國立虎尾科技大學 |

How Philosophers Argue = An Adversarial Collaboration on the Russell--Copleston Debate /

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	How Philosophers Argue/ by Fernando Leal, Hubert Marraud.
Reminder of title:	An Adversarial Collaboration on the Russell--Copleston Debate /
Author:	Leal, Fernando.
other author:	Marraud, Hubert.
Description:	XIII, 472 p. 248 illus., 4 illus. in color.online resource. :
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
Subject:	Philosophy—History. -
Online resource:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85368-6
ISBN:	9783030853686

How Philosophers Argue = An Adversarial Collaboration on the Russell--Copleston Debate /
Leal, Fernando.

How Philosophers ArgueAn Adversarial Collaboration on the Russell--Copleston Debate /[electronic resource] :by Fernando Leal, Hubert Marraud. - 1st ed. 2022. - XIII, 472 p. 248 illus., 4 illus. in color.online resource. - Argumentation Library,412215-1907 ;. - Argumentation Library,28.

Preface -- Introduction -- Chapter 1. Argumentation Theories -- Part I: A P-Theoretical Analysis of the Debate, by Fernando Leal -- Chapter 2. Description of the Method Followed -- Chapter 3. Analysis of Segment I: Start of the Debate -- Chapter 4. Analysis of Segment II: Discussion of Copleston’s Metaphysical Argument -- Chapter 5. Analysis of Segment III: Discussion of Copleston’s Religious Argument -- Chapter 6. Analysis of Segment IV: Discussion of Copleston’s Moral Argument -- Chapter 7. Analysis of Segment V: Summing-Up of the Arguments -- Part II: An E-Theoretical Analysis of the Debate, by Hubert Marraud -- Chapter 8. Argument Dialectic -- Chapter 9. Argumentation Structures and Operations -- Chapter 10. Counterarguments -- Chapter 11. Co-oriented Reasons and Modifiers -- Chapter 12. Intertwined Structures -- Chapter 13. An Argument-Dialectical Analysis of the Russell-Copleston Debate -- Chapter 14. An Exercise in Adversarial Collaboration -- Appendix: Text of the Russell-Copleston Debate.

This volume presents a double argumentative analysis of the debate between Bertrand Russell and Frederick Copleston on the existence of God. It includes an introduction justifying the choice of text and describing the historical and philosophical background of the debate. It also provides a transcript of the debate, based in part on the original recording. The argumentative analyses occupy Parts I and II of the book. In Part I the argumentative process is analysed by means of the ideal model of critical discussion, the workhorse of pragma-dialectics. Part I shows how the two parties go through the four stages of a critical discussion. It highlights the questions raised over and beyond the presiding question of whether God exists and examines almost a hundred questions that are raised. Many are left in the air, whereas a few others give rise to sundry sub-discussions or meta-dialogues. In Part II the theoretical framework of argument dialectic is put to work: argument structures are identified by means of punctuation marks, argumentative connectors and operators, allowing to see the argumentative exchange as the collaborative construction of a macro-argument. Such a macro-argument is both a joint product of the arguers and a complex structure representing the dialectical relationships between the individual arguments combined in it. Finally, the complementarity of the two approaches is addressed. Thus the book can be described as an exercise in adversarial collaboration.

ISBN: 9783030853686

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-030-85368-6doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

1365880
Philosophy—History.

LC Class. No.: B1-5802

Dewey Class. No.: 109

How Philosophers Argue = An Adversarial Collaboration on the Russell--Copleston Debate /
LDR:03969nam a22004095i 4500 001 1094529
003 DE-He213
005 20220221071818.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 221228s2022 sz | s |||| 0|eng d
020 $a 9783030853686 $9 978-3-030-85368-6
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-030-85368-6 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-030-85368-6
050 4 $a B1-5802
072 7 $a HPC $2 bicssc
072 7 $a PHI009000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a QDH $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 109 $2 23
100 1 $a Leal, Fernando. $e author. $4 aut $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut $3 1402671
245 1 0 $a How Philosophers Argue $h [electronic resource] : $b An Adversarial Collaboration on the Russell--Copleston Debate / $c by Fernando Leal, Hubert Marraud.
250 $a 1st ed. 2022.
264 1 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2022.
300 $a XIII, 472 p. 248 illus., 4 illus. in color. $b online resource.
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
347 $a text file $b PDF $2 rda
490 1 $a Argumentation Library, $x 2215-1907 ; $v 41
505 0 $a Preface -- Introduction -- Chapter 1. Argumentation Theories -- Part I: A P-Theoretical Analysis of the Debate, by Fernando Leal -- Chapter 2. Description of the Method Followed -- Chapter 3. Analysis of Segment I: Start of the Debate -- Chapter 4. Analysis of Segment II: Discussion of Copleston’s Metaphysical Argument -- Chapter 5. Analysis of Segment III: Discussion of Copleston’s Religious Argument -- Chapter 6. Analysis of Segment IV: Discussion of Copleston’s Moral Argument -- Chapter 7. Analysis of Segment V: Summing-Up of the Arguments -- Part II: An E-Theoretical Analysis of the Debate, by Hubert Marraud -- Chapter 8. Argument Dialectic -- Chapter 9. Argumentation Structures and Operations -- Chapter 10. Counterarguments -- Chapter 11. Co-oriented Reasons and Modifiers -- Chapter 12. Intertwined Structures -- Chapter 13. An Argument-Dialectical Analysis of the Russell-Copleston Debate -- Chapter 14. An Exercise in Adversarial Collaboration -- Appendix: Text of the Russell-Copleston Debate.
520 $a This volume presents a double argumentative analysis of the debate between Bertrand Russell and Frederick Copleston on the existence of God. It includes an introduction justifying the choice of text and describing the historical and philosophical background of the debate. It also provides a transcript of the debate, based in part on the original recording. The argumentative analyses occupy Parts I and II of the book. In Part I the argumentative process is analysed by means of the ideal model of critical discussion, the workhorse of pragma-dialectics. Part I shows how the two parties go through the four stages of a critical discussion. It highlights the questions raised over and beyond the presiding question of whether God exists and examines almost a hundred questions that are raised. Many are left in the air, whereas a few others give rise to sundry sub-discussions or meta-dialogues. In Part II the theoretical framework of argument dialectic is put to work: argument structures are identified by means of punctuation marks, argumentative connectors and operators, allowing to see the argumentative exchange as the collaborative construction of a macro-argument. Such a macro-argument is both a joint product of the arguers and a complex structure representing the dialectical relationships between the individual arguments combined in it. Finally, the complementarity of the two approaches is addressed. Thus the book can be described as an exercise in adversarial collaboration.
650 0 $a Philosophy—History. $3 1365880
650 1 4 $a History of Philosophy. $3 671574
700 1 $a Marraud, Hubert. $e author. $4 aut $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut $3 1402672
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 593884
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783030853679
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783030853693
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783030853709
830 0 $a Argumentation Library, $x 1566-7650 ; $v 28 $3 1254670
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85368-6
912 $a ZDB-2-REP
912 $a ZDB-2-SXPR
950 $a Religion and Philosophy (SpringerNature-41175)
950 $a Philosophy and Religion (R0) (SpringerNature-43725)