國立虎尾科技大學 |

Discussing Cognitive Neuroscience = Psychology, Neurophysiology, and Philosophy on the Mind, Body and Brain /

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Discussing Cognitive Neuroscience/ by Gerhard Benetka, Hans Werbik.
Reminder of title:	Psychology, Neurophysiology, and Philosophy on the Mind, Body and Brain /
Author:	Benetka, Gerhard.
other author:	Werbik, Hans.
Description:	VII, 171 p. 3 illus.online resource. :
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
Subject:	Cognitive psychology. -
Online resource:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71040-8
ISBN:	9783030710408

Discussing Cognitive Neuroscience = Psychology, Neurophysiology, and Philosophy on the Mind, Body and Brain /
Benetka, Gerhard.

Discussing Cognitive NeurosciencePsychology, Neurophysiology, and Philosophy on the Mind, Body and Brain /[electronic resource] :by Gerhard Benetka, Hans Werbik. - 1st ed. 2021. - VII, 171 p. 3 illus.online resource. - Annals of Theoretical Psychology,172512-2207 ;. - Annals of Theoretical Psychology,17.

Chapter 1. Critique of neuropsychology – A polemic -- Chapter 2. Living body (Leib) or physical dataset? Antonio Damsio’s and Thomas Fuchs’s holistic conception of the human being as opposite standpoint to reductionist models -- Chapter 3. The person and the brain -- Chapter 4. The neuropsychological discourse in philosophical critique - Bennett/Hacker and the consequences -- Chapter 5. Persistent biologism and the misuse of neuropsychology – an activity-theoretical contribution -- Chapter 6. Measuring free will with the readiness potential? New data on an old misunderstanding -- Chapter 7. The brain as protagonist – Without the brain all is nothing -- Chapter 8. Is it possible to simulate “thought”?

The sciences philosophy, psychology and neuroscience share the basis that all refer to the human being. Therefore, an interdisciplinary collaboration would be desirable. The exchange of criticism is an essential requirement for interdisciplinary collaboration. Criticism must be heard and – if possible – considered. Indeed, criticism can be valid or unwarranted. However, whether criticism is unwarranted can only emerge from discussion and conversation. In the discussion of cognitive neuroscience, some criticism can easily be considered (such as the mereological fallacy that represents that talking about the person is substituted with talking bout the brain). Another issue for an interdisciplinary discussion of cognitive neuroscience is the interpretation of the readiness potential including re-considering Benjamin Libet’s classic experiments. Additionally, a critical discussion on cognitive neuroscience must address ethical questions, such as the possibility of the abuse of neuroscientific insight. .

ISBN: 9783030710408

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-030-71040-8doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

556029
Cognitive psychology.

LC Class. No.: BF201

Dewey Class. No.: 153

Discussing Cognitive Neuroscience = Psychology, Neurophysiology, and Philosophy on the Mind, Body and Brain /
LDR:03226nam a22004095i 4500 001 1059293
003 DE-He213
005 20220223213853.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 220414s2021 sz | s |||| 0|eng d
020 $a 9783030710408 $9 978-3-030-71040-8
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-030-71040-8 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-030-71040-8
050 4 $a BF201
072 7 $a JMR $2 bicssc
072 7 $a PSY008000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a JMR $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 153 $2 23
100 1 $a Benetka, Gerhard. $4 aut $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut $3 1201587
245 1 0 $a Discussing Cognitive Neuroscience $h [electronic resource] : $b Psychology, Neurophysiology, and Philosophy on the Mind, Body and Brain / $c by Gerhard Benetka, Hans Werbik.
250 $a 1st ed. 2021.
264 1 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2021.
300 $a VII, 171 p. 3 illus. $b online resource.
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
347 $a text file $b PDF $2 rda
490 1 $a Annals of Theoretical Psychology, $x 2512-2207 ; $v 17
505 0 $a Chapter 1. Critique of neuropsychology – A polemic -- Chapter 2. Living body (Leib) or physical dataset? Antonio Damsio’s and Thomas Fuchs’s holistic conception of the human being as opposite standpoint to reductionist models -- Chapter 3. The person and the brain -- Chapter 4. The neuropsychological discourse in philosophical critique - Bennett/Hacker and the consequences -- Chapter 5. Persistent biologism and the misuse of neuropsychology – an activity-theoretical contribution -- Chapter 6. Measuring free will with the readiness potential? New data on an old misunderstanding -- Chapter 7. The brain as protagonist – Without the brain all is nothing -- Chapter 8. Is it possible to simulate “thought”?
520 $a The sciences philosophy, psychology and neuroscience share the basis that all refer to the human being. Therefore, an interdisciplinary collaboration would be desirable. The exchange of criticism is an essential requirement for interdisciplinary collaboration. Criticism must be heard and – if possible – considered. Indeed, criticism can be valid or unwarranted. However, whether criticism is unwarranted can only emerge from discussion and conversation. In the discussion of cognitive neuroscience, some criticism can easily be considered (such as the mereological fallacy that represents that talking about the person is substituted with talking bout the brain). Another issue for an interdisciplinary discussion of cognitive neuroscience is the interpretation of the readiness potential including re-considering Benjamin Libet’s classic experiments. Additionally, a critical discussion on cognitive neuroscience must address ethical questions, such as the possibility of the abuse of neuroscientific insight. .
650 0 $a Cognitive psychology. $3 556029
650 0 $a Cognitive neuroscience. $3 557002
650 0 $a Cognitive science. $3 562114
650 0 $a Philosophy of mind. $3 555804
650 0 $a Psychology. $3 555998
650 0 $a Social psychology. $3 554804
650 1 4 $a Cognitive Psychology. $3 593892
650 2 4 $a Cognitive Neuroscience. $3 1237796
650 2 4 $a Cognitive Science. $3 573190
650 2 4 $a Philosophy of Mind. $3 668203
650 2 4 $a Theoretical Psychology. $3 1366009
650 2 4 $a Cultural Psychology. $3 1366010
700 1 $a Werbik, Hans. $e author. $4 aut $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut $3 1359623
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 593884
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783030710392
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783030710415
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783030710422
830 0 $a Annals of Theoretical Psychology, $x 2512-2207 ; $v 17 $3 1366008
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71040-8
912 $a ZDB-2-BSP
912 $a ZDB-2-SXBP
950 $a Behavioral Science and Psychology (SpringerNature-41168)
950 $a Behavioral Science and Psychology (R0) (SpringerNature-43718)