國立虎尾科技大學 |

Conflicts of Criminal Jurisdiction and Transfer of Proceedings in the EU

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Conflicts of Criminal Jurisdiction and Transfer of Proceedings in the EU/ by Alejandro Hernández López.
作者:	Hernández López, Alejandro.
面頁冊數:	XVIII, 217 p. 1 illus.online resource. :
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
標題:	Private International Law, International and Foreign Law, Comparative Law. -
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15691-5
ISBN:	9783031156915

Conflicts of Criminal Jurisdiction and Transfer of Proceedings in the EU
Hernández López, Alejandro.

Conflicts of Criminal Jurisdiction and Transfer of Proceedings in the EU[electronic resource] /by Alejandro Hernández López. - 1st ed. 2022. - XVIII, 217 p. 1 illus.online resource. - Comparative, European and International Criminal Justice,32524-4566 ;. - Comparative, European and International Criminal Justice,1.

Chapter 1. Conflicts of criminal jurisdiction in the european union -- Conflict of criminal jurisdiction: scope of application -- Grounds for claiming jurisdiction -- Chapter 2. Legal Framework on Conflicts of Criminal Jurisdiction -- Treaties and Primary Law -- Framework Decision 2009/948/JHA -- The role of eurojust in the settlement of conflicts of jurisdiction -- Transposition into national law: the Spanish Example -- Transfer of criminal Proceedings -- Chapter 3. Conflicts of criminal jurisdiction and due process of law -- The ne bis in idem Principle -- Right to be tried by a tribunal previously estblished by law -- Principle of legality -- Rights and safeguards of the suspected or accused -- Allocation of jurisdiction and the victim´s interest -- Negative effects on the effective prosecution of crimes -- Chapter 4. Towards a new model of Settlement of Conflicts: Background and Methodology -- Rationale -- External Background: The Council of Europe Proposal -- EPPo as an (imperfect) example of a vertical mechanism -- Model Proposals: academia background and different approaches -- Chapter 5. De Lege Ferenda Model Proposals on Prevention and Settlement of Conflicts of Criminal Jurisdiction: Horizontal Model -- Horizontal model proposal: general aspects -- Substitution of framework decision 2009/948/JAI -- Regulation on transfer of criminal proceedings -- The Role of eurojust -- Judicial control -- Chapter 6. De Lege Ferenda Model Proposals on Prevention and Settlement of Conflicts of Criminal Jurisdiction: Vertical Model -- Vertical model proposal: general aspects -- Substitution of framework decision 2009/948/JAI -- Regulation On transfer of proceedings -- El papel de Eurojust -- Judicial control.

Framework Decision 2009/948/JHA on the prevention and settlement of conflicts of exercise of jurisdiction in criminal proceedings established an ad hoc procedure for settling conflicts of criminal jurisdiction based on the mutual exchange of information and the establishment of direct consultations between the competent authorities with a view to reaching consensus on an effective solution. However, neither common legally binding criteria for deciding the best jurisdiction nor specific rules for the transfer of proceedings (which can occur after parallel proceedings have been identified) were established in this instrument, or in any other instrument adopted by the EU to date. This book analyses the current EU legal framework on conflicts of jurisdiction and transfer of criminal proceedings, paying special attention to its numerous shortcomings and loopholes from a fundamental rights and due process of law perspective. The book begins with an assessment of the various principles and grounds used by Member States for claiming criminal jurisdiction. Secondly, de lege lata EU procedure on the settlement of conflicts of criminal jurisdiction, as well as its implementation in Spain and Italy, are thoroughly examined. After discussing the main principles and fundamental rights at stake, the author proposes two alternative and original de lege ferenda models for the prevention and settlement of conflicts of criminal jurisdiction and transfer of criminal proceedings, exploring the different possibilities offered by the EU’s primary law.

ISBN: 9783031156915

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-031-15691-5doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

1365811
Private International Law, International and Foreign Law, Comparative Law.

LC Class. No.: KJE7971-8781

Dewey Class. No.: 345.4

Conflicts of Criminal Jurisdiction and Transfer of Proceedings in the EU
LDR:04741nam a22004095i 4500 001 1085693
003 DE-He213
005 20221121123500.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 221228s2022 sz | s |||| 0|eng d
020 $a 9783031156915 $9 978-3-031-15691-5
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-031-15691-5 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-031-15691-5
050 4 $a KJE7971-8781
072 7 $a LBBZ $2 bicssc
072 7 $a LAW051000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a LBBZ $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 345.4 $2 23
100 1 $a Hernández López, Alejandro. $e editor. $1 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9481-3402 $4 aut $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut $3 1354541
245 1 0 $a Conflicts of Criminal Jurisdiction and Transfer of Proceedings in the EU $h [electronic resource] / $c by Alejandro Hernández López.
250 $a 1st ed. 2022.
264 1 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2022.
300 $a XVIII, 217 p. 1 illus. $b online resource.
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
347 $a text file $b PDF $2 rda
490 1 $a Comparative, European and International Criminal Justice, $x 2524-4566 ; $v 3
505 0 $a Chapter 1. Conflicts of criminal jurisdiction in the european union -- Conflict of criminal jurisdiction: scope of application -- Grounds for claiming jurisdiction -- Chapter 2. Legal Framework on Conflicts of Criminal Jurisdiction -- Treaties and Primary Law -- Framework Decision 2009/948/JHA -- The role of eurojust in the settlement of conflicts of jurisdiction -- Transposition into national law: the Spanish Example -- Transfer of criminal Proceedings -- Chapter 3. Conflicts of criminal jurisdiction and due process of law -- The ne bis in idem Principle -- Right to be tried by a tribunal previously estblished by law -- Principle of legality -- Rights and safeguards of the suspected or accused -- Allocation of jurisdiction and the victim´s interest -- Negative effects on the effective prosecution of crimes -- Chapter 4. Towards a new model of Settlement of Conflicts: Background and Methodology -- Rationale -- External Background: The Council of Europe Proposal -- EPPo as an (imperfect) example of a vertical mechanism -- Model Proposals: academia background and different approaches -- Chapter 5. De Lege Ferenda Model Proposals on Prevention and Settlement of Conflicts of Criminal Jurisdiction: Horizontal Model -- Horizontal model proposal: general aspects -- Substitution of framework decision 2009/948/JAI -- Regulation on transfer of criminal proceedings -- The Role of eurojust -- Judicial control -- Chapter 6. De Lege Ferenda Model Proposals on Prevention and Settlement of Conflicts of Criminal Jurisdiction: Vertical Model -- Vertical model proposal: general aspects -- Substitution of framework decision 2009/948/JAI -- Regulation On transfer of proceedings -- El papel de Eurojust -- Judicial control.
520 $a Framework Decision 2009/948/JHA on the prevention and settlement of conflicts of exercise of jurisdiction in criminal proceedings established an ad hoc procedure for settling conflicts of criminal jurisdiction based on the mutual exchange of information and the establishment of direct consultations between the competent authorities with a view to reaching consensus on an effective solution. However, neither common legally binding criteria for deciding the best jurisdiction nor specific rules for the transfer of proceedings (which can occur after parallel proceedings have been identified) were established in this instrument, or in any other instrument adopted by the EU to date. This book analyses the current EU legal framework on conflicts of jurisdiction and transfer of criminal proceedings, paying special attention to its numerous shortcomings and loopholes from a fundamental rights and due process of law perspective. The book begins with an assessment of the various principles and grounds used by Member States for claiming criminal jurisdiction. Secondly, de lege lata EU procedure on the settlement of conflicts of criminal jurisdiction, as well as its implementation in Spain and Italy, are thoroughly examined. After discussing the main principles and fundamental rights at stake, the author proposes two alternative and original de lege ferenda models for the prevention and settlement of conflicts of criminal jurisdiction and transfer of criminal proceedings, exploring the different possibilities offered by the EU’s primary law.
650 2 4 $a Private International Law, International and Foreign Law, Comparative Law. $3 1365811
650 2 4 $a Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure Law. $3 1209898
650 1 4 $a European Criminal Law. $3 1319226
650 0 $a Comparative law. $3 560198
650 0 $a International law. $3 557047
650 0 $a Conflict of laws. $3 560163
650 0 $a Private international law. $3 1202562
650 0 $a Criminal law. $3 569598
650 0 $a Criminal law—International unification. $3 1390296
650 0 $a Law—Europe. $3 1254279
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 593884
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783031156908
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783031156922
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783031156939
830 0 $a Comparative, European and International Criminal Justice, $x 2524-4558 ; $v 1 $3 1303394
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15691-5
912 $a ZDB-2-LCR
912 $a ZDB-2-SXLC
950 $a Law and Criminology (SpringerNature-41177)
950 $a Law and Criminology (R0) (SpringerNature-43727)