國立虎尾科技大學 |

Mad Knowledges and User-Led Research

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Mad Knowledges and User-Led Research / by Diana Susan Rose.
作者:	Rose, Diana Susan.
面頁冊數:	XXVII, 322 p. 1 illus.online resource. :
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
標題:	Sociology of Knowledge and Discourse. -
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07551-3
ISBN:	9783031075513

Mad Knowledges and User-Led Research
Rose, Diana Susan.

Mad Knowledges and User-Led Research [electronic resource] /by Diana Susan Rose. - 1st ed. 2022. - XXVII, 322 p. 1 illus.online resource. - The Politics of Mental Health and Illness,2731-5274. - The Politics of Mental Health and Illness,.

Part I Setting the Scene -- 1 What Does Madness Articulate? -- Background -- When Madness Begins to Speak What Does ‘It’ Say? -- Mobilising as Speaking Back? -- Non-uniformity -- Who Speaks? -- The Underground -- The Field -- The ‘Mainstreams’ of Survivor Voices—Psychiatry -- The Academy and ‘Psy’ Research -- Speaking Back to Austerity -- Conclusion -- References -- 2 Mental Challenges as Constitutive of Marginalisation? -- Background -- Collectives -- The Clinical Encounter -- Out of the Hospital -- Can Communities be Developed? -- Psychiatric Facilities and Policies as Obstacles to Forming Groups -- Survivors as a ‘Marginalised Community’ -- Counter-Narratives from the Mainstream -- Activism -- What Is to be Done? -- Conclusion -- References -- Part II User Involvement in Research—England as a Case Study -- 3 History of Patient and Public Involvement in England -- Background and Summary -- Language and Representation -- Who Is the Public? -- Can I Apply? -- What Is ‘Meaningful’ Involvement? -- Power -- Changes in Structures -- Research by ‘Lay’ People Outside Official Structures -- Hidden from PPI—Lay Research -- Conclusion -- References -- 4 Research and Practice or What About the Wild? -- The Problems -- Scope -- Impact: The Beginning -- The Question of ‘Impact’ in Involvement Activities -- What Is Meant by the Term ‘Impact’? Two Approaches -- Evidence-Based Medicine (EbM) -- Science and Technology Studies -- Survivor Research and Change -- The Fundamental Difference -- Where Does Madness Sit in the PPI Terrain? -- Back to ‘Impact’ -- What Happens When PPI Happens? -- The Secret of Process -- Process Evaluations -- Going Beyond PPI -- Conclusion -- References -- 5 Working with Others and ‘Coproduction’ -- Background -- Does Everybody Agree? -- Addressing the Field -- Relevant Themes -- Settings, Partners and Mental Health -- Historical Aspects of Coproduction -- Examples of Coproduction? -- The Costs of Coproduction? -- Partners and Allies -- Power Again -- Conclusion -- References -- Part III Foundational Categories and User-Led Research -- 6 Experience as a Foundation of Knowledge-Making: What’s in a Name? -- Background -- Process -- Naming -- Terminology, Identity and ‘Who Counts’ -- Lived Experience -- Disability Under Erasure -- From Soft to Strong and Back Again -- Survivordom -- A Third Way? -- Implications of Names -- Experts and How Should We Talk to Them? -- The Move to Lived Experience -- Activism and Knowledge-Making -- Conclusion -- References -- 7 Experience: What’s in a Foundational Category? -- Background -- Examples from the Literature -- Whose Experiences Does Research Need? -- Mental Health Specifically -- Diversity -- Lived Experience: What Is It? -- Liminal Identities in Liminal Spaces -- Individual and Collective Experience -- Conclusion: Experience in Context -- References -- 8 Specific Projects Led by Service Users -- Background -- Being a User/Survivor Researcher -- Example 1: Consumer/Patient-Centred Systematic Reviews -- Analysis from the Present -- Example 2: Participatory Research -- User-Generated Outcome Measures -- Outcome Measures -- VOICE -- Delving into the Conversations -- Participatory Research and Power -- Ethics -- Community Validation -- Modifying the Model -- Is There a ‘Community’ of Mental Health Service Users/Survivors? -- Conclusion -- References -- Part IV Guiding Principles -- 9 Intersectionality and Mental Life Disturbed -- Background -- Approach -- Women and Madness -- Practice -- Mad Politics -- Feminist Therapy and Structural Violence -- Racialisation and Madness in the West -- The Sharp End of Psychiatry -- A White Survivor Movement -- Problems -- Conclusion -- References -- 10 Conclusion -- Theory -- Conditions for Silencing Madness -- Mental Health and Meaning in the West -- War -- Trauma -- Not All Meaning Is Therapeutic -- If Madness Is Meaningful What Are Its Conditions? -- The Routledge International Handbook of Mad Studies -- The Social Model of Disability -- Psychosocial Disability -- Reasonable Accommodations -- What Is Madness? -- Activism and Last Words -- Joining up Conditions -- Implications for Research -- Activism as Knowledge—A Provocation -- Conclusion -- References -- Index.

“Diana Rose digs deeply and widely into how knowledge of madness is produced, by whom, in what ways, and to what ends. Her account is both erudite and infused with her own and others' experiences.” —Sue E Estroff, Professor in the Department of Social Medicine, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, USA This book presents a critical examination of the development of user involvement within research, and investigates the issues currently preventing a productive integration of Mad knowledges within research and practice. Drawing on social, linguistic and critical theories, it proposes the conditions needed to address the development of Mad epistemologies. The author’s unique approach deliberately highlights her own positionality and draws on decades of experience as a service recipient, survivor, activist and researcher to illustrate the structural and symbolic barriers faced. Employing concepts including epistemic injustice, individualization, normalization and structural violence, it suggests a radically new way of articulating ‘what’s the matter with us?’ In doing so, the book itself goes some way towards enacting the radical challenge to academic and epistemic hierarchies which, it is argued, will be required to further advance mad knowledges and user-led research. Crucially, it demonstrates how this approach can be both methodologically and conceptually rigorous. This novel work holds important insights for students and scholars across the humanities and social sciences; particularly those working in the areas of critical psychology, disability studies, Mad studies, feminist studies, critical race theory, and Queer theory. Diana Susan Rose retired in 2020 and is now Distinguished Honorary Professor at the Australian National University. She has had two academic careers, interspersed with a period of ‘living in the community’ having been retired from her first position on mental health grounds. She pioneered user-focused research in a London NGO and subsequently worked at King’s College London where she became Professor of User-Led Research in 2013. Her previous works include This is Survivor Research (2009 co-edited with Peter Beresford, Alison Faulkner, Angela Sweeney, and Mary Nettle). .

ISBN: 9783031075513

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-031-07551-3doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

1365780
Sociology of Knowledge and Discourse.

LC Class. No.: BF39.9

Dewey Class. No.: 150.198

Mad Knowledges and User-Led Research
LDR:07954nam a22004095i 4500 001 1083053
003 DE-He213
005 20220912132136.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 221228s2022 sz | s |||| 0|eng d
020 $a 9783031075513 $9 978-3-031-07551-3
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-031-07551-3 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-031-07551-3
050 4 $a BF39.9
072 7 $a JMA $2 bicssc
072 7 $a PSY045000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a JMA $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 150.198 $2 23
100 1 $a Rose, Diana Susan. $e author. $4 aut $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut $3 1388945
245 1 0 $a Mad Knowledges and User-Led Research $h [electronic resource] / $c by Diana Susan Rose.
250 $a 1st ed. 2022.
264 1 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan, $c 2022.
300 $a XXVII, 322 p. 1 illus. $b online resource.
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
347 $a text file $b PDF $2 rda
490 1 $a The Politics of Mental Health and Illness, $x 2731-5274
505 0 $a Part I Setting the Scene -- 1 What Does Madness Articulate? -- Background -- When Madness Begins to Speak What Does ‘It’ Say? -- Mobilising as Speaking Back? -- Non-uniformity -- Who Speaks? -- The Underground -- The Field -- The ‘Mainstreams’ of Survivor Voices—Psychiatry -- The Academy and ‘Psy’ Research -- Speaking Back to Austerity -- Conclusion -- References -- 2 Mental Challenges as Constitutive of Marginalisation? -- Background -- Collectives -- The Clinical Encounter -- Out of the Hospital -- Can Communities be Developed? -- Psychiatric Facilities and Policies as Obstacles to Forming Groups -- Survivors as a ‘Marginalised Community’ -- Counter-Narratives from the Mainstream -- Activism -- What Is to be Done? -- Conclusion -- References -- Part II User Involvement in Research—England as a Case Study -- 3 History of Patient and Public Involvement in England -- Background and Summary -- Language and Representation -- Who Is the Public? -- Can I Apply? -- What Is ‘Meaningful’ Involvement? -- Power -- Changes in Structures -- Research by ‘Lay’ People Outside Official Structures -- Hidden from PPI—Lay Research -- Conclusion -- References -- 4 Research and Practice or What About the Wild? -- The Problems -- Scope -- Impact: The Beginning -- The Question of ‘Impact’ in Involvement Activities -- What Is Meant by the Term ‘Impact’? Two Approaches -- Evidence-Based Medicine (EbM) -- Science and Technology Studies -- Survivor Research and Change -- The Fundamental Difference -- Where Does Madness Sit in the PPI Terrain? -- Back to ‘Impact’ -- What Happens When PPI Happens? -- The Secret of Process -- Process Evaluations -- Going Beyond PPI -- Conclusion -- References -- 5 Working with Others and ‘Coproduction’ -- Background -- Does Everybody Agree? -- Addressing the Field -- Relevant Themes -- Settings, Partners and Mental Health -- Historical Aspects of Coproduction -- Examples of Coproduction? -- The Costs of Coproduction? -- Partners and Allies -- Power Again -- Conclusion -- References -- Part III Foundational Categories and User-Led Research -- 6 Experience as a Foundation of Knowledge-Making: What’s in a Name? -- Background -- Process -- Naming -- Terminology, Identity and ‘Who Counts’ -- Lived Experience -- Disability Under Erasure -- From Soft to Strong and Back Again -- Survivordom -- A Third Way? -- Implications of Names -- Experts and How Should We Talk to Them? -- The Move to Lived Experience -- Activism and Knowledge-Making -- Conclusion -- References -- 7 Experience: What’s in a Foundational Category? -- Background -- Examples from the Literature -- Whose Experiences Does Research Need? -- Mental Health Specifically -- Diversity -- Lived Experience: What Is It? -- Liminal Identities in Liminal Spaces -- Individual and Collective Experience -- Conclusion: Experience in Context -- References -- 8 Specific Projects Led by Service Users -- Background -- Being a User/Survivor Researcher -- Example 1: Consumer/Patient-Centred Systematic Reviews -- Analysis from the Present -- Example 2: Participatory Research -- User-Generated Outcome Measures -- Outcome Measures -- VOICE -- Delving into the Conversations -- Participatory Research and Power -- Ethics -- Community Validation -- Modifying the Model -- Is There a ‘Community’ of Mental Health Service Users/Survivors? -- Conclusion -- References -- Part IV Guiding Principles -- 9 Intersectionality and Mental Life Disturbed -- Background -- Approach -- Women and Madness -- Practice -- Mad Politics -- Feminist Therapy and Structural Violence -- Racialisation and Madness in the West -- The Sharp End of Psychiatry -- A White Survivor Movement -- Problems -- Conclusion -- References -- 10 Conclusion -- Theory -- Conditions for Silencing Madness -- Mental Health and Meaning in the West -- War -- Trauma -- Not All Meaning Is Therapeutic -- If Madness Is Meaningful What Are Its Conditions? -- The Routledge International Handbook of Mad Studies -- The Social Model of Disability -- Psychosocial Disability -- Reasonable Accommodations -- What Is Madness? -- Activism and Last Words -- Joining up Conditions -- Implications for Research -- Activism as Knowledge—A Provocation -- Conclusion -- References -- Index.
520 $a “Diana Rose digs deeply and widely into how knowledge of madness is produced, by whom, in what ways, and to what ends. Her account is both erudite and infused with her own and others' experiences.” —Sue E Estroff, Professor in the Department of Social Medicine, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, USA This book presents a critical examination of the development of user involvement within research, and investigates the issues currently preventing a productive integration of Mad knowledges within research and practice. Drawing on social, linguistic and critical theories, it proposes the conditions needed to address the development of Mad epistemologies. The author’s unique approach deliberately highlights her own positionality and draws on decades of experience as a service recipient, survivor, activist and researcher to illustrate the structural and symbolic barriers faced. Employing concepts including epistemic injustice, individualization, normalization and structural violence, it suggests a radically new way of articulating ‘what’s the matter with us?’ In doing so, the book itself goes some way towards enacting the radical challenge to academic and epistemic hierarchies which, it is argued, will be required to further advance mad knowledges and user-led research. Crucially, it demonstrates how this approach can be both methodologically and conceptually rigorous. This novel work holds important insights for students and scholars across the humanities and social sciences; particularly those working in the areas of critical psychology, disability studies, Mad studies, feminist studies, critical race theory, and Queer theory. Diana Susan Rose retired in 2020 and is now Distinguished Honorary Professor at the Australian National University. She has had two academic careers, interspersed with a period of ‘living in the community’ having been retired from her first position on mental health grounds. She pioneered user-focused research in a London NGO and subsequently worked at King’s College London where she became Professor of User-Led Research in 2013. Her previous works include This is Survivor Research (2009 co-edited with Peter Beresford, Alison Faulkner, Angela Sweeney, and Mary Nettle). .
650 2 4 $a Sociology of Knowledge and Discourse. $3 1365780
650 2 4 $a Psychological Methods. $3 1365979
650 2 4 $a Mental Health. $3 635898
650 2 4 $a Medical Sociology. $3 1105129
650 1 4 $a Critical Psychology. $3 1109764
650 0 $a Knowledge, Sociology of. $3 557225
650 0 $a Psychology—Methodology. $3 1254003
650 0 $a Mental health. $3 564038
650 0 $a Social medicine. $3 558786
650 0 $a Critical psychology. $3 569441
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 593884
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783031075506
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783031075520
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783031075537
830 0 $a The Politics of Mental Health and Illness, $x 2731-5274 $3 1388946
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07551-3
912 $a ZDB-2-BSP
912 $a ZDB-2-SXBP
950 $a Behavioral Science and Psychology (SpringerNature-41168)
950 $a Behavioral Science and Psychology (R0) (SpringerNature-43718)