國立虎尾科技大學 |

Party Coalitions and Partisan Behavior in the American Public.

Record Type:	Language materials, manuscript : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Party Coalitions and Partisan Behavior in the American Public./
Author:	Kane, John V.
Description:	1 online resource (195 pages)
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-05(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-05A(E).
Subject:	Political science. -
Online resource:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9780355468588

Party Coalitions and Partisan Behavior in the American Public.
Kane, John V.

Party Coalitions and Partisan Behavior in the American Public. - 1 online resource (195 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-05(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)

Includes bibliographical references

Scholars of American politics have long observed that the Democratic and Republican parties differ markedly in the types of people they attract and represent. Yet, research on the extent to which social differences between the party coalitions are consequential for citizens' political behavior remains limited. This dissertation seeks to address this gap with three separate manuscripts. In the first study, I rely upon a series of nationally representative data sets as well as a survey experiment and demonstrate that citizens accurately perceive which social groups support each party; that affect toward various politically-aligned groups is predictive of party identification and party identification strength; and, that associating a negatively-viewed group with a party lowers evaluations of, and psychological attachment to, that party. Consistent with previous theorizing, these results provide strong evidence that affect toward politicized groups structures citizens' partisan orientations. As such, an important implication of these findings is that the manner in which elites relate to their own party's coalition (or, "base") may affect partisans' support for these elites---a proposition I test directly in the second study using a series of survey experiments as well as data from national and state-level surveys. Having found that partisans are significantly more (less) supportive of outparty (inparty) elites who demonstrate disloyalty to their party's coalition, I report, in the third study, results from a content analysis that examined the extent to which mass media communicated relations between and within the party coalitions throughout the Obama presidency. Furthermore, I find that Republicans, while generally disinclined to consume news stories about President Obama, are particularly attracted to news stories in which Obama is reported to have alienated his political base. Taken together, the three manuscripts reveal how information regarding party coalitions can influence American public opinion, as well as how mass media supply such information to citizens. Given our present era of rising antipathy toward members of opposing party, this dissertation offers novel contributions to our collective understanding of partisanship, motivated reasoning, and political polarization in the United States.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9780355468588Subjects--Topical Terms:

558774
Political science.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Party Coalitions and Partisan Behavior in the American Public.
LDR:03612ntm a2200337Ki 4500 001 911719
005 20180531091028.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2017 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9780355468588
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10608665
035 $a (MiAaPQ)grad.sunysb:13383
035 $a AAI10608665
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ
099 $a TUL $f hyy $c available through World Wide Web
100 1 $a Kane, John V. $3 1183726
245 1 0 $a Party Coalitions and Partisan Behavior in the American Public.
264 0 $c 2017
300 $a 1 online resource (195 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-05(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Jason Barabas.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.) $c State University of New York at Stony Brook $d 2017.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Scholars of American politics have long observed that the Democratic and Republican parties differ markedly in the types of people they attract and represent. Yet, research on the extent to which social differences between the party coalitions are consequential for citizens' political behavior remains limited. This dissertation seeks to address this gap with three separate manuscripts. In the first study, I rely upon a series of nationally representative data sets as well as a survey experiment and demonstrate that citizens accurately perceive which social groups support each party; that affect toward various politically-aligned groups is predictive of party identification and party identification strength; and, that associating a negatively-viewed group with a party lowers evaluations of, and psychological attachment to, that party. Consistent with previous theorizing, these results provide strong evidence that affect toward politicized groups structures citizens' partisan orientations. As such, an important implication of these findings is that the manner in which elites relate to their own party's coalition (or, "base") may affect partisans' support for these elites---a proposition I test directly in the second study using a series of survey experiments as well as data from national and state-level surveys. Having found that partisans are significantly more (less) supportive of outparty (inparty) elites who demonstrate disloyalty to their party's coalition, I report, in the third study, results from a content analysis that examined the extent to which mass media communicated relations between and within the party coalitions throughout the Obama presidency. Furthermore, I find that Republicans, while generally disinclined to consume news stories about President Obama, are particularly attracted to news stories in which Obama is reported to have alienated his political base. Taken together, the three manuscripts reveal how information regarding party coalitions can influence American public opinion, as well as how mass media supply such information to citizens. Given our present era of rising antipathy toward members of opposing party, this dissertation offers novel contributions to our collective understanding of partisanship, motivated reasoning, and political polarization in the United States.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Political science. $3 558774
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0615
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a State University of New York at Stony Brook. $b Political Science. $3 1183727
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-05A(E).
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10608665 $z click for full text (PQDT)