國立虎尾科技大學 |

The Three Rs of Online Learning : = Interpretive Views of the Social Practices of Reading, Rereading, and Revisiting.

Record Type:	Language materials, manuscript : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	The Three Rs of Online Learning :/
Reminder of title:	Interpretive Views of the Social Practices of Reading, Rereading, and Revisiting.
Author:	Wilton, Lesley.
Description:	1 online resource (299 pages)
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-04(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-04A(E).
Subject:	Educational technology. -
Online resource:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9780355456875

The Three Rs of Online Learning : = Interpretive Views of the Social Practices of Reading, Rereading, and Revisiting.
Wilton, Lesley.

The Three Rs of Online Learning :Interpretive Views of the Social Practices of Reading, Rereading, and Revisiting. - 1 online resource (299 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-04(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)

Includes bibliographical references

As participation in formal online learning continues to be more commonplace in higher education, high schools, and middle schools (Means, Toyama, Murphy, Bakia, & Jones, 2010), contextualized explorations of social practices important to learning in discussion-based online learning environments (DBOLEs) are called for. This research combines both online learning and literacy research perspectives by examining quantitative and qualitative data from an interpretive perspective to better understand the less visible, less studied, and typically less instructor-valued practices of reading, rereading, and revisiting (the 3 Rs) in DBOLEs. This study of the behaviours and opinions of 137 students, one instructor, and their 13,754 entries in eight online graduate education courses investigates the social practices of the 3Rs and those practices related to subject titles. Revisiting others' word-for-word ideas and creating/selecting information by subject titles are new literacy practices taking place in online learning that ordinarily do not have identical practices in face-to-face classrooms. These practices are essential to online learning and are important to understand. An instructor interview contributed thoughtful perspectives while documenting understandings of how learners' social practices can be supported and valued. Through an explanatory sequential mixed methods design, the findings are presented in three sub-study formats.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9780355456875Subjects--Topical Terms:

556755
Educational technology.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

The Three Rs of Online Learning : = Interpretive Views of the Social Practices of Reading, Rereading, and Revisiting.
LDR:03854ntm a2200385Ki 4500 001 909254
005 20180426101948.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2017 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9780355456875
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10261004
035 $a (MiAaPQ)toronto:15490
035 $a AAI10261004
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ
099 $a TUL $f hyy $c available through World Wide Web
100 1 $a Wilton, Lesley. $3 1179921
245 1 4 $a The Three Rs of Online Learning : $b Interpretive Views of the Social Practices of Reading, Rereading, and Revisiting.
264 0 $c 2017
300 $a 1 online resource (299 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-04(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Clare Brett.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.) $c University of Toronto (Canada) $d 2017.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a As participation in formal online learning continues to be more commonplace in higher education, high schools, and middle schools (Means, Toyama, Murphy, Bakia, & Jones, 2010), contextualized explorations of social practices important to learning in discussion-based online learning environments (DBOLEs) are called for. This research combines both online learning and literacy research perspectives by examining quantitative and qualitative data from an interpretive perspective to better understand the less visible, less studied, and typically less instructor-valued practices of reading, rereading, and revisiting (the 3 Rs) in DBOLEs. This study of the behaviours and opinions of 137 students, one instructor, and their 13,754 entries in eight online graduate education courses investigates the social practices of the 3Rs and those practices related to subject titles. Revisiting others' word-for-word ideas and creating/selecting information by subject titles are new literacy practices taking place in online learning that ordinarily do not have identical practices in face-to-face classrooms. These practices are essential to online learning and are important to understand. An instructor interview contributed thoughtful perspectives while documenting understandings of how learners' social practices can be supported and valued. Through an explanatory sequential mixed methods design, the findings are presented in three sub-study formats.
520 $a This study finds that participants revisit many entries, sometimes multiple times, to further their understandings or seek clarification, or participate socially in the online learning environment. As well, the findings suggest that creating subject titles is an important practice that influences the learning of both the author and the reader. These findings call for consideration of a pedagogical change in the value placed on these less visible practices, supported by instructional design modifications highlighting, for both instructors and students, the importance of reading and revisiting activities.
520 $a Finally, it may be valuable to consider more deeply exploring and documenting the social practices taking place in online learning in order to contribute to a potential lowercase theory of new literacies in online learning, under the wings of the evolving uppercase Dual-Level Theory of New Literacies (Leu, Kinzer, Coiro, Castek, & Henry, 2013). This research could be considered a contributing body of work.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Educational technology. $3 556755
650 4 $a Instructional design. $3 1148462
650 4 $a Pedagogy. $3 1148703
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0710
690 $a 0447
690 $a 0456
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a University of Toronto (Canada). $b Curriculum, Teaching and Learning. $3 1179756
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-04A(E).
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10261004 $z click for full text (PQDT)