國立虎尾科技大學 |

A historical and legal comparison between Tianxia Wei Gong and Quod Omnes Tangit

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A historical and legal comparison between Tianxia Wei Gong and Quod Omnes Tangit/ by Yifan Shang.
作者:	Shang, Yifan.
出版者:	Cham :Springer International Publishing : : 2023.,
面頁冊數:	viii, 129 p. :illustrations, digital ; : 24 cm.;
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
標題:	Chinese Philosophy. -
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46467-6
ISBN:	9783031464676

A historical and legal comparison between Tianxia Wei Gong and Quod Omnes Tangit
Shang, Yifan.

A historical and legal comparison between Tianxia Wei Gong and Quod Omnes Tangit[electronic resource] /by Yifan Shang. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2023. - viii, 129 p. :illustrations, digital ;24 cm. - Ius gentium: comparative perspectives on law and justice,v. 1102214-9902 ;. - Ius gentium: comparative perspectives on law and justice ;v.10..

1. Introduction -- 2. Methodology -- 3. Similarities.-4. Differences -- 5. Conclusion.

This book explores the historical and legal importance of two principles, Quod Omnes Tangit, and Tianxia Wei Gong, which have played significant roles in European and Chinese political and legal history. While Quod Omnes Tangit has been thoroughly researched, Tianxia Wei Gong has not been systematically examined. This thesis fills this void and connects these two principles for the first time. Quod Omnes Tangit was initially introduced in Justinian's Codex Civil, while Tianxia Wei Gong originated from Liji, one of the books in a key series of works by Confucius. Liji is comparable to the Thora in the Old Testament and is considered as important as law in Chinese legal history. Both principles have undergone comparable developmental processes, with scholars contributing to their reinterpretation. This book thoroughly examines the interpretations of individual scholars, with particular attention given to Liang Qichao, who is the only one to have mentioned both Tianxia Wei Gong and Quod Omnes Tangit. The book also provides an explanation for the original discrepancies in their concepts, particularly their methodologies in distributing and legitimizing rights. This research will be of interest to legal philosophers and historians in both the Western and Eastern worlds, legal practitioners and policymakers, and researchers seeking to explain current events and explore fundamental differences between the East and West.

ISBN: 9783031464676

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-031-46467-6doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

1392773
Chinese Philosophy.

LC Class. No.: KJC383 / .S536 2023

Dewey Class. No.: 340.1

A historical and legal comparison between Tianxia Wei Gong and Quod Omnes Tangit
LDR:02665nam a2200361 a 4500 001 1119749
003 DE-He213
005 20231116114854.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 240612s2023 sz s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783031464676 $q (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783031464669 $q (paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-031-46467-6 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-031-46467-6
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a KJC383 $b .S536 2023
072 7 $a LB $2 bicssc
072 7 $a LAM $2 bicssc
072 7 $a LAW051000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a LB $2 thema
072 7 $a LAM $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 340.1 $2 23
090 $a KJC383 $b .S528 2023
100 1 $a Shang, Yifan. $3 1434603
245 1 2 $a A historical and legal comparison between Tianxia Wei Gong and Quod Omnes Tangit $h [electronic resource] / $c by Yifan Shang.
260 $a Cham : $c 2023. $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer,
300 $a viii, 129 p. : $b illustrations, digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a Ius gentium: comparative perspectives on law and justice, $x 2214-9902 ; $v v. 110
505 0 $a 1. Introduction -- 2. Methodology -- 3. Similarities.-4. Differences -- 5. Conclusion.
520 $a This book explores the historical and legal importance of two principles, Quod Omnes Tangit, and Tianxia Wei Gong, which have played significant roles in European and Chinese political and legal history. While Quod Omnes Tangit has been thoroughly researched, Tianxia Wei Gong has not been systematically examined. This thesis fills this void and connects these two principles for the first time. Quod Omnes Tangit was initially introduced in Justinian's Codex Civil, while Tianxia Wei Gong originated from Liji, one of the books in a key series of works by Confucius. Liji is comparable to the Thora in the Old Testament and is considered as important as law in Chinese legal history. Both principles have undergone comparable developmental processes, with scholars contributing to their reinterpretation. This book thoroughly examines the interpretations of individual scholars, with particular attention given to Liang Qichao, who is the only one to have mentioned both Tianxia Wei Gong and Quod Omnes Tangit. The book also provides an explanation for the original discrepancies in their concepts, particularly their methodologies in distributing and legitimizing rights. This research will be of interest to legal philosophers and historians in both the Western and Eastern worlds, legal practitioners and policymakers, and researchers seeking to explain current events and explore fundamental differences between the East and West.
650 2 4 $a Chinese Philosophy. $3 1392773
650 2 4 $a Asian History. $3 1016271
650 2 4 $a Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History. $3 883676
650 1 4 $a Private International Law, International and Foreign Law, Comparative Law. $3 1365811
650 0 $a Consent (Law) $z China $x History. $3 1434608
650 0 $a Law $z Europe $x History. $3 803451
650 0 $a Consent (Law) $z Europe $x History. $3 1434607
650 0 $a Law $z China $x Philosophy. $3 1434606
650 0 $a Social contract $x Philosophy. $3 1434605
650 0 $a Law $z Europe $x Philosophy. $3 1434604
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 593884
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
830 0 $a Ius gentium: comparative perspectives on law and justice ; $v v.10. $3 887880
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46467-6
950 $a History (SpringerNature-41172)