國立虎尾科技大學 |

Voting Procedures Under a Restricted Domain = An Examination of the (In)Vulnerability of 20 Voting Procedures to Five Main Paradoxes /

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Voting Procedures Under a Restricted Domain/ by Dan S. Felsenthal, Hannu Nurmi.
Reminder of title:	An Examination of the (In)Vulnerability of 20 Voting Procedures to Five Main Paradoxes /
Author:	Felsenthal, Dan S.
other author:	Nurmi, Hannu.
Description:	X, 92 p.online resource. :
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
Subject:	Welfare economics. -
Online resource:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12627-8
ISBN:	9783030126278

Voting Procedures Under a Restricted Domain = An Examination of the (In)Vulnerability of 20 Voting Procedures to Five Main Paradoxes /
Felsenthal, Dan S.

Voting Procedures Under a Restricted DomainAn Examination of the (In)Vulnerability of 20 Voting Procedures to Five Main Paradoxes /[electronic resource] :by Dan S. Felsenthal, Hannu Nurmi. - 1st ed. 2019. - X, 92 p.online resource. - SpringerBriefs in Economics,2191-5504. - SpringerBriefs in Economics,.

Introduction -- 20 Voting Procedures Designed to Elect a Single Candidate -- The (In)Vulnerability of 20 Voting Procedures to Lack of Monotonicity in a Restricted Domain -- The (In)Vulnerability of 20 Voting Procedures to the Inconsistency Paradox (aka Reinforcement Paradox) in a Restricted Domain -- The (In)Vulnerability of 20 Voting Procedures to the No-Show Paradox in a Restricted Domain -- Which of the 20 Voting Procedures Satisfy or Violate the Subset Choice Condition (SCC) in a Restricted Domain? -- The (In)Vulnerability of 20 Voting Procedures to the Preference Inversion Paradox in a Restricted Domain -- Summary.

This book deals with 20 voting procedures used or proposed for use in elections resulting in the choice of a single winner. These procedures are evaluated in terms of their ability to avoid five important paradoxes in a restricted domain, viz., when a Condorcet winner exists and is elected in the initial profile. Together with the two companion volumes by the same authors, published by Springer in 2017 and 2018, this book aims at giving a comprehensive overview of the most important advantages and disadvantages of voting procedures thereby assisting decision makers in the choice of a voting procedure that would best suit their purposes.

ISBN: 9783030126278

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-030-12627-8doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

555259
Welfare economics.

LC Class. No.: HB846-846.8

Dewey Class. No.: 302.1

Voting Procedures Under a Restricted Domain = An Examination of the (In)Vulnerability of 20 Voting Procedures to Five Main Paradoxes /
LDR:02694nam a22003975i 4500 001 1015758
003 DE-He213
005 20200704043948.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 210106s2019 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020 $a 9783030126278 $9 978-3-030-12627-8
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-030-12627-8 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-030-12627-8
050 4 $a HB846-846.8
072 7 $a KCA $2 bicssc
072 7 $a BUS069030 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a KCA $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 302.1 $2 23
100 1 $a Felsenthal, Dan S. $4 aut $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut $3 889617
245 1 0 $a Voting Procedures Under a Restricted Domain $h [electronic resource] : $b An Examination of the (In)Vulnerability of 20 Voting Procedures to Five Main Paradoxes / $c by Dan S. Felsenthal, Hannu Nurmi.
250 $a 1st ed. 2019.
264 1 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2019.
300 $a X, 92 p. $b online resource.
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
347 $a text file $b PDF $2 rda
490 1 $a SpringerBriefs in Economics, $x 2191-5504
505 0 $a Introduction -- 20 Voting Procedures Designed to Elect a Single Candidate -- The (In)Vulnerability of 20 Voting Procedures to Lack of Monotonicity in a Restricted Domain -- The (In)Vulnerability of 20 Voting Procedures to the Inconsistency Paradox (aka Reinforcement Paradox) in a Restricted Domain -- The (In)Vulnerability of 20 Voting Procedures to the No-Show Paradox in a Restricted Domain -- Which of the 20 Voting Procedures Satisfy or Violate the Subset Choice Condition (SCC) in a Restricted Domain? -- The (In)Vulnerability of 20 Voting Procedures to the Preference Inversion Paradox in a Restricted Domain -- Summary.
520 $a This book deals with 20 voting procedures used or proposed for use in elections resulting in the choice of a single winner. These procedures are evaluated in terms of their ability to avoid five important paradoxes in a restricted domain, viz., when a Condorcet winner exists and is elected in the initial profile. Together with the two companion volumes by the same authors, published by Springer in 2017 and 2018, this book aims at giving a comprehensive overview of the most important advantages and disadvantages of voting procedures thereby assisting decision makers in the choice of a voting procedure that would best suit their purposes.
650 0 $a Welfare economics. $3 555259
650 0 $a Elections. $3 555219
650 0 $a Political philosophy. $3 1253605
650 0 $a Economic theory. $3 809881
650 0 $a Democracy. $3 557320
650 1 4 $a Social Choice/Welfare Economics/Public Choice/Political Economy. $3 1209828
650 2 4 $a Electoral Politics. $3 1105083
650 2 4 $a Political Philosophy. $3 671691
650 2 4 $a Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods. $3 1069071
700 1 $a Nurmi, Hannu. $4 aut $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut $3 1075099
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 593884
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783030126261
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783030126285
830 0 $a SpringerBriefs in Economics, $x 2191-5504 $3 1256355
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12627-8
912 $a ZDB-2-ECF
912 $a ZDB-2-SXEF
950 $a Economics and Finance (SpringerNature-41170)
950 $a Economics and Finance (R0) (SpringerNature-43720)