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 593884
773 0 $t Springer eBooks
830 0 $a Pathways for ecumenical and interreligious dialogue. $3 1105153
856 4 0 $u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40099-0
950 $a Religion and Philosophy (Springer-41175)