國立虎尾科技大學 |

Common sense : = a contemporary defense /

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Common sense :/ Noah Lemos.
Reminder of title:	a contemporary defense /
Author:	Lemos, Noah Marcelino,
Description:	1 online resource (xvi, 192 pages) :digital, PDF file(s). :
Notes:	Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).
Subject:	Common sense. -
Online resource:	https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498800
ISBN:	9780511498800 (ebook)

Common sense : = a contemporary defense /
Lemos, Noah Marcelino,1956-

Common sense :a contemporary defense /Noah Lemos. - 1 online resource (xvi, 192 pages) :digital, PDF file(s). - Cambridge studies in philosophy. - Cambridge studies in philosophy..

Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).

The common sense tradition --

In this 2004 book, Noah Lemos presents a strong defense of the common sense tradition, the view that we may take as data for philosophical inquiry many of the things we ordinarily think we know. He discusses the main features of that tradition as expounded by Thomas Reid, G. E. Moore and Roderick Chisholm. For a long time common sense philosophers have been subject to two main objections: that they fail to give any non-circular argument for the reliability of memory and perception; and that they pick out instances of knowledge without knowing a criterion for knowledge. Lemos defends the appeal to what we ordinarily think we know in both epistemology and ethics and thus rejects the charge that common sense is dogmatic, unphilosophical or question-begging. Written in a clear and engaging style, this book will appeal to students and philosophers in epistemology and ethics.

ISBN: 9780511498800 (ebook)Subjects--Topical Terms:

576165
Common sense.

LC Class. No.: B105.C457 / L46 2004

Dewey Class. No.: 149

Common sense : = a contemporary defense /
LDR:02259nam a2200313 i 4500 001 1126463
003 UkCbUP
005 20151005020624.0
006 m|||||o||d||||||||
007 cr||||||||||||
008 240926s2004||||enk o ||1 0|eng|d
020 $a 9780511498800 (ebook)
020 $z 9780521837842 (hardback)
020 $z 9780521143455 (paperback)
035 $a CR9780511498800
040 $a UkCbUP $b eng $e rda $c UkCbUP
050 0 0 $a B105.C457 $b L46 2004
082 0 0 $a 149 $2 22
100 1 $a Lemos, Noah Marcelino, $d 1956- $e author. $3 1445292
245 1 0 $a Common sense : $b a contemporary defense / $c Noah Lemos.
264 1 $a Cambridge : $b Cambridge University Press, $c 2004.
300 $a 1 online resource (xvi, 192 pages) : $b digital, PDF file(s).
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
490 1 $a Cambridge studies in philosophy
500 $a Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).
505 0 0 $t The common sense tradition -- $t Common sense and reliability -- $t Common sense and reliability II -- $t Reid, reliability, and Reid's wrong turn -- $t Moore, skepticism, and the external world -- $t Chisholm, particularism, and methodism -- $t Common sense and a priori epistemology -- $t Particularism, ethical skepticism, and moral philosophy.
520 $a In this 2004 book, Noah Lemos presents a strong defense of the common sense tradition, the view that we may take as data for philosophical inquiry many of the things we ordinarily think we know. He discusses the main features of that tradition as expounded by Thomas Reid, G. E. Moore and Roderick Chisholm. For a long time common sense philosophers have been subject to two main objections: that they fail to give any non-circular argument for the reliability of memory and perception; and that they pick out instances of knowledge without knowing a criterion for knowledge. Lemos defends the appeal to what we ordinarily think we know in both epistemology and ethics and thus rejects the charge that common sense is dogmatic, unphilosophical or question-begging. Written in a clear and engaging style, this book will appeal to students and philosophers in epistemology and ethics.
650 0 $a Common sense. $3 576165
776 0 8 $i Print version: $z 9780521837842
830 0 $a Cambridge studies in philosophy. $3 1375696
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498800