國立虎尾科技大學 |

Science-Based Lawmaking = How to Effectively Integrate Science in International Environmental Law /

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Science-Based Lawmaking / by Dionysia-Theodora Avgerinopoulou.
其他題名:	How to Effectively Integrate Science in International Environmental Law /
作者:	Avgerinopoulou, Dionysia-Theodora.
面頁冊數:	XX, 419 p. 1 illus.online resource. :
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
標題:	International environmental law. -
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21417-3
ISBN:	9783030214173

Science-Based Lawmaking = How to Effectively Integrate Science in International Environmental Law /
Avgerinopoulou, Dionysia-Theodora.

Science-Based Lawmaking How to Effectively Integrate Science in International Environmental Law /[electronic resource] :by Dionysia-Theodora Avgerinopoulou. - 1st ed. 2019. - XX, 419 p. 1 illus.online resource.

Introduction: Is Contemporary International Environmental Law Based on Science? -- Historical Background: What Are the Lessons Learnt from the Past and What Remains To Be Answered -- Part I -- Pathology of International Environmental Law -- Fragmentation of Science, International Environmental Law, and International Institutions -- Causes of Pathology -- Part II -- Normative Powers of the International Institutions with Environmental Competence -- Contemporary Lawmaking Processes and Progressive Lawmaking Processes That Bind the States Without Unanimous Vote -- Progressive Lawmaking Procedures in the Framework of International Institutions with Environmental Competence -- Normative Powers of Expert Bodies as Variables for Effective Environmental Governance -- Additional Theoretical Legal Bases for the Integration of Science in International Environmental Law Without Any Constitutional or Procedural Amendment -- Part III -- Democratic Governance and Public Accountability as Limitations to the Science-Based Lawmaking Model -- The Inherent Limits of the Science-Based Lawmaking Model -- Criticism Against the Delegation of Lawmaking Powers to Experts Based Upon Democratic Considerations -- Part IV -- “To Unite the Political Power with the Wisdom. . .”: The Decision-Making Model That Accepts Expertise as a Basis of Legitimacy -- Why Would States Obey Rules Issued by Expert Bodies? -- Science Expertise as a Legitimacy Basis for Lawmaking and Additional Bases of Legitimacy -- A New Modus Operandi for the International Institutions with Environmental Competence -- Part V -- Towards a Comprehensive Science-Based Lawmaking Model -- Conclusion.

The Book takes the approach of a critique of the prevailing international environmental law-making processes and their systemic shortcomings. It aims to partly redesign the current international environmental law-making system in order to promote further legislation and more effectively protect the natural environment and public health. Through case studies and doctrinal analyses, an array of initial questions guides the reader through a variety of factors influencing the development of International Environmental Law. After a historical analysis, commencing from the Platonic philosophy up to present, the Book holds that some of the most decisive factors that could create an optimized law-making framework include, among others: progressive voting processes, science-based secondary international environmental legislation, new procedural rules, that enhance the participation in the law-making process by both experts and the public and also review the implementation, compliance and validity of the science-base of the laws. The international community should develop new law-making procedures that include expert opinion. Current scientific uncertainties can be resolved either by policy choices or by referring to the so-called „sound science.“ In formulating a new framework for environmental lawmaking processes, it is essential to re-shape the rules of procedure, so that experts have greater participation in those, in order to improve the quality of International Environmental Law faster than the traditional processes that mainly embrace political priorities generated by the States. Science serves as one of the main tools that will create the next generation of International Environmental Law and help the world transition to a smart, inclusive, sustainable future. .

ISBN: 9783030214173

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-030-21417-3doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

1009006
International environmental law.

LC Class. No.: K3581-3598.22

Dewey Class. No.: 344.046

Science-Based Lawmaking = How to Effectively Integrate Science in International Environmental Law /
LDR:04854nam a22003975i 4500 001 1006457
003 DE-He213
005 20200702200415.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 210106s2019 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020 $a 9783030214173 $9 978-3-030-21417-3
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-030-21417-3 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-030-21417-3
050 4 $a K3581-3598.22
072 7 $a LBBP $2 bicssc
072 7 $a LAW051000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a LBBP $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 344.046 $2 23
100 1 $a Avgerinopoulou, Dionysia-Theodora. $e author. $4 aut $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut $3 1300018
245 1 0 $a Science-Based Lawmaking $h [electronic resource] : $b How to Effectively Integrate Science in International Environmental Law / $c by Dionysia-Theodora Avgerinopoulou.
250 $a 1st ed. 2019.
264 1 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2019.
300 $a XX, 419 p. 1 illus. $b online resource.
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
347 $a text file $b PDF $2 rda
505 0 $a Introduction: Is Contemporary International Environmental Law Based on Science? -- Historical Background: What Are the Lessons Learnt from the Past and What Remains To Be Answered -- Part I -- Pathology of International Environmental Law -- Fragmentation of Science, International Environmental Law, and International Institutions -- Causes of Pathology -- Part II -- Normative Powers of the International Institutions with Environmental Competence -- Contemporary Lawmaking Processes and Progressive Lawmaking Processes That Bind the States Without Unanimous Vote -- Progressive Lawmaking Procedures in the Framework of International Institutions with Environmental Competence -- Normative Powers of Expert Bodies as Variables for Effective Environmental Governance -- Additional Theoretical Legal Bases for the Integration of Science in International Environmental Law Without Any Constitutional or Procedural Amendment -- Part III -- Democratic Governance and Public Accountability as Limitations to the Science-Based Lawmaking Model -- The Inherent Limits of the Science-Based Lawmaking Model -- Criticism Against the Delegation of Lawmaking Powers to Experts Based Upon Democratic Considerations -- Part IV -- “To Unite the Political Power with the Wisdom. . .”: The Decision-Making Model That Accepts Expertise as a Basis of Legitimacy -- Why Would States Obey Rules Issued by Expert Bodies? -- Science Expertise as a Legitimacy Basis for Lawmaking and Additional Bases of Legitimacy -- A New Modus Operandi for the International Institutions with Environmental Competence -- Part V -- Towards a Comprehensive Science-Based Lawmaking Model -- Conclusion.
520 $a The Book takes the approach of a critique of the prevailing international environmental law-making processes and their systemic shortcomings. It aims to partly redesign the current international environmental law-making system in order to promote further legislation and more effectively protect the natural environment and public health. Through case studies and doctrinal analyses, an array of initial questions guides the reader through a variety of factors influencing the development of International Environmental Law. After a historical analysis, commencing from the Platonic philosophy up to present, the Book holds that some of the most decisive factors that could create an optimized law-making framework include, among others: progressive voting processes, science-based secondary international environmental legislation, new procedural rules, that enhance the participation in the law-making process by both experts and the public and also review the implementation, compliance and validity of the science-base of the laws. The international community should develop new law-making procedures that include expert opinion. Current scientific uncertainties can be resolved either by policy choices or by referring to the so-called „sound science.“ In formulating a new framework for environmental lawmaking processes, it is essential to re-shape the rules of procedure, so that experts have greater participation in those, in order to improve the quality of International Environmental Law faster than the traditional processes that mainly embrace political priorities generated by the States. Science serves as one of the main tools that will create the next generation of International Environmental Law and help the world transition to a smart, inclusive, sustainable future. .
650 0 $a International environmental law. $2 bicssc $3 1009006
650 0 $a Environmental law. $3 567063
650 0 $a Environmental policy. $3 556516
650 0 $a Environmental sciences. $3 558921
650 0 $a International law. $3 557047
650 0 $a Environmental management. $3 557131
650 0 $a Political science. $3 558774
650 1 4 $a International Environmental Law. $3 883673
650 2 4 $a Environmental Law/Policy/Ecojustice. $3 677313
650 2 4 $a Environmental Science and Engineering. $3 882397
650 2 4 $a Sources and Subjects of International Law, International Organizations. $3 885568
650 2 4 $a Water Policy/Water Governance/Water Management. $3 1019644
650 2 4 $a Philosophy of Law. $3 671683
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 593884
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783030214166
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783030214180
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783030214197
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21417-3
912 $a ZDB-2-LCR
912 $a ZDB-2-SXLC
950 $a Law and Criminology (SpringerNature-41177)
950 $a Law and Criminology (R0) (SpringerNature-43727)