國立虎尾科技大學 |

Realism and Psychological Science

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Realism and Psychological Science/ by David J. F. Maree.
作者:	Maree, David J. F.
面頁冊數:	VIII, 151 p. 3 illus.online resource. :
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
標題:	Methodology of the Social Sciences. -
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45143-1
ISBN:	9783030451431

Realism and Psychological Science
Maree, David J. F.

Realism and Psychological Science[electronic resource] /by David J. F. Maree. - 1st ed. 2020. - VIII, 151 p. 3 illus.online resource.

1.Introduction -- 2.The Methodological Division: Quantitative and Qualitative Methods -- 3.The Applicative Split: The Science-Practitioner Model of Training and Practice -- 4.The Metatheoretical Opposition: Positivism and Constructionism -- 5.Realism in Psychological Science -- 6.The Realist Image of Science.

The book provides an argument why realism is a viable metatheoretical framework for psychological science. By looking at some variations of realism such as scientific realism, critical realism, situational realism and Ferraris’ new realism, a realist view of science is outlined that can feature as a metatheory for psychological science. Realism is a necessary correction for the mythical image of science responsible for and maintained by a number of dichotomies and polarities in psychology. Thus, the quantitative-qualitative dichotomy, scientist-practitioner polarity and positivist-constructionist opposition feed off and maintains a mythic image of science on levels of practice, methods and metatheory. Realism makes a clear distinction between ontology and epistemic access to reality, the latter which easily fits with softer versions of constructionism, and the former which grounds science in resistance and possibility, loosely translated as criticism. By taking science as a critical activity an issue such as the quantitative imperative looses its defining force as a hallmark of science - it provides epistemic access to certain parts of reality. In addition, essentially critical activities characteristic of various qualitative approaches may be welcomed as proper science. Academics, professionals and researchers in psychology would find value in situating their scholarly work in a realist metatheory avoiding the pitfalls of traditional methodologies and theories.

ISBN: 9783030451431

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-030-45143-1doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

669263
Methodology of the Social Sciences.

LC Class. No.: BF81-107.L4

Dewey Class. No.: 150.9

Realism and Psychological Science
LDR:03137nam a22003975i 4500 001 1017452
003 DE-He213
005 20200630111505.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 210318s2020 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020 $a 9783030451431 $9 978-3-030-45143-1
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-030-45143-1 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-030-45143-1
050 4 $a BF81-107.L4
072 7 $a PDX $2 bicssc
072 7 $a PSY015000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a PDX $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 150.9 $2 23
100 1 $a Maree, David J. F. $e author. $4 aut $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut $3 1312274
245 1 0 $a Realism and Psychological Science $h [electronic resource] / $c by David J. F. Maree.
250 $a 1st ed. 2020.
264 1 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2020.
300 $a VIII, 151 p. 3 illus. $b online resource.
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
347 $a text file $b PDF $2 rda
505 0 $a 1.Introduction -- 2.The Methodological Division: Quantitative and Qualitative Methods -- 3.The Applicative Split: The Science-Practitioner Model of Training and Practice -- 4.The Metatheoretical Opposition: Positivism and Constructionism -- 5.Realism in Psychological Science -- 6.The Realist Image of Science.
520 $a The book provides an argument why realism is a viable metatheoretical framework for psychological science. By looking at some variations of realism such as scientific realism, critical realism, situational realism and Ferraris’ new realism, a realist view of science is outlined that can feature as a metatheory for psychological science. Realism is a necessary correction for the mythical image of science responsible for and maintained by a number of dichotomies and polarities in psychology. Thus, the quantitative-qualitative dichotomy, scientist-practitioner polarity and positivist-constructionist opposition feed off and maintains a mythic image of science on levels of practice, methods and metatheory. Realism makes a clear distinction between ontology and epistemic access to reality, the latter which easily fits with softer versions of constructionism, and the former which grounds science in resistance and possibility, loosely translated as criticism. By taking science as a critical activity an issue such as the quantitative imperative looses its defining force as a hallmark of science - it provides epistemic access to certain parts of reality. In addition, essentially critical activities characteristic of various qualitative approaches may be welcomed as proper science. Academics, professionals and researchers in psychology would find value in situating their scholarly work in a realist metatheory avoiding the pitfalls of traditional methodologies and theories.
650 2 4 $a Methodology of the Social Sciences. $3 669263
650 2 4 $a Philosophy of Mind. $3 668203
650 2 4 $a Research Methodology. $3 1106280
650 1 4 $a History of Psychology. $3 668201
650 0 $a Social sciences. $3 572679
650 0 $a Philosophy of mind. $3 555804
650 0 $a Sociology—Research. $3 1266698
650 0 $a Psychology. $3 555998
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 593884
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783030451424
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783030451448
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783030451455
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45143-1
912 $a ZDB-2-BSP
912 $a ZDB-2-SXBP
950 $a Behavioral Science and Psychology (SpringerNature-41168)
950 $a Behavioral Science and Psychology (R0) (SpringerNature-43718)