國立虎尾科技大學 |

Permanent Investment Courts = The European Experiment /

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Permanent Investment Courts/ edited by Güneş Ünüvar, Joanna Lam, Shai Dothan.
Reminder of title:	The European Experiment /
other author:	Ünüvar, Güneş.
Description:	IX, 150 p. 1 illus.online resource. :
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
Subject:	International law. -
Online resource:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45684-9
ISBN:	9783030456849

Permanent Investment Courts = The European Experiment /
Permanent Investment CourtsThe European Experiment /[electronic resource] :edited by Güneş Ünüvar, Joanna Lam, Shai Dothan. - 1st ed. 2020. - IX, 150 p. 1 illus.online resource. - Special Issue,2510-6880. - Special Issue,.

Shai Dothan and Joanna Lam, A Paradigm Shift? Arbitration and Court-Like Mechanisms in Investors' Disputes -- Eleftheria Neframi, Permanent Investment Courts from the Perspective of the EU Legal Order -- Armand de Mestral and Lukas Vanhonnaeker, The North American Experience with Investor-State Arbitration: Does it lead to a Permanent Investment Court? -- Marc Bungenberg and Anna M. Holzer, Potential Enforcement Mechanisms for Decisions of a Multilateral Investment Court -- Güneş Ünüvar and Tim Kreft, Impossible Ethics? An Analysis of the Rules on Ethics and Qualifications of Investment Court Judges. .

This special issue focuses on the opportunities and challenges connected with investment courts. The creation of permanent investment courts was first proposed several decades ago, but it has only recently become likely that these proposals will be implemented. In particular, the European Commission has pushed for a court-like mechanism to resolve investment disputes in various recent trade and investment negotiations. Such a framework was included in some free trade agreements (FTAs) and investment protection agreements (IPAs) the European Union (EU) signed or negotiated with Vietnam, Singapore, Mexico and Canada. While it was shelved long before the publication of this Special Issue, the European Commission had also formally proposed a court system during the negotiations for the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) agreement with the United States. The issue of a Multilateral Investment Court (MIC) has also been prevalent at the Working Group III proceedings of the UNCITRAL on investor-State dispute settlement reform, attracting scholarly and public attention. Will these developments lead to the creation of permanent investment courts? How will such courts change the future of international investment law? Will they bring about a real institutional change in adjudicatory mechanisms? Will they introduce a 'hybrid' system, which borrows important characteristics from both arbitration and institutional methods of international adjudication? How will the enforcement mechanisms work, and under which rules of ethics will its adjudicators function and exercise their duties? This special issue brings together leading scholars sharing a common interest in investment courts to address these questions.

ISBN: 9783030456849

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-030-45684-9doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

557047
International law.

LC Class. No.: K3820-3836

Dewey Class. No.: 343.07

Permanent Investment Courts = The European Experiment /
LDR:03759nam a22004095i 4500 001 1029277
003 DE-He213
005 20200917143317.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 210318s2020 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020 $a 9783030456849 $9 978-3-030-45684-9
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-030-45684-9 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-030-45684-9
050 4 $a K3820-3836
072 7 $a LBBM $2 bicssc
072 7 $a LAW051000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a LBBM $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 343.07 $2 23
245 1 0 $a Permanent Investment Courts $h [electronic resource] : $b The European Experiment / $c edited by Güneş Ünüvar, Joanna Lam, Shai Dothan.
250 $a 1st ed. 2020.
264 1 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2020.
300 $a IX, 150 p. 1 illus. $b online resource.
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
347 $a text file $b PDF $2 rda
490 1 $a Special Issue, $x 2510-6880
505 0 $a Shai Dothan and Joanna Lam, A Paradigm Shift? Arbitration and Court-Like Mechanisms in Investors' Disputes -- Eleftheria Neframi, Permanent Investment Courts from the Perspective of the EU Legal Order -- Armand de Mestral and Lukas Vanhonnaeker, The North American Experience with Investor-State Arbitration: Does it lead to a Permanent Investment Court? -- Marc Bungenberg and Anna M. Holzer, Potential Enforcement Mechanisms for Decisions of a Multilateral Investment Court -- Güneş Ünüvar and Tim Kreft, Impossible Ethics? An Analysis of the Rules on Ethics and Qualifications of Investment Court Judges. .
520 $a This special issue focuses on the opportunities and challenges connected with investment courts. The creation of permanent investment courts was first proposed several decades ago, but it has only recently become likely that these proposals will be implemented. In particular, the European Commission has pushed for a court-like mechanism to resolve investment disputes in various recent trade and investment negotiations. Such a framework was included in some free trade agreements (FTAs) and investment protection agreements (IPAs) the European Union (EU) signed or negotiated with Vietnam, Singapore, Mexico and Canada. While it was shelved long before the publication of this Special Issue, the European Commission had also formally proposed a court system during the negotiations for the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) agreement with the United States. The issue of a Multilateral Investment Court (MIC) has also been prevalent at the Working Group III proceedings of the UNCITRAL on investor-State dispute settlement reform, attracting scholarly and public attention. Will these developments lead to the creation of permanent investment courts? How will such courts change the future of international investment law? Will they bring about a real institutional change in adjudicatory mechanisms? Will they introduce a 'hybrid' system, which borrows important characteristics from both arbitration and institutional methods of international adjudication? How will the enforcement mechanisms work, and under which rules of ethics will its adjudicators function and exercise their duties? This special issue brings together leading scholars sharing a common interest in investment courts to address these questions.
650 0 $a International law. $3 557047
650 0 $a Trade. $3 1019351
650 0 $a Commercial law $x European Economic Community countries. $3 1297169
650 0 $a European Union. $3 556602
650 1 4 $a International Economic Law, Trade Law. $3 882440
650 2 4 $a European Economic Law. $3 1228415
650 2 4 $a European Union Politics. $3 1104958
700 1 $a Ünüvar, Güneş. $e editor. $4 edt $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt $3 1325927
700 1 $a Lam, Joanna. $e editor. $4 edt $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt $3 1325928
700 1 $a Dothan, Shai. $e editor. $4 edt $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt $3 1325929
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 593884
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783030456832
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783030456856
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783030456863
830 0 $a Special Issue, $x 2510-6880 $3 1264951
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45684-9
912 $a ZDB-2-LCR
912 $a ZDB-2-SXLC
950 $a Law and Criminology (SpringerNature-41177)
950 $a Law and Criminology (R0) (SpringerNature-43727)