Language:
English
繁體中文
Help
Login
Back
Switch To:
Labeled
|
MARC Mode
|
ISBD
Modest Nonconceptualism = Epistemolo...
~
SpringerLink (Online service)
Modest Nonconceptualism = Epistemology, Phenomenology, and Content /
Record Type:
Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:
Modest Nonconceptualism/ by Eva Schmidt.
Reminder of title:
Epistemology, Phenomenology, and Content /
Author:
Schmidt, Eva.
Description:
XI, 268 p.online resource. :
Contained By:
Springer Nature eBook
Subject:
Philosophy of mind. -
Online resource:
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18902-4
ISBN:
9783319189024
Modest Nonconceptualism = Epistemology, Phenomenology, and Content /
Schmidt, Eva.
Modest Nonconceptualism
Epistemology, Phenomenology, and Content /[electronic resource] :by Eva Schmidt. - 1st ed. 2015. - XI, 268 p.online resource. - Studies in Brain and Mind,81573-4536 ;. - Studies in Brain and Mind,8.
1 Introduction -- 2 Content, Concepts, Concept Possession -- 3 Nonconceptual Content -- 4 Arguments from Phenomenology -- 5 The Argument from Contradictory Contents -- 6 Arguments from Concept Possession -- 7 The Epistemological Objection -- 8 The Objection from Objectivity -- 9 Modest Nonconceptualism Vindicated.
The author defends nonconceptualism, the claim that perceptual experience is nonconceptual and has nonconceptual content. Continuing the heated and complex debate surrounding this topic over the past two decades, she offers a sustained defense of a novel version of the view, Modest Nonconceptualism, and provides a systematic overview of some of the central controversies in the debate. The volume starts off with an explication of the notion of nonconceptual content and a distinction between nonconceptualist views of different strengths, then the author goes on to defend participants in the debate over nonconceptual content against the allegation that their failure to distinguish between a state view and a content view of (non)conceptualism leads to fatal problems for their views. Next, she makes a case for nonconceptualism by refining some of the central arguments for the view, such as the arguments from fineness of grain, from contradictory contents, from animal and infant perception, and from concept acquisition. Then, two central objections against nonconceptualism are rebutted in a novel way: the epistemological objection and the objection from objectivity. Modest Nonconceptualism allows for perceptual experiences to involve some conceptual elements. It emphasizes the relevance of concept employment for an understanding of conceptual and nonconceptual mental states and identifies the nonconceptual content of experience with scenario content. It insists on the possibility of genuine content-bearing perceptual experience without concept possession and is thus in line with the Autonomy Thesis. Finally, it includes an account of perceptual justification that relies on the external contents of experience and belief, yet is compatible with epistemological internalism.
ISBN: 9783319189024
Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-319-18902-4doiSubjects--Topical Terms:
555804
Philosophy of mind.
LC Class. No.: B53
Dewey Class. No.: 128.2
Modest Nonconceptualism = Epistemology, Phenomenology, and Content /
LDR
:03510nam a22004095i 4500
001
966559
003
DE-He213
005
20200919150123.0
007
cr nn 008mamaa
008
201211s2015 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020
$a
9783319189024
$9
978-3-319-18902-4
024
7
$a
10.1007/978-3-319-18902-4
$2
doi
035
$a
978-3-319-18902-4
050
4
$a
B53
072
7
$a
HPM
$2
bicssc
072
7
$a
PHI015000
$2
bisacsh
072
7
$a
QDTM
$2
thema
082
0 4
$a
128.2
$2
23
100
1
$a
Schmidt, Eva.
$4
aut
$4
http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
$3
1067265
245
1 0
$a
Modest Nonconceptualism
$h
[electronic resource] :
$b
Epistemology, Phenomenology, and Content /
$c
by Eva Schmidt.
250
$a
1st ed. 2015.
264
1
$a
Cham :
$b
Springer International Publishing :
$b
Imprint: Springer,
$c
2015.
300
$a
XI, 268 p.
$b
online resource.
336
$a
text
$b
txt
$2
rdacontent
337
$a
computer
$b
c
$2
rdamedia
338
$a
online resource
$b
cr
$2
rdacarrier
347
$a
text file
$b
PDF
$2
rda
490
1
$a
Studies in Brain and Mind,
$x
1573-4536 ;
$v
8
505
0
$a
1 Introduction -- 2 Content, Concepts, Concept Possession -- 3 Nonconceptual Content -- 4 Arguments from Phenomenology -- 5 The Argument from Contradictory Contents -- 6 Arguments from Concept Possession -- 7 The Epistemological Objection -- 8 The Objection from Objectivity -- 9 Modest Nonconceptualism Vindicated.
520
$a
The author defends nonconceptualism, the claim that perceptual experience is nonconceptual and has nonconceptual content. Continuing the heated and complex debate surrounding this topic over the past two decades, she offers a sustained defense of a novel version of the view, Modest Nonconceptualism, and provides a systematic overview of some of the central controversies in the debate. The volume starts off with an explication of the notion of nonconceptual content and a distinction between nonconceptualist views of different strengths, then the author goes on to defend participants in the debate over nonconceptual content against the allegation that their failure to distinguish between a state view and a content view of (non)conceptualism leads to fatal problems for their views. Next, she makes a case for nonconceptualism by refining some of the central arguments for the view, such as the arguments from fineness of grain, from contradictory contents, from animal and infant perception, and from concept acquisition. Then, two central objections against nonconceptualism are rebutted in a novel way: the epistemological objection and the objection from objectivity. Modest Nonconceptualism allows for perceptual experiences to involve some conceptual elements. It emphasizes the relevance of concept employment for an understanding of conceptual and nonconceptual mental states and identifies the nonconceptual content of experience with scenario content. It insists on the possibility of genuine content-bearing perceptual experience without concept possession and is thus in line with the Autonomy Thesis. Finally, it includes an account of perceptual justification that relies on the external contents of experience and belief, yet is compatible with epistemological internalism.
650
0
$a
Philosophy of mind.
$3
555804
650
0
$a
Epistemology.
$3
671538
650
1 4
$a
Philosophy of Mind.
$3
668203
710
2
$a
SpringerLink (Online service)
$3
593884
773
0
$t
Springer Nature eBook
776
0 8
$i
Printed edition:
$z
9783319189031
776
0 8
$i
Printed edition:
$z
9783319189017
776
0 8
$i
Printed edition:
$z
9783319371399
830
0
$a
Studies in Brain and Mind,
$x
1573-4536 ;
$v
8
$3
1262168
856
4 0
$u
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18902-4
912
$a
ZDB-2-SHU
912
$a
ZDB-2-SXPR
950
$a
Humanities, Social Sciences and Law (SpringerNature-11648)
950
$a
Philosophy and Religion (R0) (SpringerNature-43725)
based on 0 review(s)
Multimedia
Reviews
Add a review
and share your thoughts with other readers
Export
pickup library
Processing
...
Change password
Login