國立虎尾科技大學 |

Policy Agendas in Autocracy, and Hybrid Regimes = The Case of Hungary /

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Policy Agendas in Autocracy, and Hybrid Regimes/ edited by Miklós Sebők, Zsolt Boda.
Reminder of title:	The Case of Hungary /
other author:	Sebők, Miklós.
Description:	XXI, 313 p. 28 illus., 9 illus. in color.online resource. :
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
Subject:	Political planning. -
Online resource:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73223-3
ISBN:	9783030732233

Policy Agendas in Autocracy, and Hybrid Regimes = The Case of Hungary /
Policy Agendas in Autocracy, and Hybrid RegimesThe Case of Hungary /[electronic resource] :edited by Miklós Sebők, Zsolt Boda. - 1st ed. 2021. - XXI, 313 p. 28 illus., 9 illus. in color.online resource. - Comparative Studies of Political Agendas,2947-8154. - Comparative Studies of Political Agendas,.

Part I: Introduction -- Chapter 1: Understanding agenda dynamics in non-democracies -- Part II: Theory and research strategy -- Chapter 2: The effect of political regimes on policy agendas: A theoretical framework -- Chapter 3: Hungarian regimes and their institutional characteristics -- Chapter 4: The data and methods of the Hungarian Comparative Agendas Project -- Part III. The dynamics of policy agendas in four regimes of hungarian history -- Chapter 5: The pre-war era of proto-parliamentarism (1867-1918) -- Chapter 6: The traditional authoritarianism of the Interwar period (1920-1944) -- Chapter 7: Agenda dynamics in Socialist autocracy (1957-1989) -- Chapter 8: The policy agendas of Liberal and Illiberal Democracy (1990-2018) -- Part IV: Discussion -- Chapter 9: The Effect of Regime Types on Policy Agendas in Hungary.

Over the past thirty years the comparative study of policy agendas under the aegis of the Comparative Agendas Project (CAP) has become one of the fastest growing sub-fields in policy research. Yet, similarly to policy studies in general, most of the agenda-setting literature focuses on well-established democracies. This edited volume offers a ground-breaking analysis of a hitherto less examined topic in comparative politics: the dynamics of policy agendas in Socialist autocracy and in hybrid regimes. We propose that policymaking in authoritarian and illiberal regimes is different from the practices of democracies which we analyse based on a unique historical policy agendas database built by the Hungarian CAP team at the Centre for Social Sciences in Budapest. We find that punctuated equilibrium theory offers a good description of policy dynamics regardless of policy regimes, yet punctuations are more pronounced in autocratic and illiberal settings. These regime types also share a tendency towards centralization, a less efficient use of public information and a suppression of democratic participation in the policy process. This book may be of interest to scholars and students of policy studies, agenda-setting and the politics of authoritarianism. Miklós Sebők is a Research Professor of the Centre of Social Sciences in Budapest, Hungary, and serves as the Director of the Institute for Political Science at the Centre for Social Sciences. Zsolt Boda is a Research Professor and Director General of the Centre for Social Sciences in Budapest, Hungary, as well as a part-time Professor in Political Science at ELTE University of Budapest, Hungary.

ISBN: 9783030732233

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-030-73223-3doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

576554
Political planning.

LC Class. No.: JF1525.P6

Dewey Class. No.: 320.6

Policy Agendas in Autocracy, and Hybrid Regimes = The Case of Hungary /
LDR:04010nam a22004095i 4500 001 1059311
003 DE-He213
005 20220322183301.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 220414s2021 sz | s |||| 0|eng d
020 $a 9783030732233 $9 978-3-030-73223-3
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-030-73223-3 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-030-73223-3
050 4 $a JF1525.P6
072 7 $a JPP $2 bicssc
072 7 $a POL028000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a JPP $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 320.6 $2 23
245 1 0 $a Policy Agendas in Autocracy, and Hybrid Regimes $h [electronic resource] : $b The Case of Hungary / $c edited by Miklós Sebők, Zsolt Boda.
250 $a 1st ed. 2021.
264 1 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan, $c 2021.
300 $a XXI, 313 p. 28 illus., 9 illus. in color. $b online resource.
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
347 $a text file $b PDF $2 rda
490 1 $a Comparative Studies of Political Agendas, $x 2947-8154
505 0 $a Part I: Introduction -- Chapter 1: Understanding agenda dynamics in non-democracies -- Part II: Theory and research strategy -- Chapter 2: The effect of political regimes on policy agendas: A theoretical framework -- Chapter 3: Hungarian regimes and their institutional characteristics -- Chapter 4: The data and methods of the Hungarian Comparative Agendas Project -- Part III. The dynamics of policy agendas in four regimes of hungarian history -- Chapter 5: The pre-war era of proto-parliamentarism (1867-1918) -- Chapter 6: The traditional authoritarianism of the Interwar period (1920-1944) -- Chapter 7: Agenda dynamics in Socialist autocracy (1957-1989) -- Chapter 8: The policy agendas of Liberal and Illiberal Democracy (1990-2018) -- Part IV: Discussion -- Chapter 9: The Effect of Regime Types on Policy Agendas in Hungary.
520 $a Over the past thirty years the comparative study of policy agendas under the aegis of the Comparative Agendas Project (CAP) has become one of the fastest growing sub-fields in policy research. Yet, similarly to policy studies in general, most of the agenda-setting literature focuses on well-established democracies. This edited volume offers a ground-breaking analysis of a hitherto less examined topic in comparative politics: the dynamics of policy agendas in Socialist autocracy and in hybrid regimes. We propose that policymaking in authoritarian and illiberal regimes is different from the practices of democracies which we analyse based on a unique historical policy agendas database built by the Hungarian CAP team at the Centre for Social Sciences in Budapest. We find that punctuated equilibrium theory offers a good description of policy dynamics regardless of policy regimes, yet punctuations are more pronounced in autocratic and illiberal settings. These regime types also share a tendency towards centralization, a less efficient use of public information and a suppression of democratic participation in the policy process. This book may be of interest to scholars and students of policy studies, agenda-setting and the politics of authoritarianism. Miklós Sebők is a Research Professor of the Centre of Social Sciences in Budapest, Hungary, and serves as the Director of the Institute for Political Science at the Centre for Social Sciences. Zsolt Boda is a Research Professor and Director General of the Centre for Social Sciences in Budapest, Hungary, as well as a part-time Professor in Political Science at ELTE University of Budapest, Hungary.
650 0 $a Political planning. $3 576554
650 0 $a Europe—Politics and government. $3 1253779
650 0 $a Comparative government. $3 555341
650 1 4 $a Public Policy. $3 591921
650 2 4 $a European Politics. $3 1107266
650 2 4 $a Comparative Politics. $3 884817
700 1 $a Sebők, Miklós. $e editor. $4 edt $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt $3 1360250
700 1 $a Boda, Zsolt. $e editor. $4 edt $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt $3 1360251
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 593884
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783030732226
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783030732240
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783030732257
830 0 $a Comparative Studies of Political Agendas, $x 2947-8154 $3 1366023
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73223-3
912 $a ZDB-2-POS
912 $a ZDB-2-SXPI
950 $a Political Science and International Studies (SpringerNature-41174)
950 $a Political Science and International Studies (R0) (SpringerNature-43724)