語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Theory of Legal Evidence - Evidence ...
~
SpringerLink (Online service)
Theory of Legal Evidence - Evidence in Legal Theory
紀錄類型:
書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Theory of Legal Evidence - Evidence in Legal Theory/ edited by Verena Klappstein, Maciej Dybowski.
其他作者:
Dybowski, Maciej.
面頁冊數:
VI, 276 p. 4 illus., 3 illus. in color.online resource. :
Contained By:
Springer Nature eBook
標題:
Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History. -
電子資源:
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83841-6
ISBN:
9783030838416
Theory of Legal Evidence - Evidence in Legal Theory
Theory of Legal Evidence - Evidence in Legal Theory
[electronic resource] /edited by Verena Klappstein, Maciej Dybowski. - 1st ed. 2021. - VI, 276 p. 4 illus., 3 illus. in color.online resource. - Law and Philosophy Library,1382215-0315 ;. - Law and Philosophy Library,111.
Olivier Leclerc, Can there be a science of proof? A Cross-Atlantic dialogue (1898-1947) -- Maciej Dybowski, A Good Enough (Meta) Theory of Evidence in Law. An Inferentialist Account -- Weronika Dzięgielewska, Why Are We Bound by Evidence? On The Normative Stance of Legal Proof -- Bohdan Pretkiel, Rethinking expert opinion evidence as an argument from epistemic authority -- Margarida Lacombe Camargo, Constitutional Evidence -- Giovanni Tuzet, Testimony and Hearsay -- Marcin Romanowicz, Neuroscientific Evidence in Courtroom: Clash of Two Anthropological Paradigms -- John R. Harris, An Epistemic Defense of Exclusionary Rules in the Criminal Justice System -- Adam Dyrda and Maciej Próchnicki, Expert’s (Meta)Testimony: An Epistemological Perspective -- Daniela Accatino, The Architecture of Evidential Justification between Atomism and Holism.
This book addresses theoretical problems concerning legal evidence. The concept of evidence is expected to fulfill a number of distinct roles in science and philosophy, but also in legal theory and law, some of which are complementary, while others are conflicting. In their profession, lawyers have to deal with evidence and proof. Yet the legal concept of evidence is constantly changing, and the debate concerning the distinction between a legal concept of evidence, the ordinary concept of evidence and the concept of evidence in science is far from being settled. What is more, the problem of evidence is central to both epistemology and the philosophy of science, and by extension to our academic thinking on law. In short, legal theorists’ interest in evidence may include such diverse objects as a bloody knife, sensory data, linguistic entities or psychologically recognized beliefs. The book surveys selected theoretical roles that the concept of evidence plays and explores their relations and interconnections. The content is divided into three parts, investigating: (1) evidence in epistemology and the philosophy of science, which focuses on evidence methodologies and the problem of proof in legal scholarship; (2) evidence in legal theory and legal philosophy, where particular attention is paid to the interplay between evidence, legal reasoning and the binding force of such reasoning; and (3) evidence in law, where theoretical problems pertaining to witnesses, expert opinions, explanations of the accused, statistical evidence and neuroscientific evidence are examined.
ISBN: 9783030838416
Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-030-83841-6doiSubjects--Topical Terms:
883676
Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History.
LC Class. No.: K201-487
Dewey Class. No.: 340.1
Theory of Legal Evidence - Evidence in Legal Theory
LDR
:03899nam a22004215i 4500
001
1059523
003
DE-He213
005
20220112012027.0
007
cr nn 008mamaa
008
220414s2021 sz | s |||| 0|eng d
020
$a
9783030838416
$9
978-3-030-83841-6
024
7
$a
10.1007/978-3-030-83841-6
$2
doi
035
$a
978-3-030-83841-6
050
4
$a
K201-487
050
4
$a
K140-165
072
7
$a
LAB
$2
bicssc
072
7
$a
LAW079000
$2
bisacsh
072
7
$a
LAB
$2
thema
082
0 4
$a
340.1
$2
23
245
1 0
$a
Theory of Legal Evidence - Evidence in Legal Theory
$h
[electronic resource] /
$c
edited by Verena Klappstein, Maciej Dybowski.
250
$a
1st ed. 2021.
264
1
$a
Cham :
$b
Springer International Publishing :
$b
Imprint: Springer,
$c
2021.
300
$a
VI, 276 p. 4 illus., 3 illus. in color.
$b
online resource.
336
$a
text
$b
txt
$2
rdacontent
337
$a
computer
$b
c
$2
rdamedia
338
$a
online resource
$b
cr
$2
rdacarrier
347
$a
text file
$b
PDF
$2
rda
490
1
$a
Law and Philosophy Library,
$x
2215-0315 ;
$v
138
505
0
$a
Olivier Leclerc, Can there be a science of proof? A Cross-Atlantic dialogue (1898-1947) -- Maciej Dybowski, A Good Enough (Meta) Theory of Evidence in Law. An Inferentialist Account -- Weronika Dzięgielewska, Why Are We Bound by Evidence? On The Normative Stance of Legal Proof -- Bohdan Pretkiel, Rethinking expert opinion evidence as an argument from epistemic authority -- Margarida Lacombe Camargo, Constitutional Evidence -- Giovanni Tuzet, Testimony and Hearsay -- Marcin Romanowicz, Neuroscientific Evidence in Courtroom: Clash of Two Anthropological Paradigms -- John R. Harris, An Epistemic Defense of Exclusionary Rules in the Criminal Justice System -- Adam Dyrda and Maciej Próchnicki, Expert’s (Meta)Testimony: An Epistemological Perspective -- Daniela Accatino, The Architecture of Evidential Justification between Atomism and Holism.
520
$a
This book addresses theoretical problems concerning legal evidence. The concept of evidence is expected to fulfill a number of distinct roles in science and philosophy, but also in legal theory and law, some of which are complementary, while others are conflicting. In their profession, lawyers have to deal with evidence and proof. Yet the legal concept of evidence is constantly changing, and the debate concerning the distinction between a legal concept of evidence, the ordinary concept of evidence and the concept of evidence in science is far from being settled. What is more, the problem of evidence is central to both epistemology and the philosophy of science, and by extension to our academic thinking on law. In short, legal theorists’ interest in evidence may include such diverse objects as a bloody knife, sensory data, linguistic entities or psychologically recognized beliefs. The book surveys selected theoretical roles that the concept of evidence plays and explores their relations and interconnections. The content is divided into three parts, investigating: (1) evidence in epistemology and the philosophy of science, which focuses on evidence methodologies and the problem of proof in legal scholarship; (2) evidence in legal theory and legal philosophy, where particular attention is paid to the interplay between evidence, legal reasoning and the binding force of such reasoning; and (3) evidence in law, where theoretical problems pertaining to witnesses, expert opinions, explanations of the accused, statistical evidence and neuroscientific evidence are examined.
650
1 4
$a
Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History.
$3
883676
650
0
$a
Law—History.
$3
1269221
650
0
$a
Law—Philosophy.
$3
1253604
700
1
$a
Dybowski, Maciej.
$4
edt
$4
http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
$3
1203880
700
1
$a
Klappstein, Verena.
$4
edt
$4
http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
$3
1203879
710
2
$a
SpringerLink (Online service)
$3
593884
773
0
$t
Springer Nature eBook
776
0 8
$i
Printed edition:
$z
9783030838409
776
0 8
$i
Printed edition:
$z
9783030838423
776
0 8
$i
Printed edition:
$z
9783030838430
830
0
$a
Law and Philosophy Library,
$x
1572-4395 ;
$v
111
$3
1261486
856
4 0
$u
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83841-6
912
$a
ZDB-2-LCR
912
$a
ZDB-2-SXLC
950
$a
Law and Criminology (SpringerNature-41177)
950
$a
Law and Criminology (R0) (SpringerNature-43727)
筆 0 讀者評論
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館別
處理中
...
變更密碼[密碼必須為2種組合(英文和數字)及長度為10碼以上]
登入