國立虎尾科技大學 |

Free Exercise of Religion in the Liberal Polity = Conflicting Interpretations /

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Free Exercise of Religion in the Liberal Polity/ by Emily R. Gill.
其他題名:	Conflicting Interpretations /
作者:	Gill, Emily R.
面頁冊數:	XV, 296 p. 1 illus.online resource. :
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
標題:	Religion and sociology. -
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25037-9
ISBN:	9783030250379

Free Exercise of Religion in the Liberal Polity = Conflicting Interpretations /
Gill, Emily R.

Free Exercise of Religion in the Liberal PolityConflicting Interpretations /[electronic resource] :by Emily R. Gill. - 1st ed. 2019. - XV, 296 p. 1 illus.online resource. - Palgrave Studies in Religion, Politics, and Policy. - Palgrave Studies in Religion, Politics, and Policy.

1. Introduction -- 2. Varieties of Neutrality -- 3. Free Exercise of Religion and Public Funds -- 4. Private Voluntary Organizations -- 5. Exemption Issues in Religious Belief and Practice -- 6. Marriage and Intimate Relationships -- 7. Conclusion. .

This book addresses the challenge of providing for the free exercise of religion without allowing religious exercise by some individuals and groups to impinge upon the conscientious convictions of others. State neutrality toward religion is impossible, because neutrality means inattention to religion for some, but leveling the playing field through accommodations or exemptions for others. Both formal and substantive neutrality have a place in addressing particular conflicts. One such example is public funding for religiously affiliated social service programs, for which neither type of neutrality is satisfactory and thus some restrictions are justifiable; conversely, private voluntary organizations that do not receive direct public funding should be allowed wide latitude regarding their practices. This title also examines the expansive free exercise claims that are now made by those who argue that following the law impinges upon their beliefs, as exemplified by the ministerial exception and the Hobby Lobby and Masterpiece Cakeshop Supreme Court cases. It concludes by analyzing the relationship between neutrality and marriage as a civil status, which impacts a variety of commitment types and plural marriage.

ISBN: 9783030250379

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-030-25037-9doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

578047
Religion and sociology.

LC Class. No.: BL60

Dewey Class. No.: 201.7

Free Exercise of Religion in the Liberal Polity = Conflicting Interpretations /
LDR:02906nam a22004095i 4500 001 1015983
003 DE-He213
005 20200705042105.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 210106s2019 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020 $a 9783030250379 $9 978-3-030-25037-9
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-030-25037-9 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-030-25037-9
050 4 $a BL60
072 7 $a HRAM $2 bicssc
072 7 $a SOC039000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a QRAM $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 201.7 $2 23
100 1 $a Gill, Emily R. $e author. $4 aut $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut $3 1310263
245 1 0 $a Free Exercise of Religion in the Liberal Polity $h [electronic resource] : $b Conflicting Interpretations / $c by Emily R. Gill.
250 $a 1st ed. 2019.
264 1 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan, $c 2019.
300 $a XV, 296 p. 1 illus. $b online resource.
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
347 $a text file $b PDF $2 rda
490 1 $a Palgrave Studies in Religion, Politics, and Policy
505 0 $a 1. Introduction -- 2. Varieties of Neutrality -- 3. Free Exercise of Religion and Public Funds -- 4. Private Voluntary Organizations -- 5. Exemption Issues in Religious Belief and Practice -- 6. Marriage and Intimate Relationships -- 7. Conclusion. .
520 $a This book addresses the challenge of providing for the free exercise of religion without allowing religious exercise by some individuals and groups to impinge upon the conscientious convictions of others. State neutrality toward religion is impossible, because neutrality means inattention to religion for some, but leveling the playing field through accommodations or exemptions for others. Both formal and substantive neutrality have a place in addressing particular conflicts. One such example is public funding for religiously affiliated social service programs, for which neither type of neutrality is satisfactory and thus some restrictions are justifiable; conversely, private voluntary organizations that do not receive direct public funding should be allowed wide latitude regarding their practices. This title also examines the expansive free exercise claims that are now made by those who argue that following the law impinges upon their beliefs, as exemplified by the ministerial exception and the Hobby Lobby and Masterpiece Cakeshop Supreme Court cases. It concludes by analyzing the relationship between neutrality and marriage as a civil status, which impacts a variety of commitment types and plural marriage.
650 0 $a Religion and sociology. $3 578047
650 0 $a Religion and politics. $3 558124
650 0 $a United States—Politics and government. $3 1253934
650 0 $a Political theory. $3 1253540
650 1 4 $a Religion and Society. $3 1105155
650 2 4 $a Politics and Religion. $3 1140702
650 2 4 $a US Politics. $3 1105233
650 2 4 $a Political Theory. $3 890169
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 593884
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783030250362
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783030250386
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783030250393
830 0 $a Palgrave Studies in Religion, Politics, and Policy $3 1260173
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25037-9
912 $a ZDB-2-REP
912 $a ZDB-2-SXPR
950 $a Religion and Philosophy (SpringerNature-41175)
950 $a Philosophy and Religion (R0) (SpringerNature-43725)