國立虎尾科技大學 |

Philosophy and Neuroscience = A Methodological Analysis /

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Philosophy and Neuroscience/ by Steven S. Gouveia.
其他題名:	A Methodological Analysis /
作者:	Gouveia, Steven S.
面頁冊數:	XIV, 313 p. 11 illus., 8 illus. in color.online resource. :
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
標題:	Cognitive Neuroscience. -
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95369-0
ISBN:	9783030953690

Philosophy and Neuroscience = A Methodological Analysis /
Gouveia, Steven S.

Philosophy and NeuroscienceA Methodological Analysis /[electronic resource] :by Steven S. Gouveia. - 1st ed. 2022. - XIV, 313 p. 11 illus., 8 illus. in color.online resource. - New Directions in Philosophy and Cognitive Science. - New Directions in Philosophy and Cognitive Science.

Chapter 1 - Methodological Problem in Philosophy and Neuroscience -- Chapter 2 - Methodological Isolationism -- Chapter 3 - Reductive Neurophilosophy -- Chapter 4 - Neurophenomenology -- Chapter 5 - Non-Reductive Neurophilosophy -- Chapter 6 - Qualia and Information in Philosophy and Neuroscience -- Conclusion.

This book explores the methodological strategies for linking philosophy and neuroscience concerning the study of the conscious brain. The author focuses on four distinct methods for relating these two academic disciplines: isolationist, reductionist, neurophenomenological, and non-reductionist. After analyzing the pros and cons of these approaches, Steven S. Gouveia applies them to the concept of Qualia and Information to understand how the metaphilosophical assumptions of each approach influence the definitions of those specific concepts. Gouveia argues for an approach that conceives the interdisciplinarity of both philosophy and neuroscience, in a particular and sound methodology, offering empirical examples of the explanatory power of this methodology over the others. Additionally, he shows how the metaphilosophical assumptions of each methodology—usually taken by researchers implicitly and unconsciously—influence their own approach to the methodological problem. Steven S. Gouveia is a Post Doctoral Research Fellow at the Mind, Brain Imaging and Neuroethics Unit of the Royal Institute of Mental Health, University of Ottawa, Canada.

ISBN: 9783030953690

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-030-95369-0doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

1237796
Cognitive Neuroscience.

LC Class. No.: BD418-418.84

Dewey Class. No.: 128.2

Philosophy and Neuroscience = A Methodological Analysis /
LDR:02909nam a22004095i 4500 001 1092647
003 DE-He213
005 20220411065549.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 221228s2022 sz | s |||| 0|eng d
020 $a 9783030953690 $9 978-3-030-95369-0
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-030-95369-0 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-030-95369-0
050 4 $a BD418-418.84
072 7 $a HPM $2 bicssc
072 7 $a PHI015000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a QDTM $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 128.2 $2 23
100 1 $a Gouveia, Steven S. $e author. $4 aut $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut $3 1400447
245 1 0 $a Philosophy and Neuroscience $h [electronic resource] : $b A Methodological Analysis / $c by Steven S. Gouveia.
250 $a 1st ed. 2022.
264 1 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan, $c 2022.
300 $a XIV, 313 p. 11 illus., 8 illus. in color. $b online resource.
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
347 $a text file $b PDF $2 rda
490 1 $a New Directions in Philosophy and Cognitive Science
505 0 $a Chapter 1 - Methodological Problem in Philosophy and Neuroscience -- Chapter 2 - Methodological Isolationism -- Chapter 3 - Reductive Neurophilosophy -- Chapter 4 - Neurophenomenology -- Chapter 5 - Non-Reductive Neurophilosophy -- Chapter 6 - Qualia and Information in Philosophy and Neuroscience -- Conclusion.
520 $a This book explores the methodological strategies for linking philosophy and neuroscience concerning the study of the conscious brain. The author focuses on four distinct methods for relating these two academic disciplines: isolationist, reductionist, neurophenomenological, and non-reductionist. After analyzing the pros and cons of these approaches, Steven S. Gouveia applies them to the concept of Qualia and Information to understand how the metaphilosophical assumptions of each approach influence the definitions of those specific concepts. Gouveia argues for an approach that conceives the interdisciplinarity of both philosophy and neuroscience, in a particular and sound methodology, offering empirical examples of the explanatory power of this methodology over the others. Additionally, he shows how the metaphilosophical assumptions of each methodology—usually taken by researchers implicitly and unconsciously—influence their own approach to the methodological problem. Steven S. Gouveia is a Post Doctoral Research Fellow at the Mind, Brain Imaging and Neuroethics Unit of the Royal Institute of Mental Health, University of Ottawa, Canada.
650 2 4 $a Cognitive Neuroscience. $3 1237796
650 2 4 $a Epistemology. $3 671538
650 1 4 $a Philosophy of Mind. $3 668203
650 0 $a Cognitive neuroscience. $3 557002
650 0 $a Knowledge, Theory of. $3 554789
650 0 $a Philosophy of mind. $3 555804
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 593884
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783030953683
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783030953706
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783030953713
830 0 $a New Directions in Philosophy and Cognitive Science $3 1259277
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95369-0
912 $a ZDB-2-REP
912 $a ZDB-2-SXPR
950 $a Religion and Philosophy (SpringerNature-41175)
950 $a Philosophy and Religion (R0) (SpringerNature-43725)