語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Utopophobia = on the limits (if any)...
~
Estlund, David M.
Utopophobia = on the limits (if any) of political philosophy /
紀錄類型:
書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Utopophobia/ David Estlund.
其他題名:
on the limits (if any) of political philosophy /
作者:
Estlund, David M.
出版者:
Princeton, NJ :Princeton University Press, : c2020.,
面頁冊數:
1 online resource (xvii, 377 p.)
標題:
Political science - Philosophy. -
電子資源:
https://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9780691197500
ISBN:
9780691197500
Utopophobia = on the limits (if any) of political philosophy /
Estlund, David M.
Utopophobia
on the limits (if any) of political philosophy /[electronic resource] :David Estlund. - 1st ed. - Princeton, NJ :Princeton University Press,c2020. - 1 online resource (xvii, 377 p.)
Includes bibliographical references and index.
"Throughout the history of political philosophy and politics more broadly a debate has raged about the proper place of idealism versus realism in our thinking about political principles and institutions. Within contemporary political philosophy, this debate has taken the form of what is called "ideal theory" versus "non-ideal theory." Non-ideal theorists have tried to shift the focus of political philosophy from theorizing about the nature of concepts like "justice" to questions about which feasible institutional and political changes would make a society, or the world, more just. But what if, the ideal theorist asks, justice is a standard that no society is likely ever to satisfy? Could we somehow even know this is the case before seriously considering what justice requires? And, if social justice were unrealistic, would that mean that understanding justice is without value or importance, and merely idle utopianism? In Utopophobia, David Estlund argues that the best reasons for thinking either that justice must be realistic, or for thinking that there is no point in understanding justice unless it could be realized, are not convincing. No particular theory of justice is offered or presupposed by Estlund in this book, nor is it argued that justice is indeed unrealizable-only that it could be, and that this possibility upsets common ways of proceeding in political thought. The book, thus, represents a critical engagement with important strands in traditional and contemporary political philosophy which suppose that a sound theory of justice, or even the enterprise of political philosophy generally, has the sole or overriding and defining task of contributing practical guidance toward greater social justice. Along the way, Estlund argues against several tempting views; that the "circumstances of justice," as understood by Hume and Rawls, imply that the very idea of social justice is grounded in unfortunate but realistic conditions of individual moral deficiency; that inquiry in political philosophy could have significant value only insofar as it guides to practical political action; and that understanding true justice would necessarily have practical value, at least as an ideal arrangement to be approximated"--
ISBN: 9780691197500Subjects--Topical Terms:
564713
Political science
--Philosophy.
LC Class. No.: B105.J87 / E77 2020
Dewey Class. No.: 320.01/1
Utopophobia = on the limits (if any) of political philosophy /
LDR
:03192cam a2200265 a 4500
001
1042033
003
OCoLC
005
20200604050411.0
006
m o d
007
cr cnu---unuuu
008
211216s2020 nju ob 001 0 eng d
020
$a
9780691197500
$q
(electronic bk.)
020
$a
0691197504
$q
(electronic bk.)
020
$z
9780691147161
$q
(hbk.)
035
$a
1113321971
040
$a
DLC
$b
eng
$c
DLC
$d
OCLCO
$d
OCLCF
$d
JSTOR
$d
N
$d
YDX
$d
P@U
$d
K6U
$d
OCLCQ
$d
UKOUP
050
0 4
$a
B105.J87
$b
E77 2020
082
0 0
$a
320.01/1
$2
23
100
1
$a
Estlund, David M.
$3
1342102
245
1 0
$a
Utopophobia
$h
[electronic resource] :
$b
on the limits (if any) of political philosophy /
$c
David Estlund.
250
$a
1st ed.
260
$a
Princeton, NJ :
$b
Princeton University Press,
$c
c2020.
300
$a
1 online resource (xvii, 377 p.)
504
$a
Includes bibliographical references and index.
520
$a
"Throughout the history of political philosophy and politics more broadly a debate has raged about the proper place of idealism versus realism in our thinking about political principles and institutions. Within contemporary political philosophy, this debate has taken the form of what is called "ideal theory" versus "non-ideal theory." Non-ideal theorists have tried to shift the focus of political philosophy from theorizing about the nature of concepts like "justice" to questions about which feasible institutional and political changes would make a society, or the world, more just. But what if, the ideal theorist asks, justice is a standard that no society is likely ever to satisfy? Could we somehow even know this is the case before seriously considering what justice requires? And, if social justice were unrealistic, would that mean that understanding justice is without value or importance, and merely idle utopianism? In Utopophobia, David Estlund argues that the best reasons for thinking either that justice must be realistic, or for thinking that there is no point in understanding justice unless it could be realized, are not convincing. No particular theory of justice is offered or presupposed by Estlund in this book, nor is it argued that justice is indeed unrealizable-only that it could be, and that this possibility upsets common ways of proceeding in political thought. The book, thus, represents a critical engagement with important strands in traditional and contemporary political philosophy which suppose that a sound theory of justice, or even the enterprise of political philosophy generally, has the sole or overriding and defining task of contributing practical guidance toward greater social justice. Along the way, Estlund argues against several tempting views; that the "circumstances of justice," as understood by Hume and Rawls, imply that the very idea of social justice is grounded in unfortunate but realistic conditions of individual moral deficiency; that inquiry in political philosophy could have significant value only insofar as it guides to practical political action; and that understanding true justice would necessarily have practical value, at least as an ideal arrangement to be approximated"--
$c
Provided by publisher.
588
$a
Description based on print version record.
650
0
$a
Political science
$x
Philosophy.
$3
564713
650
0
$a
Realism.
$3
567326
650
0
$a
Idealism.
$3
577685
650
0
$a
Justice (Philosophy)
$3
560289
856
4 0
$u
https://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9780691197500
筆 0 讀者評論
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館別
處理中
...
變更密碼[密碼必須為2種組合(英文和數字)及長度為10碼以上]
登入