語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
People, parks, and power = the ethics of conservation-related resettlement /
紀錄類型:
書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
People, parks, and power/ by Maria Sapignoli, Robert K. Hitchcock.
其他題名:
the ethics of conservation-related resettlement /
作者:
Sapignoli, Maria.
其他作者:
Hitchcock, Robert K.
出版者:
Cham :Springer International Publishing : : 2023.,
面頁冊數:
xxxiii, 101 p. :illustrations, digital ; : 24 cm.;
Contained By:
Springer Nature eBook
標題:
Community and Population Ecology. -
電子資源:
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39268-9
ISBN:
9783031392689
People, parks, and power = the ethics of conservation-related resettlement /
Sapignoli, Maria.
People, parks, and power
the ethics of conservation-related resettlement /[electronic resource] :by Maria Sapignoli, Robert K. Hitchcock. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2023. - xxxiii, 101 p. :illustrations, digital ;24 cm. - Anthropology and ethics,2195-0830. - Anthropology and ethics..
Biodiversity Conservation, Protected Areas, and Indigenous Peoples -- Fortress Conservation: Removals of Indigenous People from Protected Areas in the United States -- Coercive Conservation: Removals of Indigenous Peoples from Protected Areas in Southern Africa -- Social Impacts of Conservation-Forced Resettlement -- Indigenous Peoples' Strategies for Coping with Protected Area Policies and Treatment -- Conservation, Ethics, and Indigenous Peoples.
This book presents a critical review of the ethics of conservation-related resettlement. We examine what has become known as the" parks versus people" debate, also known as the "new conservation debate," which has pitted indigenous and other local people against nation states and social scientists against ecologists and conservationists for the past several decades. Aiming to promote biodiversity conservation and habitat preservation, some biologists, park planners, and conservation organizations have recommended that indigenous and other people should be removed from protected areas. Local people, for their part, have argued that residents of the areas that were turned into protected areas, national parks, game reserves and monuments had managed them in productive ways for generations and that they should have the right to remain there and to use natural resources as long as they do so sustainably. This position is often supported by indigenous rights organizations and social scientists, especially anthropologists. There are also some conservation-oriented NGOs that have policies involving a more human rights-oriented approach aimed at poverty alleviation, sustainable development, and social justice. The book discusses biodiversity conservation, indigenous peoples (those who are ethnic minorities and who are often marginalized politically), and protected areas, those categories of land set aside by nation-states that have various kinds of rules about land use and residence. The focus initially is on case studies from protected areas in the United States including Yellowstone National Park, Yosemite National Park, and Glacier National Park and on national monuments and historical parks where resettlement took place. We then consider issues of coercive conservation in southern Africa, including Hwange National Park (Zimbabwe), the Central Kalahari Game Reserve (Botswana), Etosha National Park, and Bwabwata National Park (Namibia), and Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park (South Africa and Botswana) All of these cases involved involuntary resettlement at the hands of the governments. In the book we consider some of the social impacts of conservation-forced resettlement (CfR), many of which tend to be negative. After that, we assess some of the strategies employed by indigenous peoples in their efforts to recover rights of access to protected areas and the cultural and natural resources that they contain. Examples are drawn from cases in Asia, Africa, and South America. Conclusions are provided regarding the ethics of conservation-related resettlement and some of the best practices that could be followed, particularly with regard to indigenous peoples.
ISBN: 9783031392689
Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-031-39268-9doiSubjects--Topical Terms:
1365760
Community and Population Ecology.
LC Class. No.: SB486.S65
Dewey Class. No.: 333.783
People, parks, and power = the ethics of conservation-related resettlement /
LDR
:04231nam a2200337 a 4500
001
1119456
003
DE-He213
005
20231108122536.0
006
m d
007
cr nn 008maaau
008
240612s2023 sz s 0 eng d
020
$a
9783031392689
$q
(electronic bk.)
020
$a
9783031392665
$q
(paper)
024
7
$a
10.1007/978-3-031-39268-9
$2
doi
035
$a
978-3-031-39268-9
040
$a
GP
$c
GP
041
0
$a
eng
050
4
$a
SB486.S65
072
7
$a
JHM
$2
bicssc
072
7
$a
SOC002000
$2
bisacsh
072
7
$a
JHM
$2
thema
082
0 4
$a
333.783
$2
23
090
$a
SB486.S65
$b
S241 2023
100
1
$a
Sapignoli, Maria.
$3
1434203
245
1 0
$a
People, parks, and power
$h
[electronic resource] :
$b
the ethics of conservation-related resettlement /
$c
by Maria Sapignoli, Robert K. Hitchcock.
260
$a
Cham :
$c
2023.
$b
Springer International Publishing :
$b
Imprint: Springer,
300
$a
xxxiii, 101 p. :
$b
illustrations, digital ;
$c
24 cm.
490
1
$a
Anthropology and ethics,
$x
2195-0830
505
0
$a
Biodiversity Conservation, Protected Areas, and Indigenous Peoples -- Fortress Conservation: Removals of Indigenous People from Protected Areas in the United States -- Coercive Conservation: Removals of Indigenous Peoples from Protected Areas in Southern Africa -- Social Impacts of Conservation-Forced Resettlement -- Indigenous Peoples' Strategies for Coping with Protected Area Policies and Treatment -- Conservation, Ethics, and Indigenous Peoples.
520
$a
This book presents a critical review of the ethics of conservation-related resettlement. We examine what has become known as the" parks versus people" debate, also known as the "new conservation debate," which has pitted indigenous and other local people against nation states and social scientists against ecologists and conservationists for the past several decades. Aiming to promote biodiversity conservation and habitat preservation, some biologists, park planners, and conservation organizations have recommended that indigenous and other people should be removed from protected areas. Local people, for their part, have argued that residents of the areas that were turned into protected areas, national parks, game reserves and monuments had managed them in productive ways for generations and that they should have the right to remain there and to use natural resources as long as they do so sustainably. This position is often supported by indigenous rights organizations and social scientists, especially anthropologists. There are also some conservation-oriented NGOs that have policies involving a more human rights-oriented approach aimed at poverty alleviation, sustainable development, and social justice. The book discusses biodiversity conservation, indigenous peoples (those who are ethnic minorities and who are often marginalized politically), and protected areas, those categories of land set aside by nation-states that have various kinds of rules about land use and residence. The focus initially is on case studies from protected areas in the United States including Yellowstone National Park, Yosemite National Park, and Glacier National Park and on national monuments and historical parks where resettlement took place. We then consider issues of coercive conservation in southern Africa, including Hwange National Park (Zimbabwe), the Central Kalahari Game Reserve (Botswana), Etosha National Park, and Bwabwata National Park (Namibia), and Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park (South Africa and Botswana) All of these cases involved involuntary resettlement at the hands of the governments. In the book we consider some of the social impacts of conservation-forced resettlement (CfR), many of which tend to be negative. After that, we assess some of the strategies employed by indigenous peoples in their efforts to recover rights of access to protected areas and the cultural and natural resources that they contain. Examples are drawn from cases in Asia, Africa, and South America. Conclusions are provided regarding the ethics of conservation-related resettlement and some of the best practices that could be followed, particularly with regard to indigenous peoples.
650
2 4
$a
Community and Population Ecology.
$3
1365760
650
2 4
$a
Conservation Biology.
$3
1365727
650
1 4
$a
Anthropology.
$3
558887
650
0
$a
Protected areas
$v
Congresses.
$3
1376654
650
0
$a
National parks and reserves
$v
Case studies.
$3
1434209
650
0
$a
Protected areas
$x
Government policy.
$3
1434208
650
0
$a
Protected areas
$x
Social aspects.
$3
1434207
650
0
$a
National parks and reserves
$x
Government policy.
$3
1434206
650
0
$a
National parks and reserves
$x
Social aspects.
$3
1434205
650
0
$a
Environmental protection
$x
Moral and ethical aspects.
$3
864669
650
0
$a
Indigenous peoples
$x
Land tenure.
$3
807621
700
1
$a
Hitchcock, Robert K.
$3
1075601
710
2
$a
SpringerLink (Online service)
$3
593884
773
0
$t
Springer Nature eBook
830
0
$a
Anthropology and ethics.
$3
1434204
856
4 0
$u
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39268-9
950
$a
Behavioral Science and Psychology (SpringerNature-41168)
筆 0 讀者評論
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館別
處理中
...
變更密碼[密碼必須為2種組合(英文和數字)及長度為10碼以上]
登入