國立虎尾科技大學 |

Efficacy of brief intervention telephone psychotherapy.

Record Type:	Language materials, manuscript : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Efficacy of brief intervention telephone psychotherapy./
Author:	Rhee, Wayne Kim.
Description:	1 online resource (147 pages)
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 62-11, Section: B, page: 5388.
Subject:	Clinical psychology. -
Online resource:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9780493454597

Efficacy of brief intervention telephone psychotherapy.
Rhee, Wayne Kim.

Efficacy of brief intervention telephone psychotherapy. - 1 online resource (147 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 62-11, Section: B, page: 5388.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Washington University in St. Louis, 2001.

Includes bibliographical references

This study evaluated the efficacy of two types of psychotherapy conducted by telephone. Clients (N = 55) for a telephone therapy program were screened and recruited from a pool of callers at a crisis hotline. Clients were randomly assigned to either a waiting list control condition or one of two telephone therapy conditions (Solution Focused Brief Therapy or Common Factors Therapy). Batteries of assessment measures were administered before and after therapy, with a follow-up assessment 8 to 12 months after termination. It was hypothesized that improvement would be significantly higher in the two therapy conditions compared to the waitlist control condition. It was also hypothesized that improvement would be significantly higher in the Solution Focused Brief Therapy condition compared to the Common Factors Therapy condition. These hypotheses were evaluated by conducting a hierarchical multiple regression to compare the mean differences between conditions before and after therapy. It was found that improvement was significantly higher in the 2 treatment conditions compared to the waitlist control condition. It was not found that improvement was higher in SFBT compared to CFT. Significance of these findings and future research directions are discussed.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9780493454597Subjects--Topical Terms:

649607
Clinical psychology.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Efficacy of brief intervention telephone psychotherapy.
LDR:02390ntm a2200301K 4500 001 912218
005 20180608102942.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2001 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9780493454597
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3032738
035 $a AAI3032738
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Rhee, Wayne Kim. $3 1184476
245 1 0 $a Efficacy of brief intervention telephone psychotherapy.
264 0 $c 2001
300 $a 1 online resource (147 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 62-11, Section: B, page: 5388.
500 $a Chairs: Michael M. Merbaum; Michael J. Strube.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Washington University in St. Louis, 2001.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a This study evaluated the efficacy of two types of psychotherapy conducted by telephone. Clients (N = 55) for a telephone therapy program were screened and recruited from a pool of callers at a crisis hotline. Clients were randomly assigned to either a waiting list control condition or one of two telephone therapy conditions (Solution Focused Brief Therapy or Common Factors Therapy). Batteries of assessment measures were administered before and after therapy, with a follow-up assessment 8 to 12 months after termination. It was hypothesized that improvement would be significantly higher in the two therapy conditions compared to the waitlist control condition. It was also hypothesized that improvement would be significantly higher in the Solution Focused Brief Therapy condition compared to the Common Factors Therapy condition. These hypotheses were evaluated by conducting a hierarchical multiple regression to compare the mean differences between conditions before and after therapy. It was found that improvement was significantly higher in the 2 treatment conditions compared to the waitlist control condition. It was not found that improvement was higher in SFBT compared to CFT. Significance of these findings and future research directions are discussed.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Clinical psychology. $3 649607
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0622
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a Washington University in St. Louis. $3 1184477
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3032738 $z click for full text (PQDT)