國立虎尾科技大學 |

Counterfeiting Shakespeare : = evidence, authorship, and John Ford's Funerall elegye /

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Counterfeiting Shakespeare :/ Brian Vickers.
其他題名:	evidence, authorship, and John Ford's Funerall elegye /
作者:	Vickers, Brian,
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (xxvii, 568 pages) :digital, PDF file(s). :
附註:	Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).
標題:	Poetry - Authorship. -
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511484049
ISBN:	9780511484049 (ebook)

Counterfeiting Shakespeare : = evidence, authorship, and John Ford's Funerall elegye /
Vickers, Brian,

Counterfeiting Shakespeare :evidence, authorship, and John Ford's Funerall elegye /Brian Vickers. - 1 online resource (xxvii, 568 pages) :digital, PDF file(s).

Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).

Prologue: Gary Taylor finds a poem --pt. I.

'Counterfeiting' Shakespeare addresses the fundamental issue of what Shakespeare actually wrote, and how this is determined. In recent years his authorship has been claimed for two poems, the lyric 'Shall I die?' and A Funerall Elegye. These attributions have been accepted into certain major editions of Shakespeare's works but Brian Vickers argues that both attributions rest on superficial verbal parallels; both use too small a sample, ignore negative evidence, and violate basic principles in authorship studies. Through a fresh examination of the evidence, Professor Vickers shows that neither poem has the stylistic and imaginative qualities we associate with Shakespeare. In other words, they are 'counterfeits', in the sense of anonymously authored works wrongly presented as Shakespeare's. He argues that the poet and dramatist John Ford wrote the Elegye: its poetical language (vocabulary, syntax, prosody) is indistinguishable from Ford's, and it contains several hundred close parallels with his work. By combining linguistic and statistical analysis this book makes an important contribution to authorship studies.

ISBN: 9780511484049 (ebook)Subjects--Personal Names:

1438872
Ford, John,
1586-approximately 1640--Authorship.Subjects--Topical Terms:

632345
Poetry
--Authorship.

LC Class. No.: PR2873.F86 / V53 2002

Dewey Class. No.: 822.3/3

Counterfeiting Shakespeare : = evidence, authorship, and John Ford's Funerall elegye /
LDR:02946nam a22003018i 4500 001 1122570
003 UkCbUP
005 20151005020620.0
006 m|||||o||d||||||||
007 cr||||||||||||
008 240926s2002||||enk o ||1 0|eng|d
020 $a 9780511484049 (ebook)
020 $z 9780521772433 (hardback)
020 $z 9780521120357 (paperback)
035 $a CR9780511484049
040 $a UkCbUP $b eng $e rda $c UkCbUP
050 0 0 $a PR2873.F86 $b V53 2002
082 0 0 $a 822.3/3 $2 21
100 1 $a Vickers, Brian, $e author. $3 1438870
245 1 0 $a Counterfeiting Shakespeare : $b evidence, authorship, and John Ford's Funerall elegye / $c Brian Vickers.
264 1 $a Cambridge : $b Cambridge University Press, $c 2002.
300 $a 1 online resource (xxvii, 568 pages) : $b digital, PDF file(s).
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).
505 0 0 $t Prologue: Gary Taylor finds a poem -- $g pt. I. $t Donald Foster's 'Shakespearean' Construct. $g 1. $t 'W. S.' and the Elegye for William Peter. $g 2. $t Parallels? Plagiarisms? $g 3. $t Vocabulary and diction. $g 4. $t Grammar: 'the Shakespearean "who"'. $g 5. $t Prosody, punctuation, pause patterns. $g 6. $t Rhetoric: 'the Shakespearean "hendiadys"'. $g 7. $t Statistics and inference. $g 8. $t A poem 'indistinguishable from Shakespeare'? -- $g pt. II. $t John Ford's 'Funerall Elegye'. $g 9. $t Ford's writing career: poet, moralist, playwright. $g 10. $t Ford and the Elegye's 'Shakespearean diction'. $g 11. $t The Funerall Elegye in its Fordian context. $t Epilogue: The politics of attribution -- $g App. I. $t The text of A Funerall Elegye -- $g App. II. $t Verbal parallels between A Funerall Elegye and Ford's poems.
520 $a 'Counterfeiting' Shakespeare addresses the fundamental issue of what Shakespeare actually wrote, and how this is determined. In recent years his authorship has been claimed for two poems, the lyric 'Shall I die?' and A Funerall Elegye. These attributions have been accepted into certain major editions of Shakespeare's works but Brian Vickers argues that both attributions rest on superficial verbal parallels; both use too small a sample, ignore negative evidence, and violate basic principles in authorship studies. Through a fresh examination of the evidence, Professor Vickers shows that neither poem has the stylistic and imaginative qualities we associate with Shakespeare. In other words, they are 'counterfeits', in the sense of anonymously authored works wrongly presented as Shakespeare's. He argues that the poet and dramatist John Ford wrote the Elegye: its poetical language (vocabulary, syntax, prosody) is indistinguishable from Ford's, and it contains several hundred close parallels with his work. By combining linguistic and statistical analysis this book makes an important contribution to authorship studies.
600 1 0 $a Ford, John, $d 1586-approximately 1640 $x Authorship. $3 1438872
600 1 0 $a Shakespeare, William, $d 1564-1616 $x Literary style. $3 801322
600 0 0 $a W. S. $t Funerall elegye in memory of the late virtuous master William Peeter of Whipton neere Exetour. $3 1438871
650 0 $a Poetry $x Authorship. $3 632345
776 0 8 $i Print version: $z 9780521772433
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511484049