國立虎尾科技大學 |

Rorty, Liberal Democracy, and Religious Certainty

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Rorty, Liberal Democracy, and Religious Certainty/ by Neil Gascoigne.
作者:	Gascoigne, Neil.
面頁冊數:	XIII, 115 p. 1 illus.online resource. :
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
標題:	Epistemology. -
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25454-4
ISBN:	9783030254544

Rorty, Liberal Democracy, and Religious Certainty
Gascoigne, Neil.

Rorty, Liberal Democracy, and Religious Certainty[electronic resource] /by Neil Gascoigne. - 1st ed. 2019. - XIII, 115 p. 1 illus.online resource.

Chapter 1: Pragmatist Fideism as Cultural Poltiics -- Chapter 2: Rorty, Religion and the Public Square -- Chapter 3: Presumptions of Innocence -- Chapter 4: Living Certainties -- Chapter 5: Pragmatist Fideism and Epistemological Peace.

This book asks whether there any limits to the sorts of religious considerations that can be raised in public debates, and if there are, by whom they are to be identified. Its starting point is the work of Richard Rorty, whose pragmatic pluralism leads him to argue for a politically motivated anticlericalism rather than an epistemologically driven atheism. Rather than defend Rorty’s position directly, Gascoigne argues for an epistemological stance he calls ‘Pragmatist Fideism’. The starting point for this exercise in what Rorty calls ‘Cultural Politics’ is an acknowledgement that one must appeal to both secularists and those with religious commitments. In recent years ‘reformed’ epistemologists have aimed to establish a parity of epistemic esteem between religious and perceptual beliefs by exploiting an analogy in respect of their mutual vulnerability to sceptical challenges. Through an examination of this analogy, and in light of Wittgenstein’s On Certainty, this book argues that understood correctly the ‘parity’ argument in fact lends epistemological support to the argument that religious considerations should not be raised in public debate. The political price paid—paying the price of politics—is worth it: the religious thinker is provided with a good reason for maintaining that their practices and beliefs are not undermined by other forms of religious life.

ISBN: 9783030254544

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-030-25454-4doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

671538
Epistemology.

LC Class. No.: BD143-237

Dewey Class. No.: 120

Rorty, Liberal Democracy, and Religious Certainty
LDR:02977nam a22003975i 4500 001 1015185
003 DE-He213
005 20200630024933.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 210106s2019 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020 $a 9783030254544 $9 978-3-030-25454-4
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-030-25454-4 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-030-25454-4
050 4 $a BD143-237
072 7 $a HPK $2 bicssc
072 7 $a PHI004000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a QDTK $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 120 $2 23
100 1 $a Gascoigne, Neil. $4 aut $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut $3 1229829
245 1 0 $a Rorty, Liberal Democracy, and Religious Certainty $h [electronic resource] / $c by Neil Gascoigne.
250 $a 1st ed. 2019.
264 1 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Palgrave Pivot, $c 2019.
300 $a XIII, 115 p. 1 illus. $b online resource.
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
347 $a text file $b PDF $2 rda
505 0 $a Chapter 1: Pragmatist Fideism as Cultural Poltiics -- Chapter 2: Rorty, Religion and the Public Square -- Chapter 3: Presumptions of Innocence -- Chapter 4: Living Certainties -- Chapter 5: Pragmatist Fideism and Epistemological Peace.
520 $a This book asks whether there any limits to the sorts of religious considerations that can be raised in public debates, and if there are, by whom they are to be identified. Its starting point is the work of Richard Rorty, whose pragmatic pluralism leads him to argue for a politically motivated anticlericalism rather than an epistemologically driven atheism. Rather than defend Rorty’s position directly, Gascoigne argues for an epistemological stance he calls ‘Pragmatist Fideism’. The starting point for this exercise in what Rorty calls ‘Cultural Politics’ is an acknowledgement that one must appeal to both secularists and those with religious commitments. In recent years ‘reformed’ epistemologists have aimed to establish a parity of epistemic esteem between religious and perceptual beliefs by exploiting an analogy in respect of their mutual vulnerability to sceptical challenges. Through an examination of this analogy, and in light of Wittgenstein’s On Certainty, this book argues that understood correctly the ‘parity’ argument in fact lends epistemological support to the argument that religious considerations should not be raised in public debate. The political price paid—paying the price of politics—is worth it: the religious thinker is provided with a good reason for maintaining that their practices and beliefs are not undermined by other forms of religious life.
650 0 $a Epistemology. $3 671538
650 0 $a Political philosophy. $3 1253605
650 0 $a Religion—Philosophy. $3 1253708
650 2 4 $a Political Philosophy. $3 671691
650 2 4 $a Philosophy of Religion. $3 671576
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 593884
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783030254537
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783030254551
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783030254568
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25454-4
912 $a ZDB-2-REP
912 $a ZDB-2-SXPR
950 $a Religion and Philosophy (SpringerNature-41175)
950 $a Philosophy and Religion (R0) (SpringerNature-43725)