國立虎尾科技大學 |

The role of domestic courts in treaty enforcement : = a comparative study /

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The role of domestic courts in treaty enforcement :/ edited by David Sloss.
其他題名:	a comparative study /
其他作者:	Sloss, David,
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (xxix, 626 pages) :digital, PDF file(s). :
附註:	Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).
標題:	Jurisdiction (International law) -
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511635458
ISBN:	9780511635458 (ebook)

The role of domestic courts in treaty enforcement : = a comparative study /
The role of domestic courts in treaty enforcement :a comparative study /edited by David Sloss. - 1 online resource (xxix, 626 pages) :digital, PDF file(s).

Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).

Treaty enforcement in domestic courts : a comparative analysis /David Sloss --

This book examines the application of treaties by domestic courts in twelve countries. The central question is whether domestic courts actually provide remedies to private parties who are harmed by a violation of their treaty-based rights. The analysis shows that domestic courts in eight of the twelve countries - Australia, Canada, Germany, India, the Netherlands, Poland, South Africa, and the United Kingdom - generally do enforce treaty-based rights on behalf of private parties. On the other hand, the evidence is mixed for the other four countries: China, Israel, Russia, and the United States. In China, Israel, and Russia, the trends are moving in the direction of greater judicial enforcement of treaties on behalf of private parties. The United States is the only country surveyed where the trend is moving in the opposite direction. US courts' reluctance to enforce treaty-based rights undermines efforts to develop a more cooperative global order.

ISBN: 9780511635458 (ebook)Subjects--Topical Terms:

570787
Jurisdiction (International law)

LC Class. No.: KZ1303 / .R65 2009

Dewey Class. No.: 341.3/7

The role of domestic courts in treaty enforcement : = a comparative study /
LDR:02786nam a2200301 i 4500 001 1123441
003 UkCbUP
005 20151005020622.0
006 m|||||o||d||||||||
007 cr||||||||||||
008 240926s2009||||enk o ||1 0|eng|d
020 $a 9780511635458 (ebook)
020 $z 9780521877305 (hardback)
020 $z 9781107633742 (paperback)
035 $a CR9780511635458
040 $a UkCbUP $b eng $e rda $c UkCbUP
050 0 0 $a KZ1303 $b .R65 2009
082 0 0 $a 341.3/7 $2 22
245 0 4 $a The role of domestic courts in treaty enforcement : $b a comparative study / $c edited by David Sloss.
264 1 $a Cambridge : $b Cambridge University Press, $c 2009.
300 $a 1 online resource (xxix, 626 pages) : $b digital, PDF file(s).
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).
505 0 0 $t Treaty enforcement in domestic courts : a comparative analysis / $r David Sloss -- $t Does international law obligate states to open their national courts to persons for the invocation of treaty norms that protect or benefit persons? / $r Sean D. Murphy -- $t Australia / $r Donald R. Rothwell -- $t Canada / $r Gib van Ert -- $t Germany / $r Andreas L. Paulus -- $t India / $r Nihal Jayawickrama -- $t Israel / $r David Kretzmer -- $t The Netherlands / $r André Nollkaemper -- $t Poland / $r Lech Garlicki, Małgorzata Masternak-Kubiak, and Krzysztof Wójtowicz -- $t Russian Federation / $r William E. Butler -- $t South Africa / $r John Dugard -- $t United Kingdom / $r Anthony Aust -- $t United States / $r David Sloss -- $t The role of domestic courts in treaty enforcement : summary and conclusions / $r Michael P. Van Alstine.
520 $a This book examines the application of treaties by domestic courts in twelve countries. The central question is whether domestic courts actually provide remedies to private parties who are harmed by a violation of their treaty-based rights. The analysis shows that domestic courts in eight of the twelve countries - Australia, Canada, Germany, India, the Netherlands, Poland, South Africa, and the United Kingdom - generally do enforce treaty-based rights on behalf of private parties. On the other hand, the evidence is mixed for the other four countries: China, Israel, Russia, and the United States. In China, Israel, and Russia, the trends are moving in the direction of greater judicial enforcement of treaties on behalf of private parties. The United States is the only country surveyed where the trend is moving in the opposite direction. US courts' reluctance to enforce treaty-based rights undermines efforts to develop a more cooperative global order.
650 0 $a Jurisdiction (International law) $3 570787
650 0 $a Jurisdiction. $3 559835
650 0 $a International and municipal law. $3 559834
650 0 $a Treaties. $3 570600
700 1 $a Sloss, David, $e editor. $3 1440348
776 0 8 $i Print version: $z 9780521877305
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511635458