國立虎尾科技大學 |

Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review = Comparative Perspectives /

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review/ edited by Guobin Zhu.
其他題名:	Comparative Perspectives /
其他作者:	Zhu, Guobin.
面頁冊數:	XIII, 445 p.online resource. :
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
標題:	Private international law. -
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31539-9
ISBN:	9783030315399

Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review = Comparative Perspectives /
Deference to the Administration in Judicial ReviewComparative Perspectives /[electronic resource] :edited by Guobin Zhu. - 1st ed. 2019. - XIII, 445 p.online resource. - Ius Comparatum - Global Studies in Comparative Law,392214-6881 ;. - Ius Comparatum - Global Studies in Comparative Law,8.

Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review: Comparative Perspectives -- Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review in Argentina -- Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review in Australia -- Comparer la déférence judiciaire : regards canadiens vers l’extérieur -- Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review in China -- Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review in the Czech Republic -- Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review in Denmark -- Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review: The European Union -- Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review in Finland -- A Principled Approach to Judicial Deference for Hong Kong -- Judicial Deference to the Administration in Israel -- Judicial Review of Administrative Action in Italy: Beyond Deference? -- Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review in Japan -- Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review: The Case of the Netherlands -- The “Dreadful Truth” and Transparent Fictions: Deference in New Zealand Administrative Law -- Deference to the Public Administration in Judicial Review: A Polish Perspective‘The Notion of a Subjective or Unfettered Discretion is Contrary to the Rule of Law’: Judicial Review of Administrative Action in Singapore -- Full Judicial Review or Administrative Discretion? A Swedish Perspective on Deference to the Administration -- Judicial Deference to the Administration in the United States.

This book investigates judicial deference to the administration in judicial review, a concept and legal practice that can be found to a greater or lesser degree in every constitutional system. In each system, deference functions differently, because the positioning of the judiciary with regard to the separation of powers, the role of the courts as a mechanism of checks and balances, and the scope of judicial review differ. In addition, the way deference works within the constitutional system itself is complex, multi-faceted and often covert. Although judicial deference to the administration is a topical theme in comparative administrative law, a general examination of national systems is still lacking. As such, a theoretical and empirical review is called for. Accordingly, this book presents national reports from 15 jurisdictions, ranging from Argentina, Canada and the US, to the EU. Constituting the outcome of the 20th General Congress of the International Academy of Comparative Law, held in Fukuoka, Japan in July 2018, it offers a valuable and unique resource for the study of comparative administrative law.

ISBN: 9783030315399

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-030-31539-9doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

1202562
Private international law.

LC Class. No.: K7000-7720.22

Dewey Class. No.: 340.9

Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review = Comparative Perspectives /
LDR:04104nam a22004455i 4500 001 1004993
003 DE-He213
005 20200704162945.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 210106s2019 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020 $a 9783030315399 $9 978-3-030-31539-9
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-030-31539-9 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-030-31539-9
050 4 $a K7000-7720.22
050 4 $a K7073-7078
072 7 $a LB $2 bicssc
072 7 $a LAW051000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a LB $2 thema
072 7 $a LAM $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 340.9 $2 23
082 0 4 $a 340.2 $2 23
245 1 0 $a Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review $h [electronic resource] : $b Comparative Perspectives / $c edited by Guobin Zhu.
250 $a 1st ed. 2019.
264 1 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2019.
300 $a XIII, 445 p. $b online resource.
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
347 $a text file $b PDF $2 rda
490 1 $a Ius Comparatum - Global Studies in Comparative Law, $x 2214-6881 ; $v 39
505 0 $a Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review: Comparative Perspectives -- Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review in Argentina -- Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review in Australia -- Comparer la déférence judiciaire : regards canadiens vers l’extérieur -- Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review in China -- Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review in the Czech Republic -- Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review in Denmark -- Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review: The European Union -- Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review in Finland -- A Principled Approach to Judicial Deference for Hong Kong -- Judicial Deference to the Administration in Israel -- Judicial Review of Administrative Action in Italy: Beyond Deference? -- Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review in Japan -- Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review: The Case of the Netherlands -- The “Dreadful Truth” and Transparent Fictions: Deference in New Zealand Administrative Law -- Deference to the Public Administration in Judicial Review: A Polish Perspective‘The Notion of a Subjective or Unfettered Discretion is Contrary to the Rule of Law’: Judicial Review of Administrative Action in Singapore -- Full Judicial Review or Administrative Discretion? A Swedish Perspective on Deference to the Administration -- Judicial Deference to the Administration in the United States.
520 $a This book investigates judicial deference to the administration in judicial review, a concept and legal practice that can be found to a greater or lesser degree in every constitutional system. In each system, deference functions differently, because the positioning of the judiciary with regard to the separation of powers, the role of the courts as a mechanism of checks and balances, and the scope of judicial review differ. In addition, the way deference works within the constitutional system itself is complex, multi-faceted and often covert. Although judicial deference to the administration is a topical theme in comparative administrative law, a general examination of national systems is still lacking. As such, a theoretical and empirical review is called for. Accordingly, this book presents national reports from 15 jurisdictions, ranging from Argentina, Canada and the US, to the EU. Constituting the outcome of the 20th General Congress of the International Academy of Comparative Law, held in Fukuoka, Japan in July 2018, it offers a valuable and unique resource for the study of comparative administrative law.
650 0 $a Private international law. $3 1202562
650 0 $a Conflict of laws. $3 560163
650 0 $a Constitutional law. $3 564349
650 0 $a Administrative law. $3 566148
650 1 4 $a Private International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law . $3 1209897
650 2 4 $a Constitutional Law. $3 671565
650 2 4 $a Administrative Law. $3 670581
700 1 $a Zhu, Guobin. $e editor. $4 edt $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt $3 1298496
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 593884
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783030315382
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783030315405
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783030315412
830 0 $a Ius Comparatum - Global Studies in Comparative Law, $x 2214-6881 ; $v 8 $3 1257748
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31539-9
912 $a ZDB-2-LCR
912 $a ZDB-2-SXLC
950 $a Law and Criminology (SpringerNature-41177)
950 $a Law and Criminology (R0) (SpringerNature-43727)