國立虎尾科技大學 |

Smarter Ballots = Electoral Realism and Reform /

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Smarter Ballots/ by J.S. Maloy.
其他題名:	Electoral Realism and Reform /
作者:	Maloy, J.S.
面頁冊數:	XX, 229 p. 48 illus.online resource. :
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
標題:	Elections. -
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13031-2
ISBN:	9783030130312

Smarter Ballots = Electoral Realism and Reform /
Maloy, J.S.

Smarter BallotsElectoral Realism and Reform /[electronic resource] :by J.S. Maloy. - 1st ed. 2019. - XX, 229 p. 48 illus.online resource. - Elections, Voting, Technology. - Elections, Voting, Technology.

1. Introduction: Electoral Dysfunction and Political Realism -- 2. What Research Reveals: Deficits of Electoral Accountability -- 3. What Research Overlooks: Voters’ Dilemma of Disempowerment -- 4. Lessons from Theory: The Blunted Blade of One-Mark Ballots -- 5. Lessons from Experience: The Cutting Edge of Ranking and Grading Ballots -- 6. America Re-Votes, 2016: Retrospective Simulations with Smarter Ballots -- 7. Conclusion: A Realist’s Agenda for Research and Reform.

This book presents a new democratic theory of election reform, using the tradition of political realism to interrogate and synthesize findings from global elections research and voting theory. In a world of democratic deficits and uncivil societies, political researchers and reformers should prioritize creating smarter ballots before smarter voters. Many democracies’ electoral systems impose a dilemma of disempowerment which traps voters between the twin dangers of vote-splitting and “lesser evil” choices, restricting individual expression while degrading systemic accountability. The application of innovative conceptual tools to comparative empirical analysis and previous experimental results reveals that ballot structure is crucial, but often overlooked, in sustaining this dilemma. Multi-mark ballot structures can resolve the dilemma of disempowerment by allowing voters to rank or grade multiple parties or candidates per contest, thereby furnishing democratic citizens with a broader array of options, finer tools of expression, and stronger powers of accountability. Innovative proposals for ranking and grading ballots in both multi-winner and single-winner contests, including referendums, are offered to provoke further experimentation and reform—a process that may help the cause of democratic elections’ relevance and survival.

ISBN: 9783030130312

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-030-13031-2doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

555219
Elections.

LC Class. No.: JF1001-1048.52

Dewey Class. No.: 324.6

Smarter Ballots = Electoral Realism and Reform /
LDR:03263nam a22004095i 4500 001 1010133
003 DE-He213
005 20200701225734.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 210106s2019 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020 $a 9783030130312 $9 978-3-030-13031-2
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-030-13031-2 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-030-13031-2
050 4 $a JF1001-1048.52
072 7 $a JPHF $2 bicssc
072 7 $a POL007000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a JPHF $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 324.6 $2 23
100 1 $a Maloy, J.S. $e author. $4 aut $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut $3 1304172
245 1 0 $a Smarter Ballots $h [electronic resource] : $b Electoral Realism and Reform / $c by J.S. Maloy.
250 $a 1st ed. 2019.
264 1 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan, $c 2019.
300 $a XX, 229 p. 48 illus. $b online resource.
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
347 $a text file $b PDF $2 rda
490 1 $a Elections, Voting, Technology
505 0 $a 1. Introduction: Electoral Dysfunction and Political Realism -- 2. What Research Reveals: Deficits of Electoral Accountability -- 3. What Research Overlooks: Voters’ Dilemma of Disempowerment -- 4. Lessons from Theory: The Blunted Blade of One-Mark Ballots -- 5. Lessons from Experience: The Cutting Edge of Ranking and Grading Ballots -- 6. America Re-Votes, 2016: Retrospective Simulations with Smarter Ballots -- 7. Conclusion: A Realist’s Agenda for Research and Reform.
520 $a This book presents a new democratic theory of election reform, using the tradition of political realism to interrogate and synthesize findings from global elections research and voting theory. In a world of democratic deficits and uncivil societies, political researchers and reformers should prioritize creating smarter ballots before smarter voters. Many democracies’ electoral systems impose a dilemma of disempowerment which traps voters between the twin dangers of vote-splitting and “lesser evil” choices, restricting individual expression while degrading systemic accountability. The application of innovative conceptual tools to comparative empirical analysis and previous experimental results reveals that ballot structure is crucial, but often overlooked, in sustaining this dilemma. Multi-mark ballot structures can resolve the dilemma of disempowerment by allowing voters to rank or grade multiple parties or candidates per contest, thereby furnishing democratic citizens with a broader array of options, finer tools of expression, and stronger powers of accountability. Innovative proposals for ranking and grading ballots in both multi-winner and single-winner contests, including referendums, are offered to provoke further experimentation and reform—a process that may help the cause of democratic elections’ relevance and survival.
650 0 $a Elections. $3 555219
650 0 $a Democracy. $3 557320
650 0 $a Political science. $3 558774
650 1 4 $a Electoral Politics. $3 1105083
650 2 4 $a Governance and Government. $3 1140620
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 593884
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783030130305
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783030130329
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783030130336
830 0 $a Elections, Voting, Technology $3 1259343
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13031-2
912 $a ZDB-2-POS
912 $a ZDB-2-SXPI
950 $a Political Science and International Studies (SpringerNature-41174)
950 $a Political Science and International Studies (R0) (SpringerNature-43724)