語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Stepped Care 2.0: A Paradigm Shift i...
~
SpringerLink (Online service)
Stepped Care 2.0: A Paradigm Shift in Mental Health
紀錄類型:
書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Stepped Care 2.0: A Paradigm Shift in Mental Health/ by Peter Cornish.
作者:
Cornish, Peter.
面頁冊數:
XV, 137 p. 24 illus., 19 illus. in color.online resource. :
Contained By:
Springer Nature eBook
標題:
Psychotherapy and Counseling. -
電子資源:
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48055-4
ISBN:
9783030480554
Stepped Care 2.0: A Paradigm Shift in Mental Health
Cornish, Peter.
Stepped Care 2.0: A Paradigm Shift in Mental Health
[electronic resource] /by Peter Cornish. - 1st ed. 2020. - XV, 137 p. 24 illus., 19 illus. in color.online resource.
Chapter 1. We Need a Better System -- Chapter 2. Open Access -- Chapter 3. Recovery Values and Principles -- Chapter 4. Expanding the Options Through Nine Steps -- Chapter 5. Navigating the System -- Chapter 6. Collaboration & Co-Design -- Chapter 7. Adapting for Unique Settings -- Chapter 8. Towards a Paradigm Shift.
This book is a primer on Stepped Care 2.0. It is the first book in a series of three. This primer addresses the increased demand for mental health care by supporting stakeholders (help-seekers, providers, and policy-makers) to collaborate in enhancing care outcomes through work that is both more meaningful and sustainable. Our current mental health system is organized to offer highly intensive psychiatric and psychological care. While undoubtedly effective, demand far exceeds the supply for such specialized programming. Many people seeking to improve their mental health do not need psychiatric medication or sophisticated psychotherapy. A typical help seeker needs basic support. For knee pain, a nurse or physician might first recommend icing and resting the knee, working to achieve a healthy weight, and introducing low impact exercise before considering specialist care. Unfortunately, there is no parallel continuum of care for mental health and wellness. As a result, a person seeking the most basic support must line up and wait for the specialist along with those who may have very severe and/or complex needs. Why are there no lower intensity options? One reason is fear and stigma. A thorough assessment by a specialist is considered best practice. After all, what if we miss signs of suicide or potential harm to others? A reasonable question on the surface; however, the premise is flawed. First, the risk of suicide, or threat to others, for those already seeking care, is low. Second, our technical capacity to predict on these threats is virtually nil. Finally, assessment in our current culture of fear tends to focus more on the identification of deficits (as opposed to functional capacities), leading to over-prescription of expensive remedies and lost opportunities for autonomy and self-management. Despite little evidence linking assessment to treatment outcomes, and no evidence supporting our capacity to detect risk for harm, we persist with lengthy intake assessments and automatic specialist referrals that delay care. Before providers and policy makers can feel comfortable letting go of risk assessment, however, they need to understand the forces underlying the risk paradigm that dominates our society and restricts creative solutions for supporting those in need. SC2.0 reimagines the original UK stepped care model by integrating a range of traditional and emerging online mental health programs systematically within the context of recovery principles and practice. SC2.0 prevents problems from escalating into serious conditions by systematizing shared responsibility for accessing care options at the right time, with the right people, in the right context. Program matching decisions in SC2.0 are also more flexible and client-centric: Rather than stepping only according to diagnosis or symptom severity, one or more options of varying intensity can be jointly selected based on client need, preference, functioning, and readiness for engaging in healing work. .
ISBN: 9783030480554
Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-030-48055-4doiSubjects--Topical Terms:
683807
Psychotherapy and Counseling.
LC Class. No.: R726.7
Dewey Class. No.: 616.89
Stepped Care 2.0: A Paradigm Shift in Mental Health
LDR
:04699nam a22003975i 4500
001
1028625
003
DE-He213
005
20200630193114.0
007
cr nn 008mamaa
008
210318s2020 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020
$a
9783030480554
$9
978-3-030-48055-4
024
7
$a
10.1007/978-3-030-48055-4
$2
doi
035
$a
978-3-030-48055-4
050
4
$a
R726.7
072
7
$a
MBNH9
$2
bicssc
072
7
$a
PSY003000
$2
bisacsh
072
7
$a
MBNH9
$2
thema
082
0 4
$a
616.89
$2
23
100
1
$a
Cornish, Peter.
$e
author.
$4
aut
$4
http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
$3
1325202
245
1 0
$a
Stepped Care 2.0: A Paradigm Shift in Mental Health
$h
[electronic resource] /
$c
by Peter Cornish.
250
$a
1st ed. 2020.
264
1
$a
Cham :
$b
Springer International Publishing :
$b
Imprint: Springer,
$c
2020.
300
$a
XV, 137 p. 24 illus., 19 illus. in color.
$b
online resource.
336
$a
text
$b
txt
$2
rdacontent
337
$a
computer
$b
c
$2
rdamedia
338
$a
online resource
$b
cr
$2
rdacarrier
347
$a
text file
$b
PDF
$2
rda
505
0
$a
Chapter 1. We Need a Better System -- Chapter 2. Open Access -- Chapter 3. Recovery Values and Principles -- Chapter 4. Expanding the Options Through Nine Steps -- Chapter 5. Navigating the System -- Chapter 6. Collaboration & Co-Design -- Chapter 7. Adapting for Unique Settings -- Chapter 8. Towards a Paradigm Shift.
520
$a
This book is a primer on Stepped Care 2.0. It is the first book in a series of three. This primer addresses the increased demand for mental health care by supporting stakeholders (help-seekers, providers, and policy-makers) to collaborate in enhancing care outcomes through work that is both more meaningful and sustainable. Our current mental health system is organized to offer highly intensive psychiatric and psychological care. While undoubtedly effective, demand far exceeds the supply for such specialized programming. Many people seeking to improve their mental health do not need psychiatric medication or sophisticated psychotherapy. A typical help seeker needs basic support. For knee pain, a nurse or physician might first recommend icing and resting the knee, working to achieve a healthy weight, and introducing low impact exercise before considering specialist care. Unfortunately, there is no parallel continuum of care for mental health and wellness. As a result, a person seeking the most basic support must line up and wait for the specialist along with those who may have very severe and/or complex needs. Why are there no lower intensity options? One reason is fear and stigma. A thorough assessment by a specialist is considered best practice. After all, what if we miss signs of suicide or potential harm to others? A reasonable question on the surface; however, the premise is flawed. First, the risk of suicide, or threat to others, for those already seeking care, is low. Second, our technical capacity to predict on these threats is virtually nil. Finally, assessment in our current culture of fear tends to focus more on the identification of deficits (as opposed to functional capacities), leading to over-prescription of expensive remedies and lost opportunities for autonomy and self-management. Despite little evidence linking assessment to treatment outcomes, and no evidence supporting our capacity to detect risk for harm, we persist with lengthy intake assessments and automatic specialist referrals that delay care. Before providers and policy makers can feel comfortable letting go of risk assessment, however, they need to understand the forces underlying the risk paradigm that dominates our society and restricts creative solutions for supporting those in need. SC2.0 reimagines the original UK stepped care model by integrating a range of traditional and emerging online mental health programs systematically within the context of recovery principles and practice. SC2.0 prevents problems from escalating into serious conditions by systematizing shared responsibility for accessing care options at the right time, with the right people, in the right context. Program matching decisions in SC2.0 are also more flexible and client-centric: Rather than stepping only according to diagnosis or symptom severity, one or more options of varying intensity can be jointly selected based on client need, preference, functioning, and readiness for engaging in healing work. .
650
2 4
$a
Psychotherapy and Counseling.
$3
683807
650
2 4
$a
Behavioral Therapy.
$3
593954
650
1 4
$a
Health Psychology.
$3
668198
650
0
$a
Neuropsychology.
$3
556286
650
0
$a
Psychiatry.
$3
585488
650
0
$a
Counseling.
$3
555942
650
0
$a
Psychotherapy.
$3
555943
650
0
$a
Behavioral therapy.
$3
1257972
650
0
$a
Health psychology.
$3
1109770
710
2
$a
SpringerLink (Online service)
$3
593884
773
0
$t
Springer Nature eBook
776
0 8
$i
Printed edition:
$z
9783030480547
776
0 8
$i
Printed edition:
$z
9783030480561
776
0 8
$i
Printed edition:
$z
9783030480578
856
4 0
$u
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48055-4
912
$a
ZDB-2-BSP
912
$a
ZDB-2-SXBP
950
$a
Behavioral Science and Psychology (SpringerNature-41168)
950
$a
Behavioral Science and Psychology (R0) (SpringerNature-43718)
筆 0 讀者評論
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館別
處理中
...
變更密碼[密碼必須為2種組合(英文和數字)及長度為10碼以上]
登入