語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Logic Without Gaps or Gluts = How to Solve the Paradoxes Without Sacrificing Classical Logic /
紀錄類型:
書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Logic Without Gaps or Gluts/ by Benjamin Alan Burgis.
其他題名:
How to Solve the Paradoxes Without Sacrificing Classical Logic /
作者:
Burgis, Benjamin Alan.
面頁冊數:
VII, 189 p. 1 illus.online resource. :
Contained By:
Springer Nature eBook
標題:
Analytic Philosophy. -
電子資源:
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94624-1
ISBN:
9783030946241
Logic Without Gaps or Gluts = How to Solve the Paradoxes Without Sacrificing Classical Logic /
Burgis, Benjamin Alan.
Logic Without Gaps or Gluts
How to Solve the Paradoxes Without Sacrificing Classical Logic /[electronic resource] :by Benjamin Alan Burgis. - 1st ed. 2022. - VII, 189 p. 1 illus.online resource. - Synthese Library, Studies in Epistemology, Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science,4582542-8292 ;. - Synthese Library, Studies in Epistemology, Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science,359.
Chapter 1. Logic and the Liar Paradox -- Chapter 2. Graham Priest and Dialetheism -- Chapter 3. How to Solve Priest’s Paradoxes Without Sacrificing Classical Logic -- Chapter 4. Dialetheism and the Laws of Logic -- Chapter 5. Dialetheism, Rejection, and Curry’s Paradox -- Chapter 6. Dialetheism, Rejection, and Probability Theory -- Chapter 7. Hartry Field and Paracompleteness -- Chapter 8. How to Solve the Liar Paradox Without Sacrificing Classical Logic -- Index.
This book offers a defense against non-classical approaches to the paradoxes. The author argues that, despite appearances, the paradoxes give no reason at all to reject classical logic. In fact, he believes classical solutions fare better than non-classical ones with respect to key tests like Curry’s Paradox, a Liar-like paradox that dialetheists are forced to solve in a way totally disjoint from their solution to the Liar. Graham Priest’s In Contradiction was the first major work that advocated the use of non-classical approaches. Since then, these views have moved into the philosophical mainstream. Much of this movement is fueled by a widespread sense that these logically heterodox solutions get to the real nub of the issue. They lack the ad hoc feel of many other solutions to the paradoxes. The author believes that it's long past time for a response to these attacks against classical orthodoxy. He presents a non-logically-revisionary solution to the paradoxes. This title offers a literal way of cashing out the disquotation metaphor. While the details of the view are novel, the idea has a pre-history in the relevant literature. The author examines objections in detail. He rejects each in turn and concludes by comparing the virtues of his logically orthodox approach with those of the paraconsistent and paracomplete competition.
ISBN: 9783030946241
Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-030-94624-1doiSubjects--Topical Terms:
1104995
Analytic Philosophy.
LC Class. No.: BC1-199
Dewey Class. No.: 160
Logic Without Gaps or Gluts = How to Solve the Paradoxes Without Sacrificing Classical Logic /
LDR
:03326nam a22004095i 4500
001
1094981
003
DE-He213
005
20220225183639.0
007
cr nn 008mamaa
008
221228s2022 sz | s |||| 0|eng d
020
$a
9783030946241
$9
978-3-030-94624-1
024
7
$a
10.1007/978-3-030-94624-1
$2
doi
035
$a
978-3-030-94624-1
050
4
$a
BC1-199
072
7
$a
HPL
$2
bicssc
072
7
$a
PHI011000
$2
bisacsh
072
7
$a
QDTL
$2
thema
082
0 4
$a
160
$2
23
100
1
$a
Burgis, Benjamin Alan.
$e
author.
$4
aut
$4
http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
$3
1403172
245
1 0
$a
Logic Without Gaps or Gluts
$h
[electronic resource] :
$b
How to Solve the Paradoxes Without Sacrificing Classical Logic /
$c
by Benjamin Alan Burgis.
250
$a
1st ed. 2022.
264
1
$a
Cham :
$b
Springer International Publishing :
$b
Imprint: Springer,
$c
2022.
300
$a
VII, 189 p. 1 illus.
$b
online resource.
336
$a
text
$b
txt
$2
rdacontent
337
$a
computer
$b
c
$2
rdamedia
338
$a
online resource
$b
cr
$2
rdacarrier
347
$a
text file
$b
PDF
$2
rda
490
1
$a
Synthese Library, Studies in Epistemology, Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science,
$x
2542-8292 ;
$v
458
505
0
$a
Chapter 1. Logic and the Liar Paradox -- Chapter 2. Graham Priest and Dialetheism -- Chapter 3. How to Solve Priest’s Paradoxes Without Sacrificing Classical Logic -- Chapter 4. Dialetheism and the Laws of Logic -- Chapter 5. Dialetheism, Rejection, and Curry’s Paradox -- Chapter 6. Dialetheism, Rejection, and Probability Theory -- Chapter 7. Hartry Field and Paracompleteness -- Chapter 8. How to Solve the Liar Paradox Without Sacrificing Classical Logic -- Index.
520
$a
This book offers a defense against non-classical approaches to the paradoxes. The author argues that, despite appearances, the paradoxes give no reason at all to reject classical logic. In fact, he believes classical solutions fare better than non-classical ones with respect to key tests like Curry’s Paradox, a Liar-like paradox that dialetheists are forced to solve in a way totally disjoint from their solution to the Liar. Graham Priest’s In Contradiction was the first major work that advocated the use of non-classical approaches. Since then, these views have moved into the philosophical mainstream. Much of this movement is fueled by a widespread sense that these logically heterodox solutions get to the real nub of the issue. They lack the ad hoc feel of many other solutions to the paradoxes. The author believes that it's long past time for a response to these attacks against classical orthodoxy. He presents a non-logically-revisionary solution to the paradoxes. This title offers a literal way of cashing out the disquotation metaphor. While the details of the view are novel, the idea has a pre-history in the relevant literature. The author examines objections in detail. He rejects each in turn and concludes by comparing the virtues of his logically orthodox approach with those of the paraconsistent and paracomplete competition.
650
2 4
$a
Analytic Philosophy.
$3
1104995
650
2 4
$a
Mathematical Logic and Foundations.
$3
669393
650
0
$a
Biotechnology.
$3
554955
650
0
$a
Analysis (Philosophy).
$3
1254094
650
0
$a
Mathematical logic.
$2
bicssc
$3
810627
650
0
$a
Logic.
$3
558909
710
2
$a
SpringerLink (Online service)
$3
593884
773
0
$t
Springer Nature eBook
776
0 8
$i
Printed edition:
$z
9783030946234
776
0 8
$i
Printed edition:
$z
9783030946258
776
0 8
$i
Printed edition:
$z
9783030946265
830
0
$a
Synthese Library, Studies in Epistemology, Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science,
$x
0166-6991 ;
$v
359
$3
1257256
856
4 0
$u
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94624-1
912
$a
ZDB-2-REP
912
$a
ZDB-2-SXPR
950
$a
Religion and Philosophy (SpringerNature-41175)
950
$a
Philosophy and Religion (R0) (SpringerNature-43725)
筆 0 讀者評論
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館別
處理中
...
變更密碼[密碼必須為2種組合(英文和數字)及長度為10碼以上]
登入