國立虎尾科技大學 |

COVID-19 Anti-Vaccine Misinformation Discourse on Twitter : = Influential Roles of Polarization and the 2020 US Presidential Election.

Record Type:	Language materials, manuscript : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	COVID-19 Anti-Vaccine Misinformation Discourse on Twitter :/
Reminder of title:	Influential Roles of Polarization and the 2020 US Presidential Election.
Author:	Xiao, Wei.
Description:	1 online resource (55 pages)
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-12.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International84-12.
Subject:	Communication. -
Online resource:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798379619299

COVID-19 Anti-Vaccine Misinformation Discourse on Twitter : = Influential Roles of Polarization and the 2020 US Presidential Election.
Xiao, Wei.

COVID-19 Anti-Vaccine Misinformation Discourse on Twitter :Influential Roles of Polarization and the 2020 US Presidential Election. - 1 online resource (55 pages)

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-12.

Thesis (M.A.)--Georgetown University, 2023.

Includes bibliographical references

This study investigated the politicization of COVID-19 vaccination on Twitter in the context of the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election. I analyzed 2,100 English tweets related to COVID-19 antivaccine misinformation from October 28th, 2020, to November 3rd, 2020 (one week before Election Day). Those tweets clustered into 12 topics.The result indicated that conspiracy theories about population control have raised concerns and become prevalent in perpetuating anti-vaccine beliefs. It also reflects the rise of a new trend in anti-vaccine topics. The study highlights the influence of partisan reasoning on vaccination decision-making in the context of a public health crisis caused by COVID-19, and the difficulty in correcting partisan-driven conspiracy theories and misinformation.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798379619299Subjects--Topical Terms:

556422
Communication.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Anti-vaxIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

COVID-19 Anti-Vaccine Misinformation Discourse on Twitter : = Influential Roles of Polarization and the 2020 US Presidential Election.
LDR:02191ntm a22004097 4500 001 1142932
005 20240513061027.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 250605s2023 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798379619299
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30421850
035 $a AAI30421850
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Xiao, Wei. $3 1467462
245 1 0 $a COVID-19 Anti-Vaccine Misinformation Discourse on Twitter : $b Influential Roles of Polarization and the 2020 US Presidential Election.
264 0 $c 2023
300 $a 1 online resource (55 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-12.
500 $a Advisor: Owen, Diana.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--Georgetown University, 2023.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a This study investigated the politicization of COVID-19 vaccination on Twitter in the context of the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election. I analyzed 2,100 English tweets related to COVID-19 antivaccine misinformation from October 28th, 2020, to November 3rd, 2020 (one week before Election Day). Those tweets clustered into 12 topics.The result indicated that conspiracy theories about population control have raised concerns and become prevalent in perpetuating anti-vaccine beliefs. It also reflects the rise of a new trend in anti-vaccine topics. The study highlights the influence of partisan reasoning on vaccination decision-making in the context of a public health crisis caused by COVID-19, and the difficulty in correcting partisan-driven conspiracy theories and misinformation.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2024
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Communication. $3 556422
650 4 $a Political science. $3 558774
650 4 $a Information science. $3 561178
653 $a Anti-vax
653 $a COVID-19 vaccine
653 $a Disinformation
653 $a Ideology
653 $a Misinformation
653 $a Social media
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0459
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0723
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a Georgetown University. $b Communication, Culture & Technology. $3 1189407
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 84-12.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30421850 $z click for full text (PQDT)