國立虎尾科技大學 |

Toward a New (Old) Theory of Responsibility: Moving beyond Accountability

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Toward a New (Old) Theory of Responsibility: Moving beyond Accountability/ by Daryl Koehn.
作者:	Koehn, Daryl.
面頁冊數:	VIII, 89 p. 1 illus.online resource. :
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
標題:	Business ethics. -
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16737-0
ISBN:	9783030167370

Toward a New (Old) Theory of Responsibility: Moving beyond Accountability
Koehn, Daryl.

Toward a New (Old) Theory of Responsibility: Moving beyond Accountability[electronic resource] /by Daryl Koehn. - 1st ed. 2019. - VIII, 89 p. 1 illus.online resource. - SpringerBriefs in Ethics,2211-8101. - SpringerBriefs in Ethics,.

Chapter 1. Why We Need a New (Old) Idea of Responsibility -- Chapter 2. Intentional Agency Responsibility in the Anglo-American Legal Tradition -- Chapter 3. Jonasian Ontological Responsibility -- Chapter 4. Arendtian Communicative Responsibility -- Chapter 5. Socratic Dialogical Responsibility -- Chapter 6. Conclusion.

This book offers a much needed overview of the neglected notion of responsibility. Instead of offering vague talk about “individual responsibility” or “corporate responsibility,” Daryl Koehn examines in detail four accounts of responsibility, taking care to specify what responsibility does and does not mean in each account. She argues for a return to the ancient concept of Socratic dialogical responsibility, a concept that avoids many of the problems inherent in the other accounts. After examining the Anglo-American criminal legal system’s treatment of responsibility as intentional agency, she critiques Hans Jonas’s concept of responsibility as ontological care and Hannah Arendt’s notion of communicative responsibility. She provides a careful analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of each approach to responsibility. The final chapter makes the case for Socratic dialogical responsibility. Dialogical responsibility has many strengths in its own right and avoids the major pitfalls of the other notions of responsibility examined in the book. It serves as an eminently practical way to hold ourselves responsible for our actions and speech. In addition, dialogical responsibility alone qualifies as a virtue integral to the good life. .

ISBN: 9783030167370

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-030-16737-0doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

555013
Business ethics.

LC Class. No.: HF5387-5387.5

Dewey Class. No.: 174.4

Toward a New (Old) Theory of Responsibility: Moving beyond Accountability
LDR:02944nam a22003975i 4500 001 1012926
003 DE-He213
005 20200703104853.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 210106s2019 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020 $a 9783030167370 $9 978-3-030-16737-0
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-030-16737-0 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-030-16737-0
050 4 $a HF5387-5387.5
072 7 $a KJG $2 bicssc
072 7 $a BUS008000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a KJG $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 174.4 $2 23
100 1 $a Koehn, Daryl. $4 aut $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut $3 1020350
245 1 0 $a Toward a New (Old) Theory of Responsibility: Moving beyond Accountability $h [electronic resource] / $c by Daryl Koehn.
250 $a 1st ed. 2019.
264 1 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2019.
300 $a VIII, 89 p. 1 illus. $b online resource.
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
347 $a text file $b PDF $2 rda
490 1 $a SpringerBriefs in Ethics, $x 2211-8101
505 0 $a Chapter 1. Why We Need a New (Old) Idea of Responsibility -- Chapter 2. Intentional Agency Responsibility in the Anglo-American Legal Tradition -- Chapter 3. Jonasian Ontological Responsibility -- Chapter 4. Arendtian Communicative Responsibility -- Chapter 5. Socratic Dialogical Responsibility -- Chapter 6. Conclusion.
520 $a This book offers a much needed overview of the neglected notion of responsibility. Instead of offering vague talk about “individual responsibility” or “corporate responsibility,” Daryl Koehn examines in detail four accounts of responsibility, taking care to specify what responsibility does and does not mean in each account. She argues for a return to the ancient concept of Socratic dialogical responsibility, a concept that avoids many of the problems inherent in the other accounts. After examining the Anglo-American criminal legal system’s treatment of responsibility as intentional agency, she critiques Hans Jonas’s concept of responsibility as ontological care and Hannah Arendt’s notion of communicative responsibility. She provides a careful analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of each approach to responsibility. The final chapter makes the case for Socratic dialogical responsibility. Dialogical responsibility has many strengths in its own right and avoids the major pitfalls of the other notions of responsibility examined in the book. It serves as an eminently practical way to hold ourselves responsible for our actions and speech. In addition, dialogical responsibility alone qualifies as a virtue integral to the good life. .
650 0 $a Business ethics. $3 555013
650 0 $a Ethics. $3 555769
650 0 $a Modern philosophy. $3 1253670
650 1 4 $a Business Ethics. $3 1069082
650 2 4 $a Moral Philosophy. $3 1106986
650 2 4 $a Modern Philosophy. $3 671570
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 593884
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783030167363
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783030167387
830 0 $a SpringerBriefs in Ethics, $x 2211-8101 $3 1257065
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16737-0
912 $a ZDB-2-REP
912 $a ZDB-2-SXPR
950 $a Religion and Philosophy (SpringerNature-41175)
950 $a Philosophy and Religion (R0) (SpringerNature-43725)