國立虎尾科技大學 |

The Logic of Responsibility Voids

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Logic of Responsibility Voids/ by Hein Duijf.
作者:	Duijf, Hein.
面頁冊數:	XI, 189 p. 1 illus.online resource. :
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
標題:	Ethics. -
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92655-7
ISBN:	9783030926557

The Logic of Responsibility Voids
Duijf, Hein.

The Logic of Responsibility Voids[electronic resource] /by Hein Duijf. - 1st ed. 2022. - XI, 189 p. 1 illus.online resource. - Synthese Library, Studies in Epistemology, Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science,4562542-8292 ;. - Synthese Library, Studies in Epistemology, Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science,359.

1. Introduction: The Problem of Responsibility Voids -- 2. Games and Agency -- 3. Collective Obligations, Group Plans, and Individual Actions -- 4. Guilty Minds and Collective Know-how -- 5. Joint Action, Participatory Intentions, and Team Reasoning -- 6. Practical Reasoning and Cooperation -- 7. Conclusion: The Conditions for Responsibility Voids and Gaps.

This book focuses on the problem of responsibility voids: these are cases where responsibility for a morally undesirable outcome cannot be attributed to any of the involved agents. Responsibility voids are thought to occur in collective decision-making and in the context of artificial intelligent systems. In these cases, philosophers worry that there is a shortfall of moral responsibility. In particular, such voids are often assumed to justify a notion of collective responsibility that cannot be reduced to individual responsibility. One of the aims of the book is to study how collective responsibility and joint action relate to individual responsibility and individual actions. The book offers a unifying framework for modelling moral responsibility by drawing from modal logic and game theory. The book investigates the possibility and scope of the problem of responsibility voids. One of its characteristics is its pluralistic perspective on moral responsibility: in contrast to giving a unique and all-encompassing definition of it, the book makes progress by spelling out and modelling several conceptions of moral responsibility. One of the appealing features of the book is that a relatively small range of models is used to investigate a variety of conceptions of moral responsibility. The unifying framework can thus be used to characterize the conditions under which responsibility voids are ruled out. .

ISBN: 9783030926557

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-030-92655-7doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

555769
Ethics.

LC Class. No.: BJ1-1725

Dewey Class. No.: 170

The Logic of Responsibility Voids
LDR:03210nam a22004095i 4500 001 1089720
003 DE-He213
005 20220307182527.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 221228s2022 sz | s |||| 0|eng d
020 $a 9783030926557 $9 978-3-030-92655-7
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-030-92655-7 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-030-92655-7
050 4 $a BJ1-1725
072 7 $a HPQ $2 bicssc
072 7 $a PHI005000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a QDTQ $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 170 $2 23
100 1 $a Duijf, Hein. $e author. $4 aut $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut $3 1397018
245 1 4 $a The Logic of Responsibility Voids $h [electronic resource] / $c by Hein Duijf.
250 $a 1st ed. 2022.
264 1 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2022.
300 $a XI, 189 p. 1 illus. $b online resource.
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
347 $a text file $b PDF $2 rda
490 1 $a Synthese Library, Studies in Epistemology, Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science, $x 2542-8292 ; $v 456
505 0 $a 1. Introduction: The Problem of Responsibility Voids -- 2. Games and Agency -- 3. Collective Obligations, Group Plans, and Individual Actions -- 4. Guilty Minds and Collective Know-how -- 5. Joint Action, Participatory Intentions, and Team Reasoning -- 6. Practical Reasoning and Cooperation -- 7. Conclusion: The Conditions for Responsibility Voids and Gaps.
520 $a This book focuses on the problem of responsibility voids: these are cases where responsibility for a morally undesirable outcome cannot be attributed to any of the involved agents. Responsibility voids are thought to occur in collective decision-making and in the context of artificial intelligent systems. In these cases, philosophers worry that there is a shortfall of moral responsibility. In particular, such voids are often assumed to justify a notion of collective responsibility that cannot be reduced to individual responsibility. One of the aims of the book is to study how collective responsibility and joint action relate to individual responsibility and individual actions. The book offers a unifying framework for modelling moral responsibility by drawing from modal logic and game theory. The book investigates the possibility and scope of the problem of responsibility voids. One of its characteristics is its pluralistic perspective on moral responsibility: in contrast to giving a unique and all-encompassing definition of it, the book makes progress by spelling out and modelling several conceptions of moral responsibility. One of the appealing features of the book is that a relatively small range of models is used to investigate a variety of conceptions of moral responsibility. The unifying framework can thus be used to characterize the conditions under which responsibility voids are ruled out. .
650 0 $a Ethics. $3 555769
650 0 $a Logic. $3 558909
650 0 $a Microeconomics. $3 565210
650 0 $a Computer simulation. $3 560190
650 1 4 $a Moral Philosophy and Applied Ethics. $3 1365939
650 2 4 $a Computer Modelling. $3 1365730
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 593884
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783030926540
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783030926564
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783030926571
830 0 $a Synthese Library, Studies in Epistemology, Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science, $x 0166-6991 ; $v 359 $3 1257256
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92655-7
912 $a ZDB-2-REP
912 $a ZDB-2-SXPR
950 $a Religion and Philosophy (SpringerNature-41175)
950 $a Philosophy and Religion (R0) (SpringerNature-43725)