語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Playing the PhD Game with Integrity ...
~
Bowden, John A.
Playing the PhD Game with Integrity = Connecting Research, Professional Practice and Educational Context /
紀錄類型:
書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Playing the PhD Game with Integrity/ by John A Bowden, Pamela J Green.
其他題名:
Connecting Research, Professional Practice and Educational Context /
作者:
Bowden, John A.
其他作者:
Green, Pamela J.
面頁冊數:
XVII, 300 p. 13 illus., 2 illus. in color.online resource. :
Contained By:
Springer Nature eBook
標題:
Higher education. -
電子資源:
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6990-2
ISBN:
9789811369902
Playing the PhD Game with Integrity = Connecting Research, Professional Practice and Educational Context /
Bowden, John A.
Playing the PhD Game with Integrity
Connecting Research, Professional Practice and Educational Context /[electronic resource] :by John A Bowden, Pamela J Green. - 1st ed. 2019. - XVII, 300 p. 13 illus., 2 illus. in color.online resource. - Understanding Teaching-Learning Practice,2522-0845. - Understanding Teaching-Learning Practice,.
1 'Playing the PhD game' with integrity: An overview -- 2 The moral compass framework (MCE) for resolution of wicked problems in doctoral education -- 3 Moral development within the doctoral system -- 4 Connected moral capability: The missing link in doctoral education -- 5 Completion mindsets and contexts in doctoral education: Pursuing efficiency and quality with integrity -- 6 Integrity principles for the conduct of research -- 7 Decision-making with integrity in doctoral research practice -- 8 Writing with integrity -- 9 Creative team authorship: Sequential and cascading mutual catalysis -- 10 Establishing integrity in doctoral research training -- 11 Learning to use 'negotiated sense' on wicked problems beyond the PhD.
This book focuses on integrity throughout the PhD journey and beyond, and is organised around two main themes: (1) integrity in relation to the capabilities developed by doctoral candidates for professional practice; and (2) integrity and coherence at the PhD system level. The working methods of key participants such as PhD candidates, supervisors, university managers, government agencies and politicians are central to achieving integrity goals within PhD programmes. In this context, a number of constructs are developed that inform the practice-based elements of the book in relation to conducting doctoral research, research supervision, academic writing, and research training support systems; in particular, these include our Moral Compass Framework for professional integrity, notions of collective morality, decision-making when faced with ‘wicked’ problems, connected moral capability and our double-helix model of capability development, negotiated sense in contrast with common sense, completion mindsets and contexts, mindfulness, liminality, and mutual catalysis in joint authorship. While the data the book employs stems from practice-led research within the Australian doctoral system, the conclusions drawn are of global relevance. Throughout the book, wherever appropriate, comparisons are made between the Australian context and other contexts, such as the doctoral systems of the United Kingdom, Europe and the United States.
ISBN: 9789811369902
Standard No.: 10.1007/978-981-13-6990-2doiSubjects--Topical Terms:
1148448
Higher education.
LC Class. No.: LB2300-2799.3
Dewey Class. No.: 378
Playing the PhD Game with Integrity = Connecting Research, Professional Practice and Educational Context /
LDR
:03639nam a22004095i 4500
001
1013957
003
DE-He213
005
20200706074743.0
007
cr nn 008mamaa
008
210106s2019 si | s |||| 0|eng d
020
$a
9789811369902
$9
978-981-13-6990-2
024
7
$a
10.1007/978-981-13-6990-2
$2
doi
035
$a
978-981-13-6990-2
050
4
$a
LB2300-2799.3
072
7
$a
JNM
$2
bicssc
072
7
$a
EDU015000
$2
bisacsh
072
7
$a
JNM
$2
thema
082
0 4
$a
378
$2
23
100
1
$a
Bowden, John A.
$4
aut
$4
http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
$3
1228264
245
1 0
$a
Playing the PhD Game with Integrity
$h
[electronic resource] :
$b
Connecting Research, Professional Practice and Educational Context /
$c
by John A Bowden, Pamela J Green.
250
$a
1st ed. 2019.
264
1
$a
Singapore :
$b
Springer Singapore :
$b
Imprint: Springer,
$c
2019.
300
$a
XVII, 300 p. 13 illus., 2 illus. in color.
$b
online resource.
336
$a
text
$b
txt
$2
rdacontent
337
$a
computer
$b
c
$2
rdamedia
338
$a
online resource
$b
cr
$2
rdacarrier
347
$a
text file
$b
PDF
$2
rda
490
1
$a
Understanding Teaching-Learning Practice,
$x
2522-0845
505
0
$a
1 'Playing the PhD game' with integrity: An overview -- 2 The moral compass framework (MCE) for resolution of wicked problems in doctoral education -- 3 Moral development within the doctoral system -- 4 Connected moral capability: The missing link in doctoral education -- 5 Completion mindsets and contexts in doctoral education: Pursuing efficiency and quality with integrity -- 6 Integrity principles for the conduct of research -- 7 Decision-making with integrity in doctoral research practice -- 8 Writing with integrity -- 9 Creative team authorship: Sequential and cascading mutual catalysis -- 10 Establishing integrity in doctoral research training -- 11 Learning to use 'negotiated sense' on wicked problems beyond the PhD.
520
$a
This book focuses on integrity throughout the PhD journey and beyond, and is organised around two main themes: (1) integrity in relation to the capabilities developed by doctoral candidates for professional practice; and (2) integrity and coherence at the PhD system level. The working methods of key participants such as PhD candidates, supervisors, university managers, government agencies and politicians are central to achieving integrity goals within PhD programmes. In this context, a number of constructs are developed that inform the practice-based elements of the book in relation to conducting doctoral research, research supervision, academic writing, and research training support systems; in particular, these include our Moral Compass Framework for professional integrity, notions of collective morality, decision-making when faced with ‘wicked’ problems, connected moral capability and our double-helix model of capability development, negotiated sense in contrast with common sense, completion mindsets and contexts, mindfulness, liminality, and mutual catalysis in joint authorship. While the data the book employs stems from practice-led research within the Australian doctoral system, the conclusions drawn are of global relevance. Throughout the book, wherever appropriate, comparisons are made between the Australian context and other contexts, such as the doctoral systems of the United Kingdom, Europe and the United States.
650
0
$a
Higher education.
$3
1148448
650
0
$a
Learning.
$3
555256
650
0
$a
Instruction.
$3
1253701
650
0
$a
Educational policy.
$3
1200004
650
0
$a
Education and state.
$3
563302
650
1 4
$a
Higher Education.
$3
679030
650
2 4
$a
Learning & Instruction.
$3
670152
650
2 4
$a
Educational Policy and Politics.
$3
683657
700
1
$a
Green, Pamela J.
$4
aut
$4
http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
$3
1228265
710
2
$a
SpringerLink (Online service)
$3
593884
773
0
$t
Springer Nature eBook
776
0 8
$i
Printed edition:
$z
9789811369896
776
0 8
$i
Printed edition:
$z
9789811369919
776
0 8
$i
Printed edition:
$z
9789811369926
830
0
$a
Understanding Teaching-Learning Practice,
$x
2522-0845
$3
1287435
856
4 0
$u
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6990-2
912
$a
ZDB-2-EDA
912
$a
ZDB-2-SXED
950
$a
Education (SpringerNature-41171)
950
$a
Education (R0) (SpringerNature-43721)
筆 0 讀者評論
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館別
處理中
...
變更密碼[密碼必須為2種組合(英文和數字)及長度為10碼以上]
登入