國立虎尾科技大學 |

Conscientious Objection = Dissent and Democracy in a Common Law Context /

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Conscientious Objection/ by Kerry O'Halloran.
其他題名:	Dissent and Democracy in a Common Law Context /
作者:	O'Halloran, Kerry.
面頁冊數:	XXIII, 569 p.online resource. :
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
標題:	Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History. -
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97648-4
ISBN:	9783030976484

Conscientious Objection = Dissent and Democracy in a Common Law Context /
O'Halloran, Kerry.

Conscientious ObjectionDissent and Democracy in a Common Law Context /[electronic resource] :by Kerry O'Halloran. - 1st ed. 2022. - XXIII, 569 p.online resource. - Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice,982214-9902 ;. - Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice,42.

Book Introduction -- Part 1: Citizen And State -- Intro to Part 1 -- Conscience and Conscientiousness: Principles, Concepts and Parameters -- Dissent & the Common Law Nations: Pluralism and Objecting Conscientiously -- Part 2: Conscientious Objection and Contemporary International Law -- Intro to Part 2 -- The International Legal Framework for Conscientious Objection and Themes for Comparative Jurisdictional Analysis -- Part 3: Jurisdictional Survey -- Intro to Part 3 -- England and Wales -- Ireland -- U.S.A. -- Canada -- Australia -- New Zealand.-Part 4: Equality, Exemption And Democracy -- Intro to Part 4: Themes of Jurisdictional Commonality and Difference -- A Democratic and Diverse Society: Balancing Equality and Exemption -- Conclusion.

This book traces, assesses and compares the history of conscientious objection – in the cultural context of six common law nations – from refusal of military service and a range of similar moral dilemmas, to objecting to abortion, to the current social polarisation surrounding vaccination hesitancy in the COVID-19 pandemic. It considers the impact of this form of dissent in relation to social movements like Black Lives Matter, social activists such as Gandhi, and whistle blowers like Daniel Ellsberg. It reflects on the relationships between the sacred and the secular, the state and the citizen, in order to better understand the responsibilities of citizenship in our increasingly secular societies. It analyses what defines the conscientiousness of an objection from both legal and ethical standpoints. It examines what constitutes a matter of conscience, why this should justify exemption from civic duties and why this form of dissent has such a time-honoured status. It explores the increased reliance on “grounds of religion, belief or conscience” as providing justification for excusing some citizens from complying with certain responsibilities – mandated by equality and non-discrimination legislation – that are binding for all others. By conducting a comparative evaluation of national law and judicial rulings on a fixed agenda of issues, this book identifies key jurisdictional differences concerning conscientious objection. In so doing, it highlights the importance of cultural context and constructs a jurisdiction-specific overview of legislation, policies and case law. By tracking policy developments and highlighting crucial judicial rulings – particularly in the US – it provides insights into the probable future direction of developments in national law relating to conscientious objection. Lastly, the book draws attention to some of the potential consequences of manifesting dissent by opting out of performing public services – e.g. the possible local breakdown of specific service availability (e.g. abortion, officiating at same-sex marriages, and immunisation); prompting population movements as established democratic civil rights are locally negated (reproductive rights, LGBT rights, right to health protection); fragmenting society into a geographic patchwork of regions in which some citizens are branded as conservative/reactionary and others as progressive; and fuelling the culture wars – with profound implications for a coherent democratic society.

ISBN: 9783030976484

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-030-97648-4doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

883676
Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History.

LC Class. No.: K3236-3268.5

Dewey Class. No.: 341.48

Conscientious Objection = Dissent and Democracy in a Common Law Context /
LDR:04704nam a22004095i 4500 001 1091249
003 DE-He213
005 20220325133308.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 221228s2022 sz | s |||| 0|eng d
020 $a 9783030976484 $9 978-3-030-97648-4
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-030-97648-4 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-030-97648-4
050 4 $a K3236-3268.5
072 7 $a JPVH $2 bicssc
072 7 $a LAW051000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a JPVH $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 341.48 $2 23
100 1 $a O'Halloran, Kerry. $4 aut $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut $3 681188
245 1 0 $a Conscientious Objection $h [electronic resource] : $b Dissent and Democracy in a Common Law Context / $c by Kerry O'Halloran.
250 $a 1st ed. 2022.
264 1 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2022.
300 $a XXIII, 569 p. $b online resource.
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
347 $a text file $b PDF $2 rda
490 1 $a Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, $x 2214-9902 ; $v 98
505 0 $a Book Introduction -- Part 1: Citizen And State -- Intro to Part 1 -- Conscience and Conscientiousness: Principles, Concepts and Parameters -- Dissent & the Common Law Nations: Pluralism and Objecting Conscientiously -- Part 2: Conscientious Objection and Contemporary International Law -- Intro to Part 2 -- The International Legal Framework for Conscientious Objection and Themes for Comparative Jurisdictional Analysis -- Part 3: Jurisdictional Survey -- Intro to Part 3 -- England and Wales -- Ireland -- U.S.A. -- Canada -- Australia -- New Zealand.-Part 4: Equality, Exemption And Democracy -- Intro to Part 4: Themes of Jurisdictional Commonality and Difference -- A Democratic and Diverse Society: Balancing Equality and Exemption -- Conclusion.
520 $a This book traces, assesses and compares the history of conscientious objection – in the cultural context of six common law nations – from refusal of military service and a range of similar moral dilemmas, to objecting to abortion, to the current social polarisation surrounding vaccination hesitancy in the COVID-19 pandemic. It considers the impact of this form of dissent in relation to social movements like Black Lives Matter, social activists such as Gandhi, and whistle blowers like Daniel Ellsberg. It reflects on the relationships between the sacred and the secular, the state and the citizen, in order to better understand the responsibilities of citizenship in our increasingly secular societies. It analyses what defines the conscientiousness of an objection from both legal and ethical standpoints. It examines what constitutes a matter of conscience, why this should justify exemption from civic duties and why this form of dissent has such a time-honoured status. It explores the increased reliance on “grounds of religion, belief or conscience” as providing justification for excusing some citizens from complying with certain responsibilities – mandated by equality and non-discrimination legislation – that are binding for all others. By conducting a comparative evaluation of national law and judicial rulings on a fixed agenda of issues, this book identifies key jurisdictional differences concerning conscientious objection. In so doing, it highlights the importance of cultural context and constructs a jurisdiction-specific overview of legislation, policies and case law. By tracking policy developments and highlighting crucial judicial rulings – particularly in the US – it provides insights into the probable future direction of developments in national law relating to conscientious objection. Lastly, the book draws attention to some of the potential consequences of manifesting dissent by opting out of performing public services – e.g. the possible local breakdown of specific service availability (e.g. abortion, officiating at same-sex marriages, and immunisation); prompting population movements as established democratic civil rights are locally negated (reproductive rights, LGBT rights, right to health protection); fragmenting society into a geographic patchwork of regions in which some citizens are branded as conservative/reactionary and others as progressive; and fuelling the culture wars – with profound implications for a coherent democratic society.
650 2 4 $a Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History. $3 883676
650 2 4 $a Private International Law, International and Foreign Law, Comparative Law. $3 1365811
650 1 4 $a Human Rights. $3 883254
650 0 $a Law—History. $3 1269221
650 0 $a Law—Philosophy. $3 1253604
650 0 $a Comparative law. $3 560198
650 0 $a International law. $3 557047
650 0 $a Conflict of laws. $3 560163
650 0 $a Private international law. $3 1202562
650 0 $a Human rights. $3 554782
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 593884
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783030976477
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783030976491
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783030976507
830 0 $a Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, $x 1534-6781 ; $v 42 $3 1253974
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97648-4
912 $a ZDB-2-LCR
912 $a ZDB-2-SXLC
950 $a Law and Criminology (SpringerNature-41177)
950 $a Law and Criminology (R0) (SpringerNature-43727)