國立虎尾科技大學 |

Market Design Powers of the European Commission? = Remedies under Articles 7 and 9 Regulation 1/03 /

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Market Design Powers of the European Commission?/ by Korbinian Reiter.
其他題名:	Remedies under Articles 7 and 9 Regulation 1/03 /
作者:	Reiter, Korbinian.
面頁冊數:	XVII, 563 p. 2 illus.online resource. :
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
標題:	European Union Politics. -
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-60711-4
ISBN:	9783662607114

Market Design Powers of the European Commission? = Remedies under Articles 7 and 9 Regulation 1/03 /
Reiter, Korbinian.

Market Design Powers of the European Commission?Remedies under Articles 7 and 9 Regulation 1/03 /[electronic resource] :by Korbinian Reiter. - 1st ed. 2020. - XVII, 563 p. 2 illus.online resource. - Munich Studies on Innovation and Competition,132199-7462 ;. - Munich Studies on Innovation and Competition,3.

Introduction -- Prolegomena -- The relaxation of the link between harm and remedy -- The relaxation of procedural safeguards -- The impact of commitments on legal certainty -- Outlook: Discussions of reform proposals -- Summary of key findings.

This book provides a comprehensive analysis of the remedies practice the European Commission has adopted on the basis of articles 7 and 9 of regulation 1/03. Using article 7 as a normative benchmark, it shows that most of the criticism levelled at the Commission's article 9 decisions and the Alrosa judgment of the CJEU is not justified, since critics tend to over-state both the rigour of article 7 and the laxness of article 9. Remaining inconsistencies between the commitment practice and the standards for infringement decisions can, it is submitted, be justified by the consensual nature of commitment decisions and their underlying goal of procedural economy. Moreover, it is suggested that too little importance is generally assigned to the beneficial effect which commitments bring about by providing for precise and enforceable obligations without sacrificing the concerned undertakings’ freedom to choose how to put the infringement to an end. Adopting a case-oriented approach, this study provides valuable insights for academics and practitioners alike.

ISBN: 9783662607114

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-662-60711-4doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

1104958
European Union Politics.

LC Class. No.: KJE2041-2635

Dewey Class. No.: 343.407

Market Design Powers of the European Commission? = Remedies under Articles 7 and 9 Regulation 1/03 /
LDR:02779nam a22004095i 4500 001 1022358
003 DE-He213
005 20200705064627.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 210318s2020 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020 $a 9783662607114 $9 978-3-662-60711-4
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-662-60711-4 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-662-60711-4
050 4 $a KJE2041-2635
072 7 $a LBBM $2 bicssc
072 7 $a LAW051000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a LBBM $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 343.407 $2 23
100 1 $a Reiter, Korbinian. $e author. $4 aut $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut $3 1318092
245 1 0 $a Market Design Powers of the European Commission? $h [electronic resource] : $b Remedies under Articles 7 and 9 Regulation 1/03 / $c by Korbinian Reiter.
250 $a 1st ed. 2020.
264 1 $a Berlin, Heidelberg : $b Springer Berlin Heidelberg : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2020.
300 $a XVII, 563 p. 2 illus. $b online resource.
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
347 $a text file $b PDF $2 rda
490 1 $a Munich Studies on Innovation and Competition, $x 2199-7462 ; $v 13
505 0 $a Introduction -- Prolegomena -- The relaxation of the link between harm and remedy -- The relaxation of procedural safeguards -- The impact of commitments on legal certainty -- Outlook: Discussions of reform proposals -- Summary of key findings.
520 $a This book provides a comprehensive analysis of the remedies practice the European Commission has adopted on the basis of articles 7 and 9 of regulation 1/03. Using article 7 as a normative benchmark, it shows that most of the criticism levelled at the Commission's article 9 decisions and the Alrosa judgment of the CJEU is not justified, since critics tend to over-state both the rigour of article 7 and the laxness of article 9. Remaining inconsistencies between the commitment practice and the standards for infringement decisions can, it is submitted, be justified by the consensual nature of commitment decisions and their underlying goal of procedural economy. Moreover, it is suggested that too little importance is generally assigned to the beneficial effect which commitments bring about by providing for precise and enforceable obligations without sacrificing the concerned undertakings’ freedom to choose how to put the infringement to an end. Adopting a case-oriented approach, this study provides valuable insights for academics and practitioners alike.
650 2 4 $a European Union Politics. $3 1104958
650 2 4 $a Economic Policy. $3 669185
650 2 4 $a Business Law. $3 1114627
650 1 4 $a European Economic Law. $3 1228415
650 0 $a European Union. $3 556602
650 0 $a Economic policy. $3 555567
650 0 $a Commercial law. $3 560158
650 0 $a Commercial law $x European Economic Community countries. $3 1297169
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 593884
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783662607107
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783662607121
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783662607138
830 0 $a Munich Studies on Innovation and Competition, $x 2199-7462 ; $v 3 $3 1261210
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-60711-4
912 $a ZDB-2-LCR
912 $a ZDB-2-SXLC
950 $a Law and Criminology (SpringerNature-41177)
950 $a Law and Criminology (R0) (SpringerNature-43727)