國立虎尾科技大學 |

Democratic Acceptance of Spatial Planning Policy Measures

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Democratic Acceptance of Spatial Planning Policy Measures/ by Lyn Ellen Pleger.
Author:	Pleger, Lyn Ellen.
Description:	XVI, 205 p. 29 illus.online resource. :
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
Subject:	Regional planning. -
Online resource:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90878-6
ISBN:	9783319908786

Democratic Acceptance of Spatial Planning Policy Measures
Pleger, Lyn Ellen.

Democratic Acceptance of Spatial Planning Policy Measures[electronic resource] /by Lyn Ellen Pleger. - 1st ed. 2019. - XVI, 205 p. 29 illus.online resource.

Introduction -- Sustainable Spatial Planning in Democracies -- Democratic Acceptance of Spatial Planning Policies -- Determinants of Democratic Acceptance: A Two-Level Analysis -- The Motivation behind Democratic Acceptance: A Case Study -- Framing Effects on Democratic Acceptability: An Experimental Approach -- Discussion.-Conclusions.

This book examines the democratic acceptance of spatial planning measures, using Switzerland as a case study. The currently inefficient land use in industrialised countries calls for new spatial planning policies. Yet governments have largely failed to implement innovative policy measures, which may be due to a lack of democratic acceptance. To date, little is known about the democratic acceptance of spatial planning measures. Switzerland offers a promising candidate because of its direct-democratic system, which allows citizens’ preferences for specific policy measures to be directly measured. In this work, the democratic acceptance of spatial planning instruments is investigated from various perspectives in the form of original empirical studies, which are embedded in an innovative conceptual framework. It demonstrates that not only spatial planning instruments in general, but also incentive-based instruments in particular, generally enjoy high acceptance. This finding is remarkable, considering the fact that efficient land use instruments have only been marginally implemented. Addressing the needs of both academics and land use practitioners in the private and public sector, the book shows that in order to improve the democratic acceptance of spatial planning measures, attention must be paid to their context, content and the means by which that content is provided.

ISBN: 9783319908786

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-319-90878-6doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

561956
Regional planning.

LC Class. No.: HT390-395

Dewey Class. No.: 710

Democratic Acceptance of Spatial Planning Policy Measures
LDR:03112nam a22004095i 4500 001 1016376
003 DE-He213
005 20200702092039.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 210106s2019 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020 $a 9783319908786 $9 978-3-319-90878-6
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-319-90878-6 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-319-90878-6
050 4 $a HT390-395
050 4 $a HT165.5-169.9
072 7 $a RP $2 bicssc
072 7 $a POL002000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a RP $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 710 $2 23
100 1 $a Pleger, Lyn Ellen. $e author. $4 aut $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut $3 1310776
245 1 0 $a Democratic Acceptance of Spatial Planning Policy Measures $h [electronic resource] / $c by Lyn Ellen Pleger.
250 $a 1st ed. 2019.
264 1 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2019.
300 $a XVI, 205 p. 29 illus. $b online resource.
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
347 $a text file $b PDF $2 rda
505 0 $a Introduction -- Sustainable Spatial Planning in Democracies -- Democratic Acceptance of Spatial Planning Policies -- Determinants of Democratic Acceptance: A Two-Level Analysis -- The Motivation behind Democratic Acceptance: A Case Study -- Framing Effects on Democratic Acceptability: An Experimental Approach -- Discussion.-Conclusions.
520 $a This book examines the democratic acceptance of spatial planning measures, using Switzerland as a case study. The currently inefficient land use in industrialised countries calls for new spatial planning policies. Yet governments have largely failed to implement innovative policy measures, which may be due to a lack of democratic acceptance. To date, little is known about the democratic acceptance of spatial planning measures. Switzerland offers a promising candidate because of its direct-democratic system, which allows citizens’ preferences for specific policy measures to be directly measured. In this work, the democratic acceptance of spatial planning instruments is investigated from various perspectives in the form of original empirical studies, which are embedded in an innovative conceptual framework. It demonstrates that not only spatial planning instruments in general, but also incentive-based instruments in particular, generally enjoy high acceptance. This finding is remarkable, considering the fact that efficient land use instruments have only been marginally implemented. Addressing the needs of both academics and land use practitioners in the private and public sector, the book shows that in order to improve the democratic acceptance of spatial planning measures, attention must be paid to their context, content and the means by which that content is provided.
650 0 $a Regional planning. $3 561956
650 0 $a Urban planning. $3 1180826
650 0 $a Political science. $3 558774
650 0 $a Environmental policy. $3 556516
650 1 4 $a Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning. $3 668548
650 2 4 $a Political Science. $3 668850
650 2 4 $a Environmental Politics. $3 1105266
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 593884
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783319908779
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783319908793
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783030081218
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90878-6
912 $a ZDB-2-EES
912 $a ZDB-2-SXEE
950 $a Earth and Environmental Science (SpringerNature-11646)
950 $a Earth and Environmental Science (R0) (SpringerNature-43711)