國立虎尾科技大學 |

The Decline of Public Access and Neo-Liberal Media Regimes

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Decline of Public Access and Neo-Liberal Media Regimes/ by Brian Caterino.
作者:	Caterino, Brian.
面頁冊數:	VIII, 280 p.online resource. :
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
標題:	Mass media—Political aspects. -
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39403-5
ISBN:	9783030394035

The Decline of Public Access and Neo-Liberal Media Regimes
Caterino, Brian.

The Decline of Public Access and Neo-Liberal Media Regimes[electronic resource] /by Brian Caterino. - 1st ed. 2020. - VIII, 280 p.online resource.

1. Public Access in Decline -- 2. The Frankfurt School and its Aftermath -- 3. Public Interest Standards from Radio to Public Television -- 4. The Emergence of Public Access Television -- 5. Neo-liberalism the Public Sphere and the Decline of Public Obligation -- 6. Access Under Attack: Some Examples -- 7. Looking Through the Wrong End of the Telescope: Internet Democracy vs Public Access -- 8. A Future for Public Access?.

This book examines the reasons behind the declining fortunes of public access channels. Public access, which provided perhaps the boldest experiment in popular media democracy, is in steep decline. While some have argued it is technologically outmoded, Caterino argues that the real reason lies with the rise of a neo-liberal media regime. This regime creates a climate in which we can understand these changes. This book considers the role of neo-liberalism in transforming notions of public obligations and regulation of media that have impacted non-profit media, specifically public access. Neo-liberalism has tried to eliminate public forums and public discourse and weakens institutions of civil society. Though social media is often championed as an arena of communicative freedom, Caterino argues that neo-liberalism has created a colonized social media environment that severely limits popular democracy.

ISBN: 9783030394035

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-030-39403-5doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

1280868
Mass media—Political aspects.

LC Class. No.: P95.8-.82

Dewey Class. No.: 302.23

The Decline of Public Access and Neo-Liberal Media Regimes
LDR:02735nam a22004095i 4500 001 1022490
003 DE-He213
005 20200701094457.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 210318s2020 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020 $a 9783030394035 $9 978-3-030-39403-5
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-030-39403-5 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-030-39403-5
050 4 $a P95.8-.82
072 7 $a JFD $2 bicssc
072 7 $a SOC052000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a JBCT $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 302.23 $2 23
082 0 4 $a 320.6 $2 23
100 1 $a Caterino, Brian. $4 aut $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut $3 573897
245 1 4 $a The Decline of Public Access and Neo-Liberal Media Regimes $h [electronic resource] / $c by Brian Caterino.
250 $a 1st ed. 2020.
264 1 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan, $c 2020.
300 $a VIII, 280 p. $b online resource.
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
347 $a text file $b PDF $2 rda
505 0 $a 1. Public Access in Decline -- 2. The Frankfurt School and its Aftermath -- 3. Public Interest Standards from Radio to Public Television -- 4. The Emergence of Public Access Television -- 5. Neo-liberalism the Public Sphere and the Decline of Public Obligation -- 6. Access Under Attack: Some Examples -- 7. Looking Through the Wrong End of the Telescope: Internet Democracy vs Public Access -- 8. A Future for Public Access?.
520 $a This book examines the reasons behind the declining fortunes of public access channels. Public access, which provided perhaps the boldest experiment in popular media democracy, is in steep decline. While some have argued it is technologically outmoded, Caterino argues that the real reason lies with the rise of a neo-liberal media regime. This regime creates a climate in which we can understand these changes. This book considers the role of neo-liberalism in transforming notions of public obligations and regulation of media that have impacted non-profit media, specifically public access. Neo-liberalism has tried to eliminate public forums and public discourse and weakens institutions of civil society. Though social media is often championed as an arena of communicative freedom, Caterino argues that neo-liberalism has created a colonized social media environment that severely limits popular democracy.
650 0 $a Mass media—Political aspects. $3 1280868
650 0 $a Communication. $3 556422
650 0 $a Cultural policy. $3 593498
650 0 $a Industrial management. $3 556510
650 1 4 $a Media Policy. $3 1172187
650 2 4 $a Media and Communication. $3 1107289
650 2 4 $a Cultural Policy and Politics. $3 1113859
650 2 4 $a Media Management. $3 669579
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 593884
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783030394028
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783030394042
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783030394059
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39403-5
912 $a ZDB-2-LCM
912 $a ZDB-2-SXL
950 $a Literature, Cultural and Media Studies (SpringerNature-41173)
950 $a Literature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0) (SpringerNature-43723)