Language:
English
繁體中文
Help
Login
Back
Switch To:
Labeled
|
MARC Mode
|
ISBD
Paradigm Shift of Education Governan...
~
Wang, Yan.
Paradigm Shift of Education Governance in China = Two Compulsory Education Legislation Episodes: 1986 vs 2006 /
Record Type:
Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:
Paradigm Shift of Education Governance in China/ by Yan Wang.
Reminder of title:
Two Compulsory Education Legislation Episodes: 1986 vs 2006 /
Author:
Wang, Yan.
Description:
XVII, 159 p. 18 illus.online resource. :
Contained By:
Springer Nature eBook
Subject:
Educational policy. -
Online resource:
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-59515-2
ISBN:
9783662595152
Paradigm Shift of Education Governance in China = Two Compulsory Education Legislation Episodes: 1986 vs 2006 /
Wang, Yan.
Paradigm Shift of Education Governance in China
Two Compulsory Education Legislation Episodes: 1986 vs 2006 /[electronic resource] :by Yan Wang. - 1st ed. 2019. - XVII, 159 p. 18 illus.online resource.
Introduction -- Chapter 1 Evoluaiton of Basic Education in China -- Chapter 2 Collecting and Tackling Data -- Chapter 3 Reflecting on Theoretical Context -- Chapter 4 Episode I: The 1986 Legislation -- Chapter 5 Episode II: The 2006 Legislation -- Chapter 6 Analysing The Two Legislation Episodes -- Chapter 7 Paradigm Shif of Education Governance.
The book addresses the paradigm shift in education governance in China through a study of two legislation episodes in China: the 1986 Compulsory Education Law and the 2006 Compulsory Education Law Amendment. The research began with two broad questions: how was the Compulsory Education Law made and amended? Why was it made and amended? Using ethnographic interviews and documentary analysis as the main research methods, more specific questions on both legislative processes were delved into as the research evolved: What were the driving forces behind the 1986 and 2006 legislation? What values of compulsory education were assumed in their central decisions? What was the institutional rationale underpinning them? Data was collected through ethnographic interviews with key informants involved in the policymaking process. The research findings were analyzed and presented on the basis of narration analysis. The policymaking process of the legislation was then analyzed from three paradigms: agenda-setting, decision-making and organizational behavior. Finally, by examining the results of the previous stages of analysis, and further comparing the two cases, the research arrived at a theoretical framework for education governance that embraces three essential elements: political ideology, perceived value of education, and institutional rationale. A thorough analysis of the two legislative processes identified that the political ideology ‒ which shifted from efficiency-oriented economic well-being to equity-oriented social cohesion ‒ steered the agenda-setting of the compulsory education legislation. The perceived value of education reflects the role that education plays in development, changing from economic value to social value. The institutional rationale essentially determines strategies by which compulsory education materializes, with a variance from governing by goal and mobilization to governing by accountability and regulation. In conclusion, education governance in China witnessed a paradigm shift from “economic instrumentalism” to “social rationalism” between mid-1980s and 2006.
ISBN: 9783662595152
Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-662-59515-2doiSubjects--Topical Terms:
1200004
Educational policy.
LC Class. No.: LC8-6691
Dewey Class. No.: 379
Paradigm Shift of Education Governance in China = Two Compulsory Education Legislation Episodes: 1986 vs 2006 /
LDR
:03787nam a22003855i 4500
001
1006103
003
DE-He213
005
20200702161742.0
007
cr nn 008mamaa
008
210106s2019 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020
$a
9783662595152
$9
978-3-662-59515-2
024
7
$a
10.1007/978-3-662-59515-2
$2
doi
035
$a
978-3-662-59515-2
050
4
$a
LC8-6691
072
7
$a
JNF
$2
bicssc
072
7
$a
EDU034000
$2
bisacsh
072
7
$a
JNF
$2
thema
082
0 4
$a
379
$2
23
100
1
$a
Wang, Yan.
$4
aut
$4
http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
$3
1064741
245
1 0
$a
Paradigm Shift of Education Governance in China
$h
[electronic resource] :
$b
Two Compulsory Education Legislation Episodes: 1986 vs 2006 /
$c
by Yan Wang.
250
$a
1st ed. 2019.
264
1
$a
Berlin, Heidelberg :
$b
Springer Berlin Heidelberg :
$b
Imprint: Springer,
$c
2019.
300
$a
XVII, 159 p. 18 illus.
$b
online resource.
336
$a
text
$b
txt
$2
rdacontent
337
$a
computer
$b
c
$2
rdamedia
338
$a
online resource
$b
cr
$2
rdacarrier
347
$a
text file
$b
PDF
$2
rda
505
0
$a
Introduction -- Chapter 1 Evoluaiton of Basic Education in China -- Chapter 2 Collecting and Tackling Data -- Chapter 3 Reflecting on Theoretical Context -- Chapter 4 Episode I: The 1986 Legislation -- Chapter 5 Episode II: The 2006 Legislation -- Chapter 6 Analysing The Two Legislation Episodes -- Chapter 7 Paradigm Shif of Education Governance.
520
$a
The book addresses the paradigm shift in education governance in China through a study of two legislation episodes in China: the 1986 Compulsory Education Law and the 2006 Compulsory Education Law Amendment. The research began with two broad questions: how was the Compulsory Education Law made and amended? Why was it made and amended? Using ethnographic interviews and documentary analysis as the main research methods, more specific questions on both legislative processes were delved into as the research evolved: What were the driving forces behind the 1986 and 2006 legislation? What values of compulsory education were assumed in their central decisions? What was the institutional rationale underpinning them? Data was collected through ethnographic interviews with key informants involved in the policymaking process. The research findings were analyzed and presented on the basis of narration analysis. The policymaking process of the legislation was then analyzed from three paradigms: agenda-setting, decision-making and organizational behavior. Finally, by examining the results of the previous stages of analysis, and further comparing the two cases, the research arrived at a theoretical framework for education governance that embraces three essential elements: political ideology, perceived value of education, and institutional rationale. A thorough analysis of the two legislative processes identified that the political ideology ‒ which shifted from efficiency-oriented economic well-being to equity-oriented social cohesion ‒ steered the agenda-setting of the compulsory education legislation. The perceived value of education reflects the role that education plays in development, changing from economic value to social value. The institutional rationale essentially determines strategies by which compulsory education materializes, with a variance from governing by goal and mobilization to governing by accountability and regulation. In conclusion, education governance in China witnessed a paradigm shift from “economic instrumentalism” to “social rationalism” between mid-1980s and 2006.
650
0
$a
Educational policy.
$3
1200004
650
0
$a
Education and state.
$3
563302
650
0
$a
Political science.
$3
558774
650
1 4
$a
Educational Policy and Politics.
$3
683657
650
2 4
$a
Political Science.
$3
668850
710
2
$a
SpringerLink (Online service)
$3
593884
773
0
$t
Springer Nature eBook
776
0 8
$i
Printed edition:
$z
9783662595138
776
0 8
$i
Printed edition:
$z
9783662595145
856
4 0
$u
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-59515-2
912
$a
ZDB-2-EDA
912
$a
ZDB-2-SXED
950
$a
Education (SpringerNature-41171)
950
$a
Education (R0) (SpringerNature-43721)
based on 0 review(s)
Multimedia
Reviews
Add a review
and share your thoughts with other readers
Export
pickup library
Processing
...
Change password
Login