國立虎尾科技大學 |

How the weak win wars : = a theory of asymmetric conflict /

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	How the weak win wars :/ Ivan Arreguín-Toft.
其他題名:	a theory of asymmetric conflict /
作者:	Arreguín-Toft, Ivan M.,
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (xv, 250 pages) :digital, PDF file(s). :
附註:	Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).
標題:	Military history, Modern - Case studies. -
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511521645
ISBN:	9780511521645 (ebook)

How the weak win wars : = a theory of asymmetric conflict /
Arreguín-Toft, Ivan M.,

How the weak win wars :a theory of asymmetric conflict /Ivan Arreguín-Toft. - 1 online resource (xv, 250 pages) :digital, PDF file(s). - Cambridge studies in international relations ;99. - Cambridge studies in international relations ;71..

Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).

Introduction. -- Explaining asymmetric conflict outcomes. -- Russia in the Caucasus: the Murid War, 1830-1859. -- Britain in Orange Free State and Transvaal: the South African War, 1899-1902. -- Italy in Ethiopia: the Italo-Ethiopian War, 1935-1940. -- The United States in Vietnam: the Vietnam War, 1965-1973. -- The USSR in Afghanistan: the Afghan Civil War, 1979-1989. -- Conclusion.

How do the weak win wars? The likelihood of victory and defeat in asymmetric conflicts depends on the interaction of the strategies weak and strong actors use. Using statistical and in-depth historical analyses of conflicts spanning two hundred years, in this 2005 book Ivan Arregúin-Toft shows that, independent of regime type and weapons technology, the interaction of similar strategic approaches favors strong actors, while opposite strategic approaches favors the weak. This approach to understanding asymmetric conflicts allows us to makes sense of how the United States was able to win its war in Afghanistan (2002) in a few months, while the Soviet Union lost after a decade of brutal war (1979-89). Arreguín-Toft's strategic interaction theory has implications not only for international relations theory, but for policy makers grappling with interstate and civil wars, as well as terrorism.

ISBN: 9780511521645 (ebook)Subjects--Topical Terms:

798828
Military history, Modern
--Case studies.

LC Class. No.: U163 / .A776 2005

Dewey Class. No.: 355.4/2

How the weak win wars : = a theory of asymmetric conflict /
LDR:02381nam a2200313 i 4500 001 1124720
003 UkCbUP
005 20151005020621.0
006 m|||||o||d||||||||
007 cr||||||||||||
008 240926s2005||||enk o ||1 0|eng|d
020 $a 9780511521645 (ebook)
020 $z 9780521839761 (hardback)
020 $z 9780521548694 (paperback)
035 $a CR9780511521645
040 $a UkCbUP $b eng $e rda $c UkCbUP
050 0 0 $a U163 $b .A776 2005
082 0 0 $a 355.4/2 $2 22
100 1 $a Arreguín-Toft, Ivan M., $e author. $3 1442441
245 1 0 $a How the weak win wars : $b a theory of asymmetric conflict / $c Ivan Arreguín-Toft.
264 1 $a Cambridge : $b Cambridge University Press, $c 2005.
300 $a 1 online resource (xv, 250 pages) : $b digital, PDF file(s).
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
490 1 $a Cambridge studies in international relations ; $v 99
500 $a Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).
505 0 $a Introduction. -- Explaining asymmetric conflict outcomes. -- Russia in the Caucasus: the Murid War, 1830-1859. -- Britain in Orange Free State and Transvaal: the South African War, 1899-1902. -- Italy in Ethiopia: the Italo-Ethiopian War, 1935-1940. -- The United States in Vietnam: the Vietnam War, 1965-1973. -- The USSR in Afghanistan: the Afghan Civil War, 1979-1989. -- Conclusion.
520 $a How do the weak win wars? The likelihood of victory and defeat in asymmetric conflicts depends on the interaction of the strategies weak and strong actors use. Using statistical and in-depth historical analyses of conflicts spanning two hundred years, in this 2005 book Ivan Arregúin-Toft shows that, independent of regime type and weapons technology, the interaction of similar strategic approaches favors strong actors, while opposite strategic approaches favors the weak. This approach to understanding asymmetric conflicts allows us to makes sense of how the United States was able to win its war in Afghanistan (2002) in a few months, while the Soviet Union lost after a decade of brutal war (1979-89). Arreguín-Toft's strategic interaction theory has implications not only for international relations theory, but for policy makers grappling with interstate and civil wars, as well as terrorism.
650 0 $a Military history, Modern $v Case studies. $3 798828
650 0 $a Asymmetric warfare $v Case studies. $3 798827
776 0 8 $i Print version: $z 9780521839761
830 0 $a Cambridge studies in international relations ; $v 71. $3 1374815
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511521645