國立虎尾科技大學 |

Secession in the Formal-Legalist Paradigm = Implications for Contemporary Revolutionary and Popular Movements in the Age of Neoliberal Globalization /

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Secession in the Formal-Legalist Paradigm/ by Kenneth E. Bauzon.
其他題名:	Implications for Contemporary Revolutionary and Popular Movements in the Age of Neoliberal Globalization /
作者:	Bauzon, Kenneth E.
面頁冊數:	XVIII, 137 p. 1 illus.online resource. :
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
標題:	Political theory. -
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7501-3
ISBN:	9789811575013

Secession in the Formal-Legalist Paradigm = Implications for Contemporary Revolutionary and Popular Movements in the Age of Neoliberal Globalization /
Bauzon, Kenneth E.

Secession in the Formal-Legalist ParadigmImplications for Contemporary Revolutionary and Popular Movements in the Age of Neoliberal Globalization /[electronic resource] :by Kenneth E. Bauzon. - 1st ed. 2021. - XVIII, 137 p. 1 illus.online resource.

1. Introduction -- 2. The Formal-Legalist Explanation -- 3. Critique of Formal-Legalism -- 4. The Return of Historical Materialism -- 5. Epilogue.

This book explores how formal-legalism, as the dominant paradigm of explanation, has sought to explain the phenomenon of secessionism among its practitioners as a problem for the modern state. This study bears how these practitioners have, over time, described, defined, and proposed to solve secessionism and related political problems within the logic of their paradigm. In the process, the book reconstructs the formalist worldview and the practitioners’ fundamental presuppositions which, to them, render comprehensible and meaningful the occurrence of events, like secession, as well as means of dealing with it. More significantly, the book exposes a debilitating flaw of formal-legalist paradigm as it fails to account for other principles of mobilization in political and social life that defy formal-legal rules such as those based on race, ethnicity, language, culture, and material factors. Narrow adherence to textual sources and the literal approach, have led formal-legalists to miss, willfully ignore, or endorse the paradigm's strategic association with state power, evolving since the dawn of the Enlightenment. Formal-legalism has lent itself amenable to the interests of the state and to the variable construction of the meaning of the law devoid of original spirit and universality but conforming with the specific interests of the state or, for that matter, the prevailing American empire, both spatially and temporally. Accounting for this anomaly, the historical materialist perspective is considered, with appropriate historical and contemporary illustrations, as a relevant explanatory alternative to the now-obsolescent formal-legalist paradigm. With the assumption that, indeed, economic and material considerations such as those demanded by the dominant class elements within the state underlie the rationale for the state, formal-legalism has evolved from one that initially provided a presumed objective view of society to one that has subjectively become an essential part of the cultural suprastructure that allows these elements to command the state as a principal tool for labor- and value-extraction during what is popularly known as contemporary neoliberal globalization. Kenneth E. Bauzon, with a doctorate in Political Science from Duke University, in Durham, North Carolina, is currently Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph's College in New York, USA. .

ISBN: 9789811575013

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-981-15-7501-3doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

1253540
Political theory.

LC Class. No.: JC11-607

Dewey Class. No.: 320.01

Secession in the Formal-Legalist Paradigm = Implications for Contemporary Revolutionary and Popular Movements in the Age of Neoliberal Globalization /
LDR:03977nam a22003855i 4500 001 1049668
003 DE-He213
005 20210625170842.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 220103s2021 si | s |||| 0|eng d
020 $a 9789811575013 $9 978-981-15-7501-3
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-981-15-7501-3 $2 doi
035 $a 978-981-15-7501-3
050 4 $a JC11-607
072 7 $a JPA $2 bicssc
072 7 $a POL010000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a JPA $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 320.01 $2 23
100 1 $a Bauzon, Kenneth E. $e author. $4 aut $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut $3 1308087
245 1 0 $a Secession in the Formal-Legalist Paradigm $h [electronic resource] : $b Implications for Contemporary Revolutionary and Popular Movements in the Age of Neoliberal Globalization / $c by Kenneth E. Bauzon.
250 $a 1st ed. 2021.
264 1 $a Singapore : $b Springer Singapore : $b Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan, $c 2021.
300 $a XVIII, 137 p. 1 illus. $b online resource.
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
347 $a text file $b PDF $2 rda
505 0 $a 1. Introduction -- 2. The Formal-Legalist Explanation -- 3. Critique of Formal-Legalism -- 4. The Return of Historical Materialism -- 5. Epilogue.
520 $a This book explores how formal-legalism, as the dominant paradigm of explanation, has sought to explain the phenomenon of secessionism among its practitioners as a problem for the modern state. This study bears how these practitioners have, over time, described, defined, and proposed to solve secessionism and related political problems within the logic of their paradigm. In the process, the book reconstructs the formalist worldview and the practitioners’ fundamental presuppositions which, to them, render comprehensible and meaningful the occurrence of events, like secession, as well as means of dealing with it. More significantly, the book exposes a debilitating flaw of formal-legalist paradigm as it fails to account for other principles of mobilization in political and social life that defy formal-legal rules such as those based on race, ethnicity, language, culture, and material factors. Narrow adherence to textual sources and the literal approach, have led formal-legalists to miss, willfully ignore, or endorse the paradigm's strategic association with state power, evolving since the dawn of the Enlightenment. Formal-legalism has lent itself amenable to the interests of the state and to the variable construction of the meaning of the law devoid of original spirit and universality but conforming with the specific interests of the state or, for that matter, the prevailing American empire, both spatially and temporally. Accounting for this anomaly, the historical materialist perspective is considered, with appropriate historical and contemporary illustrations, as a relevant explanatory alternative to the now-obsolescent formal-legalist paradigm. With the assumption that, indeed, economic and material considerations such as those demanded by the dominant class elements within the state underlie the rationale for the state, formal-legalism has evolved from one that initially provided a presumed objective view of society to one that has subjectively become an essential part of the cultural suprastructure that allows these elements to command the state as a principal tool for labor- and value-extraction during what is popularly known as contemporary neoliberal globalization. Kenneth E. Bauzon, with a doctorate in Political Science from Duke University, in Durham, North Carolina, is currently Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph's College in New York, USA. .
650 0 $a Political theory. $3 1253540
650 0 $a Philosophy. $3 559771
650 0 $a Postcolonialism. $3 558968
650 0 $a Political sociology. $3 559756
650 0 $a Economic development. $3 555228
650 1 4 $a Political Theory. $3 890169
650 2 4 $a Postcolonial Philosophy. $3 1197716
650 2 4 $a Political Sociology. $3 1107317
650 2 4 $a Development and Post-Colonialism. $3 1173464
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 593884
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9789811575006
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9789811575020
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7501-3
912 $a ZDB-2-POS
912 $a ZDB-2-SXPI
950 $a Political Science and International Studies (SpringerNature-41174)
950 $a Political Science and International Studies (R0) (SpringerNature-43724)