語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Supreme Courts Under Pressure = Cont...
~
Bravo-Hurtado, Pablo.
Supreme Courts Under Pressure = Controlling Caseload in the Administration of Civil Justice /
紀錄類型:
書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Supreme Courts Under Pressure/ edited by Pablo Bravo-Hurtado, Cornelis Hendrik van Rhee.
其他題名:
Controlling Caseload in the Administration of Civil Justice /
其他作者:
van Rhee, Cornelis Hendrik.
面頁冊數:
VII, 233 p. 5 illus.online resource. :
Contained By:
Springer Nature eBook
標題:
Civil Law. -
電子資源:
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63731-6
ISBN:
9783030637316
Supreme Courts Under Pressure = Controlling Caseload in the Administration of Civil Justice /
Supreme Courts Under Pressure
Controlling Caseload in the Administration of Civil Justice /[electronic resource] :edited by Pablo Bravo-Hurtado, Cornelis Hendrik van Rhee. - 1st ed. 2021. - VII, 233 p. 5 illus.online resource. - Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice,832214-9902 ;. - Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice,42.
Introduction -- Towards a Reform of the French Court of Cassation? -- Finding a Cure or Simply Relieving Symptoms? The Case of the Italian Supreme Court -- Back in Focus: Case Overload and Case Selection Standards in the Spanish Supreme Court -- Sharing Responsibility: The German Federal Court of Justice and the Civil Appellate System -- Access to the Austrian Oberster Gerichtshof: Attempts to Strike a Balance Between Adequate Workload and Adequate Review -- Croatia: Supreme Court between Individual Justice and System Management -- The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom and the Court of Appeal in England and Wales: Sharing the Appellate Load -- A Happy-Go-Lucky Story: The American Supreme Court and Overload Problems -- Case Selection and Writ of Certiorari in Argentina: ‘Transcendence’ as a Case-Selection Parameter at the Federal Supreme Court.
This book discusses civil litigation at the supreme courts of nine jurisdictions – Argentina, Austria, Croatia, England and Wales, France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the United States – and focuses on the available instruments used to keep the caseload of these courts within acceptable limits. Such instruments are necessary in order to allow supreme courts to fulfil their main duties, that is, the administration of justice in individual cases (private function) and providing for the uniformity and development of the law within their respective jurisdictions (public function). If the number of cases at the supreme court level is too high, the result is undue delays, which are mainly problematic with regard to the private function. It may also put the quality of the court’s judgments under pressure, which can affect its public and private function alike. Thus, measures aimed at avoiding excessive caseloads need to take both functions into account. Increasing the capacity of the court to handle larger numbers of cases may result in the court being unable to adequately fulfil its public function, since large numbers of court decisions make it difficult to guarantee the uniformity of the law and its development. Therefore, a balanced approach is needed to safeguard capacity and quality. As shown by the contributions gathered here, the nature of reform in this area is not the same everywhere. There are a variety of reasons for this heterogeneity, ranging from different understandings of the caseload problem itself, local conceptions regarding the purpose of the Supreme Court, and strong entitlements concerning the right to appeal to budgetary restrictions and extremely rigid legislation. The book also shows that the implementation of similar solutions to case overload, such as access filters, may have different effects in different jurisdictions. The conclusion might well be that the problem of overburdened courts is multifactorial and context-dependent, and that easy, one-size-fits-all solutions are hard to find and perhaps even harder to implement.
ISBN: 9783030637316
Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-030-63731-6doiSubjects--Topical Terms:
671948
Civil Law.
LC Class. No.: K7000-7720.22
Dewey Class. No.: 340.9
Supreme Courts Under Pressure = Controlling Caseload in the Administration of Civil Justice /
LDR
:04523nam a22004455i 4500
001
1049943
003
DE-He213
005
20211014214803.0
007
cr nn 008mamaa
008
220103s2021 sz | s |||| 0|eng d
020
$a
9783030637316
$9
978-3-030-63731-6
024
7
$a
10.1007/978-3-030-63731-6
$2
doi
035
$a
978-3-030-63731-6
050
4
$a
K7000-7720.22
050
4
$a
K7073-7078
072
7
$a
LB
$2
bicssc
072
7
$a
LAW051000
$2
bisacsh
072
7
$a
LB
$2
thema
072
7
$a
LAM
$2
thema
082
0 4
$a
340.9
$2
23
082
0 4
$a
340.2
$2
23
245
1 0
$a
Supreme Courts Under Pressure
$h
[electronic resource] :
$b
Controlling Caseload in the Administration of Civil Justice /
$c
edited by Pablo Bravo-Hurtado, Cornelis Hendrik van Rhee.
250
$a
1st ed. 2021.
264
1
$a
Cham :
$b
Springer International Publishing :
$b
Imprint: Springer,
$c
2021.
300
$a
VII, 233 p. 5 illus.
$b
online resource.
336
$a
text
$b
txt
$2
rdacontent
337
$a
computer
$b
c
$2
rdamedia
338
$a
online resource
$b
cr
$2
rdacarrier
347
$a
text file
$b
PDF
$2
rda
490
1
$a
Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice,
$x
2214-9902 ;
$v
83
505
0
$a
Introduction -- Towards a Reform of the French Court of Cassation? -- Finding a Cure or Simply Relieving Symptoms? The Case of the Italian Supreme Court -- Back in Focus: Case Overload and Case Selection Standards in the Spanish Supreme Court -- Sharing Responsibility: The German Federal Court of Justice and the Civil Appellate System -- Access to the Austrian Oberster Gerichtshof: Attempts to Strike a Balance Between Adequate Workload and Adequate Review -- Croatia: Supreme Court between Individual Justice and System Management -- The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom and the Court of Appeal in England and Wales: Sharing the Appellate Load -- A Happy-Go-Lucky Story: The American Supreme Court and Overload Problems -- Case Selection and Writ of Certiorari in Argentina: ‘Transcendence’ as a Case-Selection Parameter at the Federal Supreme Court.
520
$a
This book discusses civil litigation at the supreme courts of nine jurisdictions – Argentina, Austria, Croatia, England and Wales, France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the United States – and focuses on the available instruments used to keep the caseload of these courts within acceptable limits. Such instruments are necessary in order to allow supreme courts to fulfil their main duties, that is, the administration of justice in individual cases (private function) and providing for the uniformity and development of the law within their respective jurisdictions (public function). If the number of cases at the supreme court level is too high, the result is undue delays, which are mainly problematic with regard to the private function. It may also put the quality of the court’s judgments under pressure, which can affect its public and private function alike. Thus, measures aimed at avoiding excessive caseloads need to take both functions into account. Increasing the capacity of the court to handle larger numbers of cases may result in the court being unable to adequately fulfil its public function, since large numbers of court decisions make it difficult to guarantee the uniformity of the law and its development. Therefore, a balanced approach is needed to safeguard capacity and quality. As shown by the contributions gathered here, the nature of reform in this area is not the same everywhere. There are a variety of reasons for this heterogeneity, ranging from different understandings of the caseload problem itself, local conceptions regarding the purpose of the Supreme Court, and strong entitlements concerning the right to appeal to budgetary restrictions and extremely rigid legislation. The book also shows that the implementation of similar solutions to case overload, such as access filters, may have different effects in different jurisdictions. The conclusion might well be that the problem of overburdened courts is multifactorial and context-dependent, and that easy, one-size-fits-all solutions are hard to find and perhaps even harder to implement.
650
2 4
$a
Civil Law.
$3
671948
650
1 4
$a
Private International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law .
$3
1209897
650
0
$a
Civil law.
$3
869545
650
0
$a
Conflict of laws.
$3
560163
650
0
$a
Private international law.
$3
1202562
700
1
$a
van Rhee, Cornelis Hendrik.
$e
editor.
$4
edt
$4
http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
$3
1354183
700
1
$a
Bravo-Hurtado, Pablo.
$e
editor.
$4
edt
$4
http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
$3
1354182
710
2
$a
SpringerLink (Online service)
$3
593884
773
0
$t
Springer Nature eBook
776
0 8
$i
Printed edition:
$z
9783030637309
776
0 8
$i
Printed edition:
$z
9783030637323
776
0 8
$i
Printed edition:
$z
9783030637330
830
0
$a
Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice,
$x
1534-6781 ;
$v
42
$3
1253974
856
4 0
$u
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63731-6
912
$a
ZDB-2-LCR
912
$a
ZDB-2-SXLC
950
$a
Law and Criminology (SpringerNature-41177)
950
$a
Law and Criminology (R0) (SpringerNature-43727)
筆 0 讀者評論
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館別
處理中
...
變更密碼[密碼必須為2種組合(英文和數字)及長度為10碼以上]
登入