國立虎尾科技大學 |

Acute Effects of Lacrosse Ball Self-Myofascial Release and Static Stretching on Hamstring Flexibility.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Acute Effects of Lacrosse Ball Self-Myofascial Release and Static Stretching on Hamstring Flexibility./
作者:	Wynn, Kenneth L., Jr.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2022,
面頁冊數:	86 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-02, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International84-02B.
標題:	Kinesiology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29260260
ISBN:	9798841746805

Acute Effects of Lacrosse Ball Self-Myofascial Release and Static Stretching on Hamstring Flexibility.
Wynn, Kenneth L., Jr.

Acute Effects of Lacrosse Ball Self-Myofascial Release and Static Stretching on Hamstring Flexibility. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2022 - 86 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-02, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Tennessee Technological University, 2022.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

This study used a three-group crossover experimental design to examine the acute effects of static stretching and a lacrosse ball self-myofascial release (SMR) on hamstring flexibility. The three testing groups were: warm-up followed by static stretching (WS), warm-up followed by lacrosse ball SMR (WL), and warm-up only (WU). Data were collected during the Spring of 2022, from 31 college students who participated and received all three treatments, with one week in between each treatment. The researcher also examined the order of treatment presentation to determine if there were any carryover effects from previous treatments.A two-way mixed ANOVA was conducted to examine statistical differences between the flexibility scores for the three groups. The main effect of treatment on hamstring flexibility was statistically significant between groups [F(2, 30) = 16.19, p < .001, ηp2 = .366], indicating that there was a statistical difference between at least one of the treatment groups. Post hoc multiple comparisons tests determined that there was a significant difference between the WU and WS groups, p < .001, 95% CI = [-3.38, -1.10], no significant differences between the WU and WL groups, p < .245, 95% CI = [-1.74, .30], and a significant difference between the WS and WL groups, p < .001, 95% CI = [.62, 2.43].Results indicated that the WS treatment (M = 28.984) resulted in significantly larger acute hamstring flexibility measurements than both the WL (M = 27.452) and WU (M = 26.774) treatments, but that there were no statistically significant differences between the WL and WU groups. Results also indicated that the order of treatment presentation did not impact the treatment results.

ISBN: 9798841746805Subjects--Topical Terms:

721210
Kinesiology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Flexibility

Acute Effects of Lacrosse Ball Self-Myofascial Release and Static Stretching on Hamstring Flexibility.
LDR:03026nam a2200421 4500 001 1104642
005 20230619080109.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 230907s2022 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798841746805
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI29260260
035 $a AAI29260260
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Wynn, Kenneth L., Jr. $3 1413545
245 1 0 $a Acute Effects of Lacrosse Ball Self-Myofascial Release and Static Stretching on Hamstring Flexibility.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2022
300 $a 86 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-02, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Killman, Christy.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Tennessee Technological University, 2022.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a This study used a three-group crossover experimental design to examine the acute effects of static stretching and a lacrosse ball self-myofascial release (SMR) on hamstring flexibility. The three testing groups were: warm-up followed by static stretching (WS), warm-up followed by lacrosse ball SMR (WL), and warm-up only (WU). Data were collected during the Spring of 2022, from 31 college students who participated and received all three treatments, with one week in between each treatment. The researcher also examined the order of treatment presentation to determine if there were any carryover effects from previous treatments.A two-way mixed ANOVA was conducted to examine statistical differences between the flexibility scores for the three groups. The main effect of treatment on hamstring flexibility was statistically significant between groups [F(2, 30) = 16.19, p < .001, ηp2 = .366], indicating that there was a statistical difference between at least one of the treatment groups. Post hoc multiple comparisons tests determined that there was a significant difference between the WU and WS groups, p < .001, 95% CI = [-3.38, -1.10], no significant differences between the WU and WL groups, p < .245, 95% CI = [-1.74, .30], and a significant difference between the WS and WL groups, p < .001, 95% CI = [.62, 2.43].Results indicated that the WS treatment (M = 28.984) resulted in significantly larger acute hamstring flexibility measurements than both the WL (M = 27.452) and WU (M = 26.774) treatments, but that there were no statistically significant differences between the WL and WU groups. Results also indicated that the order of treatment presentation did not impact the treatment results.
590 $a School code: 0390.
650 4 $a Kinesiology. $3 721210
650 4 $a Physical education. $3 1179721
650 4 $a Health sciences. $3 1179212
650 4 $a Health education. $3 585977
653 $a Flexibility
653 $a Lacrosse ball
653 $a Myofascial release
653 $a Self-myofascial release
653 $a Static
653 $a Stretching
690 $a 0680
690 $a 0566
690 $a 0523
690 $a 0575
710 2 $a Tennessee Technological University. $b Exceptional Learning. $3 1187381
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 84-02B.
790 $a 0390
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2022
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29260260