國立虎尾科技大學 |

Relevance and linguistic meaning : = the semantics and pragmatics of discourse markers /

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Relevance and linguistic meaning :/ Diane Blakemore.
其他題名:	the semantics and pragmatics of discourse markers /
其他題名:	Relevance & Linguistic Meaning
作者:	Blakemore, Diane,
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (viii, 200 pages) :digital, PDF file(s). :
附註:	Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).
標題:	Pragmatics. -
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486456
ISBN:	9780511486456 (ebook)

Relevance and linguistic meaning : = the semantics and pragmatics of discourse markers /
Blakemore, Diane,

Relevance and linguistic meaning :the semantics and pragmatics of discourse markers /Relevance & Linguistic MeaningDiane Blakemore. - 1 online resource (viii, 200 pages) :digital, PDF file(s). - Cambridge studies in linguistics ;99. - Cambridge studies in linguistics ;98..

Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).

1. Meaning and truth -- 2. Non-truth conditional meaning -- 3. Relevance and meaning -- 4. Procedural meaning -- 5. Relevance and discourse.

The importance of discourse markers (words like 'so', 'however', and 'well') lies in the theoretical questions they raise about the nature of discourse and the relationship between linguistic meaning and context. They are regarded as being central to semantics because they raise problems for standard theories of meaning, and to pragmatics because they seem to play a role in the way discourse is understood. In this new and important study, Diane Blakemore argues that attempts to analyse these expressions within standard semantic frameworks raise even more problems, while their analysis as expressions that link segments of discourse has led to an unproductive and confusing exercise in classification. She concludes that the exercise in classification that has dominated discourse marker research should be replaced by the investigation of the way in which linguistic expressions contribute to the inferential processes involved in utterance understanding.

ISBN: 9780511486456 (ebook)Subjects--Topical Terms:

556167
Pragmatics.

LC Class. No.: P302.35 / .B58 2002

Dewey Class. No.: 401/.41

Relevance and linguistic meaning : = the semantics and pragmatics of discourse markers /
LDR:02256nam a2200325 i 4500 001 1127593
003 UkCbUP
005 20160330134009.0
006 m|||||o||d||||||||
007 cr||||||||||||
008 240926s2002||||enk o ||1 0|eng|d
020 $a 9780511486456 (ebook)
020 $z 9780521640077 (hardback)
020 $z 9780521607711 (paperback)
035 $a CR9780511486456
040 $a UkCbUP $b eng $e rda $c UkCbUP
050 0 0 $a P302.35 $b .B58 2002
082 0 0 $a 401/.41 $2 21
100 1 $a Blakemore, Diane, $e author. $3 1447061
245 1 0 $a Relevance and linguistic meaning : $b the semantics and pragmatics of discourse markers / $c Diane Blakemore.
246 3 $a Relevance & Linguistic Meaning
264 1 $a Cambridge : $b Cambridge University Press, $c 2002.
300 $a 1 online resource (viii, 200 pages) : $b digital, PDF file(s).
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
490 1 $a Cambridge studies in linguistics ; $v 99
500 $a Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).
505 0 $a 1. Meaning and truth -- 2. Non-truth conditional meaning -- 3. Relevance and meaning -- 4. Procedural meaning -- 5. Relevance and discourse.
520 $a The importance of discourse markers (words like 'so', 'however', and 'well') lies in the theoretical questions they raise about the nature of discourse and the relationship between linguistic meaning and context. They are regarded as being central to semantics because they raise problems for standard theories of meaning, and to pragmatics because they seem to play a role in the way discourse is understood. In this new and important study, Diane Blakemore argues that attempts to analyse these expressions within standard semantic frameworks raise even more problems, while their analysis as expressions that link segments of discourse has led to an unproductive and confusing exercise in classification. She concludes that the exercise in classification that has dominated discourse marker research should be replaced by the investigation of the way in which linguistic expressions contribute to the inferential processes involved in utterance understanding.
650 0 $a Pragmatics. $3 556167
650 0 $a Relevance. $3 803162
650 0 $a Semantics. $3 555362
650 0 $a Discourse markers. $3 558205
776 0 8 $i Print version: $z 9780521640077
830 0 $a Cambridge studies in linguistics ; $v 98. $3 773831
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486456