Language:
English
繁體中文
Help
Login
Back
Switch To:
Labeled
|
MARC Mode
|
ISBD
Identifying Author Topic Stance in O...
~
Patterson, Gary.
Identifying Author Topic Stance in Online Discussion Forums.
Record Type:
Language materials, manuscript : Monograph/item
Title/Author:
Identifying Author Topic Stance in Online Discussion Forums./
Author:
Patterson, Gary.
Description:
1 online resource (173 pages)
Notes:
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-08(E), Section: A.
Contained By:
Dissertation Abstracts International79-08A(E).
Subject:
Linguistics. -
Online resource:
click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:
9780355811599
Identifying Author Topic Stance in Online Discussion Forums.
Patterson, Gary.
Identifying Author Topic Stance in Online Discussion Forums.
- 1 online resource (173 pages)
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-08(E), Section: A.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, San Diego, 2018.
Includes bibliographical references
A standard feature of the contemporary internet landscape is the ability for people to comment on published content and to interact with other individuals, discussing the issues at hand and engaging with each other in debate. In this thesis, I describe a method for the automatic detection of author stances in online forums with respect to discussions on divisive, polarizing social issues, such as gun control and marriage equality -- a task which is often unproblematic for human readers of the discourse. The research investigates the linguistic and rhetorical devices used by discussion participants to express their topic stance in the context of multi-party, multi-threaded discourse. Along the way, I address necessary sub-tasks in the author stance detection problem, such as the classification of the topic stance of an individual contribution to the discourse, and the assessment of the level of agreement or disagreement between adjacent posts -- which is crucial, given the highly interactive nature of this genre. I also identify features that provide evidence of an author's topic stance from the very structure of the discourse, without any information at all from the text of the comments posted. The final model is a collective classifier that is able to synthesize all of the stance indicators provided by these different sources, deal with the inconsistencies in this information that may arise, and arrive at a single prediction of the topic stance for every participant in the discussion. The model has many applications in industry and public life, including more tailored newsfeeds, social network suggestions, and use in political fundraising or advocacy campaigns.
Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018
Mode of access: World Wide Web
ISBN: 9780355811599Subjects--Topical Terms:
557829
Linguistics.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:
554714
Electronic books.
Identifying Author Topic Stance in Online Discussion Forums.
LDR
:02915ntm a2200337Ki 4500
001
918078
005
20181022132814.5
006
m o u
007
cr mn||||a|a||
008
190606s2018 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020
$a
9780355811599
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI10749995
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)ucsd:17243
035
$a
AAI10749995
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$b
eng
$c
MiAaPQ
$d
NTU
100
1
$a
Patterson, Gary.
$3
888104
245
1 0
$a
Identifying Author Topic Stance in Online Discussion Forums.
264
0
$c
2018
300
$a
1 online resource (173 pages)
336
$a
text
$b
txt
$2
rdacontent
337
$a
computer
$b
c
$2
rdamedia
338
$a
online resource
$b
cr
$2
rdacarrier
500
$a
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-08(E), Section: A.
500
$a
Adviser: Andrew Kehler.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, San Diego, 2018.
504
$a
Includes bibliographical references
520
$a
A standard feature of the contemporary internet landscape is the ability for people to comment on published content and to interact with other individuals, discussing the issues at hand and engaging with each other in debate. In this thesis, I describe a method for the automatic detection of author stances in online forums with respect to discussions on divisive, polarizing social issues, such as gun control and marriage equality -- a task which is often unproblematic for human readers of the discourse. The research investigates the linguistic and rhetorical devices used by discussion participants to express their topic stance in the context of multi-party, multi-threaded discourse. Along the way, I address necessary sub-tasks in the author stance detection problem, such as the classification of the topic stance of an individual contribution to the discourse, and the assessment of the level of agreement or disagreement between adjacent posts -- which is crucial, given the highly interactive nature of this genre. I also identify features that provide evidence of an author's topic stance from the very structure of the discourse, without any information at all from the text of the comments posted. The final model is a collective classifier that is able to synthesize all of the stance indicators provided by these different sources, deal with the inconsistencies in this information that may arise, and arrive at a single prediction of the topic stance for every participant in the discussion. The model has many applications in industry and public life, including more tailored newsfeeds, social network suggestions, and use in political fundraising or advocacy campaigns.
533
$a
Electronic reproduction.
$b
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
$c
ProQuest,
$d
2018
538
$a
Mode of access: World Wide Web
650
4
$a
Linguistics.
$3
557829
650
4
$a
Web studies.
$3
1148502
655
7
$a
Electronic books.
$2
local
$3
554714
690
$a
0290
690
$a
0646
710
2
$a
ProQuest Information and Learning Co.
$3
1178819
710
2
$a
University of California, San Diego.
$b
Linguistics.
$3
1184026
773
0
$t
Dissertation Abstracts International
$g
79-08A(E).
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10749995
$z
click for full text (PQDT)
based on 0 review(s)
Multimedia
Reviews
Add a review
and share your thoughts with other readers
Export
pickup library
Processing
...
Change password
Login