國立虎尾科技大學 |

Words Matter : = How Institutional Disruption Policies Reinforce White Power in Higher Education.

Record Type:	Language materials, manuscript : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Words Matter :/
Reminder of title:	How Institutional Disruption Policies Reinforce White Power in Higher Education.
Author:	Zanotto, Anton.
Description:	1 online resource (330 pages)
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-11, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International84-11A.
Subject:	Higher education administration. -
Online resource:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798379584672

Words Matter : = How Institutional Disruption Policies Reinforce White Power in Higher Education.
Zanotto, Anton.

Words Matter :How Institutional Disruption Policies Reinforce White Power in Higher Education. - 1 online resource (330 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-11, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Colorado State University, 2023.

Includes bibliographical references

Student conduct exists as the intersection of student development theory, legal compliance, and institutional policies. While literature in the K-12 and criminal legal system shows the way that policy has a disproportionately negative impact on Black, Indigenous, and other People of Color, there are few studies that do similar work in higher education. Furthermore, research in student conduct largely focuses on student learning and conduct administrator practices and does not consider the policies at the root of our practice. This study explores the campus discourse about disruption at eight institutions of higher education and uses a theoretical framework that uniquely considers the various nuances of this work. By centering the policies and using a critical policy discourse analysis methodology, I enter the discussion about how to create liberatory policy that subsequently supports the practice of many student conduct administrators. The subsequent model offers a set of guiding principles for liberatory policy revision and development for the future.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798379584672Subjects--Topical Terms:

1148709
Higher education administration.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Discourse analysisIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Words Matter : = How Institutional Disruption Policies Reinforce White Power in Higher Education.
LDR:02539ntm a2200421K 4500 001 1141045
005 20231130111556.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 250605s2023 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798379584672
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30310611
035 $a AAI30310611
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Zanotto, Anton. $3 1464618
245 1 0 $a Words Matter : $b How Institutional Disruption Policies Reinforce White Power in Higher Education.
264 0 $c 2023
300 $a 1 online resource (330 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-11, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Barone, Ryan ; McKelfresh, David.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Colorado State University, 2023.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Student conduct exists as the intersection of student development theory, legal compliance, and institutional policies. While literature in the K-12 and criminal legal system shows the way that policy has a disproportionately negative impact on Black, Indigenous, and other People of Color, there are few studies that do similar work in higher education. Furthermore, research in student conduct largely focuses on student learning and conduct administrator practices and does not consider the policies at the root of our practice. This study explores the campus discourse about disruption at eight institutions of higher education and uses a theoretical framework that uniquely considers the various nuances of this work. By centering the policies and using a critical policy discourse analysis methodology, I enter the discussion about how to create liberatory policy that subsequently supports the practice of many student conduct administrators. The subsequent model offers a set of guiding principles for liberatory policy revision and development for the future.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2024
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Higher education administration. $3 1148709
650 4 $a Law. $3 671705
650 4 $a Higher education. $3 1148448
650 4 $a Educational administration. $3 1148465
653 $a Discourse analysis
653 $a Disruption
653 $a Liberatory
653 $a Institutional policies
653 $a Student conduct
653 $a Administrator practices
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0446
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0745
690 $a 0514
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a Colorado State University. $b Education (School of ). $3 1464619
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 84-11A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30310611 $z click for full text (PQDT)