國立虎尾科技大學 |

An Externalist Approach to Epistemic Responsibility = Intellectual Norms and their Application to Epistemic Peer Disagreement /

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	An Externalist Approach to Epistemic Responsibility/ by Andrea Robitzsch.
Reminder of title:	Intellectual Norms and their Application to Epistemic Peer Disagreement /
Author:	Robitzsch, Andrea.
Description:	XIV, 227 p. 13 illus.online resource. :
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
Subject:	Epistemology. -
Online resource:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19077-4
ISBN:	9783030190774

An Externalist Approach to Epistemic Responsibility = Intellectual Norms and their Application to Epistemic Peer Disagreement /
Robitzsch, Andrea.

An Externalist Approach to Epistemic ResponsibilityIntellectual Norms and their Application to Epistemic Peer Disagreement /[electronic resource] :by Andrea Robitzsch. - 1st ed. 2019. - XIV, 227 p. 13 illus.online resource. - Synthese Library, Studies in Epistemology, Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science,4110166-6991 ;. - Synthese Library, Studies in Epistemology, Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science,359.

Chapter 1. Doxastic responsibility and direct doxastic control -- Chapter 2. An approach to indirect doxastic responsibility -- Chapter 3. Intellectual norms and epistemic normativity -- Chapter 4. What should we do in the face of epistemic peer disagreement?.

This monograph provides a novel reliabilist approach to epistemic responsibility assessment. The author presents unique arguments for the epistemic significance of belief-influencing actions and omissions. She grounds her proposal in indirect doxastic control. The book consists of four chapters. The first two chapters look at the different ways in which an agent might control the revision, retention, or rejection of her beliefs. They provide a systematic overview of the different approaches to doxastic control and contain a thorough study of reasons-responsive approaches to direct and indirect doxastic control. The third chapter provides a reliabilist approach to epistemic responsibility assessment which is based on indirect doxastic control. In the fourth chapter, the author examines epistemic peer disagreement and applies her reliabilist approach to epistemic responsibility assessment to this debate. She argues that the epistemic significance of peer disagreement does not only rely on the way in which an agent should revise her belief in the face of disagreement, it also relies on the way in which an agent should act. This book deals with questions of meliorative epistemology in general and with questions concerning doxastic responsibility and epistemic responsibility assessment in particular. It will appeal to graduate students and researchers with an interest in epistemology.

ISBN: 9783030190774

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-030-19077-4doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

671538
Epistemology.

LC Class. No.: BD143-237

Dewey Class. No.: 120

An Externalist Approach to Epistemic Responsibility = Intellectual Norms and their Application to Epistemic Peer Disagreement /
LDR:03195nam a22004095i 4500 001 1015620
003 DE-He213
005 20200813151508.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 210106s2019 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020 $a 9783030190774 $9 978-3-030-19077-4
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-030-19077-4 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-030-19077-4
050 4 $a BD143-237
072 7 $a HPK $2 bicssc
072 7 $a PHI004000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a QDTK $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 120 $2 23
100 1 $a Robitzsch, Andrea. $4 aut $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut $3 1228788
245 1 3 $a An Externalist Approach to Epistemic Responsibility $h [electronic resource] : $b Intellectual Norms and their Application to Epistemic Peer Disagreement / $c by Andrea Robitzsch.
250 $a 1st ed. 2019.
264 1 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2019.
300 $a XIV, 227 p. 13 illus. $b online resource.
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
347 $a text file $b PDF $2 rda
490 1 $a Synthese Library, Studies in Epistemology, Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science, $x 0166-6991 ; $v 411
505 0 $a Chapter 1. Doxastic responsibility and direct doxastic control -- Chapter 2. An approach to indirect doxastic responsibility -- Chapter 3. Intellectual norms and epistemic normativity -- Chapter 4. What should we do in the face of epistemic peer disagreement?.
520 $a This monograph provides a novel reliabilist approach to epistemic responsibility assessment. The author presents unique arguments for the epistemic significance of belief-influencing actions and omissions. She grounds her proposal in indirect doxastic control. The book consists of four chapters. The first two chapters look at the different ways in which an agent might control the revision, retention, or rejection of her beliefs. They provide a systematic overview of the different approaches to doxastic control and contain a thorough study of reasons-responsive approaches to direct and indirect doxastic control. The third chapter provides a reliabilist approach to epistemic responsibility assessment which is based on indirect doxastic control. In the fourth chapter, the author examines epistemic peer disagreement and applies her reliabilist approach to epistemic responsibility assessment to this debate. She argues that the epistemic significance of peer disagreement does not only rely on the way in which an agent should revise her belief in the face of disagreement, it also relies on the way in which an agent should act. This book deals with questions of meliorative epistemology in general and with questions concerning doxastic responsibility and epistemic responsibility assessment in particular. It will appeal to graduate students and researchers with an interest in epistemology.
650 0 $a Epistemology. $3 671538
650 0 $a Psychology. $3 555998
650 0 $a Social sciences—Philosophy. $3 1254447
650 0 $a Personality. $3 556406
650 0 $a Social psychology. $3 554804
650 0 $a Religion and sociology. $3 578047
650 2 4 $a General Psychology. $3 668194
650 2 4 $a Social Philosophy. $3 1104901
650 2 4 $a Personality and Social Psychology. $3 768511
650 2 4 $a Religion and Society. $3 1105155
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 593884
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783030190767
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783030190781
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783030190798
830 0 $a Synthese Library, Studies in Epistemology, Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science, $x 0166-6991 ; $v 359 $3 1257256
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19077-4
912 $a ZDB-2-REP
912 $a ZDB-2-SXPR
950 $a Religion and Philosophy (SpringerNature-41175)
950 $a Philosophy and Religion (R0) (SpringerNature-43725)